On 30 June 2011 06:18, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I prefer the old version where the Champion was partial pragmatic;
awarded by the Herald (hopefully when e's pretty sure the dust has
settled) but the award fails if
On 30 June 2011 03:52, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I left self-ratification in as Walker had it in eir draft I was trying to fix,
don't really mind! I'd vote for either. I'll leave it up to Walker.
I don't particularly mind either, I just added it in because I
remember wins
From: Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:38 PM
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration
Ed Murphy wrote:
No relation.
-
Agreed. No relation (as far as we know).
Joshua Murphy wrote:
I hereby
People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't really rules.
If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we make them actual rules?
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:50 -0700, Joshua Murphy wrote:
People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't
really rules. If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we
make them actual rules?
They aren't binding; rather, they're a reflection of what most players
think the
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:50, Joshua Murphy math...@ymail.com wrote:
People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't really rules.
If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we make them actual rules?
CFJ procedure is codified in the rules. A CFJ itself can be called
On 30 June 2011 23:50, Joshua Murphy math...@ymail.com wrote:
People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't really rules.
If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we make them actual rules?
It's a similar situation to common law.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 30 June 2011 23:50, Joshua Murphy math...@ymail.com wrote:
People refer to some CFJs like they were rules, but they aren't
really rules. If there isn't any particular reason for this, can we make
them
On 1 July 2011 00:09, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that it's not, because in common law jurisdictions the rulings
actually have legitimate power, while in Agora you're just allowed to
possibly consider them in interpreting the rules.
Yeah, but is that power actually
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 1 July 2011 00:09, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that it's not, because in common law jurisdictions the rulings
actually have legitimate power, while in Agora you're just allowed to
possibly consider them in interpreting the
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 17:00 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
There's nothing to stop someone from calling the same CFJ over and over
again, hoping for the opposite answer. Sometimes people have done that
in the past... once or twice. We deal with that by saying once an
answer is given, you should
11 matches
Mail list logo
