Falisifian is the author of 8202 ("Police Power"), although e has listed
me as a co-author.
Jason Cobb
On 7/13/19 11:15 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
With all of the proposals that are in the pool at the moment, errors
seem likely. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.
-Aris
---
I hereby
With all of the proposals that are in the pool at the moment, errors
seem likely. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the
Just added that (also realized that I need to allow players voting on
only some proposals, that's fixed, too).
Jason Cobb
On 7/13/19 9:51 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
You're welcome!
Incidentally, could you add a feature that states the number of voters
on each decision? It would be helpful info,
I'm sorry, but how exactly could mayhem be created by (slightly) messing
up Karma?
Jason Cobb
On 7/13/19 9:31 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I strongly suspect that R. Lee is intending to veto part of this
proposal, thereby creating mayhem. I apologize to em if this is not in
fact the case.
-Aris
No I was going to lull you into a false sense of security and do it
later smh
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 12:31 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I strongly suspect that R. Lee is intending to veto part of this
> proposal, thereby creating mayhem. I apologize to em i
You're welcome!
Incidentally, could you add a feature that states the number of voters
on each decision? It would be helpful info, and make it a bit easier
to calculate quorum.
-Aris
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:52 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> I see. Thank you! :)
>
> Jason Cobb
>
> On 7/12/19 9:45 P
I strongly suspect that R. Lee is intending to veto part of this
proposal, thereby creating mayhem. I apologize to em if this is not in
fact the case.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:49 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> I create and pend the following proposal
>
> Title: SMH @ Herald
> AI: 1
> Text: 1. Halve
Perhaps we could require that the player who flips someone else's master
switch without objection first make a payment to Agora equal to a welcome
package. That would make this scam unprofitable by essentially pre-funding
the new zombie's welcome package.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 9:28 PM Kerim Aydi
On 7/13/2019 3:02 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
"A player can flip to emself another player's master switch by announcement without
objection from that other player, provided the intent to flip that switch is announced at
least 7 days before the switch is flipped."
There's a darn-obvious scam here
> On Jul 13, 2019, at 6:10 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> Is there a reason to not use "with 7 days Notice" instead of "provided the
> intent to flip that switch is announced at least 7 days before the switch is
> flipped"? That would also include by reference the conspicuousness/clarity
> requi
Which precedent? "just making a post" is explicitly disallowed in R2466:
> A person CANNOT act
> on behalf of another person to do anything except perform a game
> action; in particular, a person CANNOT act on behalf of another
>
Is there a reason to not use "with 7 days Notice" instead of "provided
the intent to flip that switch is announced at least 7 days before the
switch is flipped"? That would also include by reference the
conspicuousness/clarity requirements.
Also, would this allow stealing other people's zombi
You cannot make a post on behalf of a zombie to a public forum; it is
explicitly forbidden my the acting on behalf rule.
-Aris
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:56 PM Rebecca wrote:
> by precedent you can do anything like that on behalf of a zombie including
> just making a post to a public forum
>
> O
by precedent you can do anything like that on behalf of a zombie including
just making a post to a public forum
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 7:28 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I just noticed that, according to R2579/0:
>
> To perform a fee-based action, an entity (the Actor) who is
> othe
The acting on behalf rule is intended to generally specify that an
announcement on behalf of someone is treated like an announcement by that
person. Do you know of some reason that might not work?
-Aris
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 5:28 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I just noticed that, according to
I just noticed that, according to R2579/0:
To perform a fee-based action, an entity (the Actor) who is
otherwise permitted to perform the action must announce that e is
performing the action; the announcement must specify the correct
set of assets for the fee and indicate i
I thought that might be the case but had a nagging feeling that I was
forgetting something.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 13, 2019 8:36 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I don't believe there are any current decisions.
>
> Jason Cobb
>
> On 7/13/19 3:34 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey w
I favour this CFJ, and request that I be added to the list of interested judges.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:11 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> If I CAN do so, I award myself a Transparent ribbon.
>
> - I earned a Red ribbon for proposals earlier this week (81
I don't believe there are any current decisions.
Jason Cobb
On 7/13/19 3:34 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
If doing so causes me to become Jacob Arduino's master, which it should do
unless this is still broken for reasons I don't comprehend, I transfer 87 coins
to Agora.
I act on behalf of Jac
19 matches
Mail list logo
