DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3282 assigned to G.

2012-10-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Ed Murphy wrote: since Golems are *not* sending messages and no rule is pretending they are, it's equally valid to say I cause my Golem to do X without objection as I cause my Golem to do X by announcement (since by announcement is defined with reference to sending

Re: DIS: well? and just to get going

2012-10-14 Thread Elliott Hird
On 11 October 2012 21:31, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: d. Per-problem, test cases may have a practical cycle limit or right-tape limit (to prevent someone claiming hey, it would work if you let it run 1e15 cycles! when it's pretty clear it's not going to do what's intended).

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3282 assigned to G.

2012-10-14 Thread omd
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: I'm still sorting it out, but I must say I wholly disagree with this bit. The Fora rule allows any player to make an announcement by sending a message via a public forum. It is a simple inference from slave golem