Pending’s gone, so can you retract?
Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Right you are, Ørjan. I retract the two proposals I have most recently
> submitted and instead submit the following two:
>
> -
> Title: Only proposals should be distributed
> AI: 1
> Author
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Repeal Rule 2505 "Distributing Assets".
That should be 2515.
Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by:
replacing the following:
2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N
Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the in
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, ATMunn wrote:
Imminent Sector is an singleton switch, tracked by the Spacekeepor,
defaulting to 1. Every time a player receives a Welcome Package, the
Imminent Sector is increased by one. If the Imminent Sector ever is
greater than the cur
Comments on comments below.
On 10/31/2018 5:50 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Comments inline
Gaelan
On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:19 PM, ATMunn wrote:
So I've been working on the space proposal some more. It's taken me a lot longer than I
thought it would, but I've made a ton of progress. I still have
Comments inline
Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:19 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> So I've been working on the space proposal some more. It's taken me a lot
> longer than I thought it would, but I've made a ton of progress. I still have
> that feeling that there's something super important I've missed,
also your messages are all getting marked as spam by me dude.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:47 AM Rebecca wrote:
> holy shit dude it's taredas. i don't think you remember me but i was
> Burning_Earth on MTGS lol.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:04 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Welcome, Tarhalindur!
holy shit dude it's taredas. i don't think you remember me but i was
Burning_Earth on MTGS lol.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:04 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Welcome, Tarhalindur! (you may want to sign your nickname in your messages
> since it's not in your email address, until we get used to who you
So I've been working on the space proposal some more. It's taken me a
lot longer than I thought it would, but I've made a ton of progress. I
still have that feeling that there's something super important I've
missed, but I can't think of it. Of course, this "update" doesn't really
include any m
It's been a year? Oh, wow.
On 10/31/2018 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
[Marking the 1-year anniversary of zombies, that debuted last Halloween!]
I initiate a zombie auction, with the following lots (each zombie a
separate lot) ordered as follows (highest-bid first):
1. pokes
2. 天火狐
Agora is
Welcome, Tarhalindur! (you may want to sign your nickname in your messages
since it's not in your email address, until we get used to who you are).
The current "status" of subject-line stuff is it can work IF something in the
body of the message (like: "See the subject.") draws attention to it
There have been some recent-ish debates on whether or not subject line
actions actually work - I don't remember the exact state of that. So
there's a chance this was ineffective.
Either way, welcome!
On 10/31/2018 3:54 PM, Aharon Zingman wrote:
See the subject.
Idea that I might be up for doing: an unofficial "officer" that makes a
"report" every month with a summary of the current rules state, and
major changes since the last one. Basically a lower-effort, unofficial
version of Rulekeepor.
On 10/31/2018 1:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
About once ever
G did try to start a festival once (in response to my April Fools proposal
overwriting the ruleset with BlogNomic’s). It didn’t actually happen, however.
Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:37 AM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 11:54 -0500, Aharon Zingman wrote:
>> Intern
On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 11:54 -0500, Aharon Zingman wrote:
> Internal Affairs is a hypothetical proposal. Essentially, this puts a
> person in charge of keeping shitters, griefers, and people who wish
> to disrupt Agora out. I might elaborate if this would be a good idea.
Our current anti-disruption
Hi, I'm the Rulekeepor. I organized the Rulesets. I will admit that the
textual Rulesets are not the very convenient. That's why I didn't join
Agora earlier, in fact. Eventually, I'm going to attempt to make an
interactive Ruleset, but I haven't even started working on the code to
generate that.
F
About once every 5 years someone has written a FAQ, which is useful for about a
year
until the rules change enough or we forget about it - we've been terrible about
actually maintaining such things. It's been that long or more since the last
one
I think (maybe I'm wrong there).
On Wed, 31 Oc
Internal Affairs is a hypothetical proposal. Essentially, this puts a
person in charge of keeping shitters, griefers, and people who wish to
disrupt Agora out. I might elaborate if this would be a good idea.
--
This is a student email account managed by the
Iowa City Community School
District.
No, not that I know of. As I recall, there was some discussion about making one
a while ago (for precisely this reason - it's intimidating to new players). But
it never came to anything.
In my opinion, these are the most important things to know (other people feel
free to disagree / chip in):
I consent to be bound by the contract below with any 1 or more other players
who at any time similarly express their consent to be bound by the contract.
[Thanks to D. Margaux for the wording]
{
Any party to this contract may act on Gaelan’s behalf to transfer one coin to
emselves. Once this i
(Needs to go to the public forum)
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I do.
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On Oct 31, 2018, at 7:41 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
>>
>> Gaelan:
>>
>> To fix a mistake I made in drafting, I propose to modify the contract by
>> adding to the end of it the follow
Is there a summary of the rules? I'm trying to read the whole SLR but it's
about as concise as the US tax code.
--
This is a student email account managed by the
Iowa City Community School
District.
I do.
Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 7:41 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> Gaelan:
>
> To fix a mistake I made in drafting, I propose to modify the contract by
> adding to the end of it the following sentence: “Any player CAN become a
> party to this contract by announcement.”
>
> Do you agree?
>
Having recieved no objection, I do so.
Also, I intend to clean Rule 2350 "Proposals" by replacing all
instances of "nether" with "neither"
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:35 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 991 by replacing all instances
> of the word "Judgment" wi
This is Tarhalindur! I'm considering signing up for Agora Nomic. This is
just my, how do we call it...? *Debut.*
--
This is a student email account managed by the
Iowa City Community School
District.
Sorry, wasn't sure if you can resign an imposed office
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:57 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Although I guess whether or not you are the Speaker is still subject to CFJ?
> I'm not sure, I don't really have a firm grasp of what's going on. Either
> way, this is unnecessaril
Although I guess whether or not you are the Speaker is still subject to CFJ?
I'm not sure, I don't really have a firm grasp of what's going on. Either way,
this is unnecessarily confusing at best and might actively cause havoc at worst.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, Octob
26 matches
Mail list logo
