On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:21 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
*7111 1.0 Tanner L. Points for the Big Guy
*7115 1.0 Tanner L. Relax /
omd wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
*7111 1.0 Tanner L. Points for the Big Guy
*7115 1.0 Tanner L. Relax / Stroke Hell
CoE: not that either of these would have
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Purported distributions don't self-ratify. Purported resolutions do
(R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that
the proposal exists.
The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Purported distributions don't self-ratify. Purported resolutions do
(R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that
the proposal exists.
The rule which
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is
R107, which includes the lack is correctly identified within one
week clause.
Hm, not exactly. For a Decision to be initiated by R107, both:
(1)
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Purported distributions don't self-ratify. Purported resolutions do
(R2034), including (for decisions on proposals) the implicit claim that
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, omd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The rule which would invalidate it for missing essential parameters is
R107, which includes the lack is correctly identified within one
week clause.
Hm, not exactly. For a
7 matches
Mail list logo
