I've really been slacking on that report, this is totally deserved. It
really shouldn't be hard to get *a* report, event if I don't do the
whole Python script thing.
On 6/1/2018 2:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On behalf of ATMunn (via contract) I point the finger at the following
players for
Naw, I could have figured it out really, but it *is* an added burden if the
reporting isn't up-to-date.
I'm concerned about overall playability because auto-destruction is really
off-putting and discouraging of play in this case. What would you think
about making facility destruction
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> CoE: All non-preserved facilities were destroyed on the first of June due to
> lack of upkeep paid.
Meaning all assets in those facilities are lost, correct?
Ok, I personally consider that a material loss that came from the lack of
Officer Reports,
We'll *I'm* not going to say anything in public :)
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> *slams face against wall repeatedly for two hours*
>
> I could've sworn I deleted that part.
>
> This is an issue that's gotten in the way of too many land auctions;
> therefore, I propose we ignore
I was thinking the bug in this particular case is actually a Good Thing to
really open up land (maybe a good counter to the zombie issue as it could
open lots of territory).
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Now that this bug has been discovered, land transfigurations are dirt cheap.
*slams face against wall repeatedly for two hours*
I could've sworn I deleted that part.
This is an issue that's gotten in the way of too many land auctions;
therefore, I propose we ignore it this time.
On 06/01/2018 11:04 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, ATMunn wrote:
AUCTION
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> > > > > AUCTION 1: the white land unit at (+3, -1)
> > > > >
> > > > > AUCTION 2: the white land unit at (+5, 0)
> > > > >
> > > > > AUCTION 3: the white land unit at (+6, 0)
I've just noticed issues with these three auction announcements -
I think they
If you hate the game, then why are you playing it? :P
On 6/1/2018 6:36 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
I hate this game and create and pend the following proposal with paper.
Title: Let's not make game assets one letter different from each other
AI: 3
Text: Amend rule 2003 by replacing "substitute 1
What if you want to use a d10? That's not a platonic solid.
On 5/31/2018 10:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
Because it would be easy to change the result probabilities in this way, I
don't think this satisfies "SHOULD use a method for which the final
goddamnit this is why I have to start reading emails top-down.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Well, you were named as a co-author! :P
>
> That's good. I thought it was probably a mistake, but I wanted to make
> sure.
>
> I create the following proposal:
>
>
That's definitely a mistake and breaks several things. Well, at least I can
say that it wasn't me this time lol.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 02:24 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Since we're talking about proposals that aren't in the SLR yet, I noticed
> this in the Consolidated Patch (proposal 8041):
>
>
Since we're talking about proposals that aren't in the SLR yet, I noticed this
in the Consolidated Patch (proposal 8041):
> Amend Rule 2003, Actions in Arcadia, by changing the text "substitute 3
> apples for 1 corn" to read "substitute 1 coin for three or fewer apples"
Was the change from
Of course, I mean "if e will react to this". Sorry.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 1, 2018 6:59 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
>
> I wonder if he will react to this:
>
> I intend to cause the office of Rulekeepor to become vacant, without 2
> objections.
>
> -twg
>
>
If I wasn't already the Cartographor and under a workload I still can't
fully handle, I would have deputized for this position. And as much as I
want to say I'll have more time over the summer to do Agoran work, I
really won't. It's mildly infuriating to watch these important positions
Sorry, I forgot to greet you properly. Welcome to the game! I was half
hoping we might have some watchers who could register. Don't worry,
everyone starts off confused. The missing reports really don't help though,
and we need to fix them.
-Aris
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:18 PM Ned Strange
I favor this case. I should have time starting next week
-Aris
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:53 PM Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 23:27 -0700, rol...@pbegames.com wrote:
> > Signed section - include this line
> >
> > Results:
> > Results sent via email.
> > Summary: Possibly
Sorry, forgot to reply to this! Yes, that works as a nickname.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On May 25, 2018 1:18 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
>
>
> Welcome! I assume your nickname is twg?
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:
>
> > I intend to
On June 1, 2018 1:06 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> - The message would be forwarded by you, but then there would need to be
>
> a way to verify not just that server message but also that you
>
> hadn't made any other similar requests.
Thinking idly: A way
18 matches
Mail list logo
