On 1/19/2020 7:09 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> The vast majority of thesis publications I’ve seen are either legal or
> historical. If anything, this is exactly the sort of thing that shouldn’t
> qualify for a J.N. IMO, it’s about public policy, not rule interpretation.
To me
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 22:13, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I was about to re-reply to say, I don't mind expanding the scope of J.D. at
> all! just that it might warrant some discussion first and it was worth
> mentioning the original intent.
>
I
On 1/19/2020 7:05 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> Ahh, in this case I'll withdraw the intent for now so it can be further
> discussed. But the thinking I had was that the degree is analagous to the
> Juris Doctor conferred to law school graduates who can subsequently go into
>
The vast majority of thesis publications I’ve seen are either legal or
historical. If anything, this is exactly the sort of thing that shouldn’t
qualify for a J.N. IMO, it’s about public policy, not rule interpretation.
-Aris
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 7:05 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
On 1/19/2020 6:40 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> I create the following proposal: {
> Title: Deregistration
> AI: 3
> Author: Gaelan
>
> Flip the Citizenship of the following players to Unregistered:
> - D. Margaux
> - Baron von Vaderham
> }
>
> [They’re both inactive, but
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 6:21 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 20:42, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > What I will not do, barring sufficiently persuasive arguments to the
> >
Okay, that was astonishingly convincing. I’m not going to change my
personal approach to scams (at the very least ones that use my official
position; I don’t think I’ve ever stated on record that I’ll never write a
scam proposal, though I’ve also scrupulously avoided doing so). However,
you have
On 1/19/2020 4:38 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 19:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>> [I'm gonna generally retire from attempting to keep things equal after
>> this,
>> others can if they like.]
>>
>
> Well, I
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 19:28, Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/19/2020 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On 1/19/2020 1:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> +7 G. <= SHOGUN
> >> +6 Aris
> >
> > I pledge to equalize these next week, if no one
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/2020 3:29 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > Twg, can we have the same warranty (in public, to be clear) from you?
> > I phrased it so that it works the same way even with your whole zombie
> >
On 1/19/2020 3:29 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> Twg, can we have the same warranty (in public, to be clear) from you?
> I phrased it so that it works the same way even with your whole zombie
> thing; so you don't need to change any words at all. :) If you don't,
> I intend to
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:06 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
> > many categories. Additionally, I
On 1/19/2020 3:04 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
>> intent," after "past judgements,".
>>
>
>
On 1/19/2020 2:57 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> The best way is to look at past examples.
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 17:43, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> What exactly are the expectations for theses? It's not very well
>>
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
> many categories. Additionally, I dislike this sort of pragmatization.
> The generally platonic model has served Agora
Here's a draft. The actual report will be about a day late; I
sincerely apologize for my tardiness, and I hope the extra day won't
cause significant trouble. Given how big this distribution has turned
out to be, I don't feel comfortable sending this out without a draft
to catch errors.
-Aris
---
My gut feeling is that this is a bit overcomplicated. There are too
many categories. Additionally, I dislike this sort of pragmatization.
The generally platonic model has served Agora well the vast majority
of the time. I don't have extended reasoning here, those are just my
initial reactions.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:14, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Here's some outline I was thinking to move us towards a more pragmatic
> model of law:
>
Any opinions? Buehler?
Agora
Alexis wrote:
> > Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> > intent," after "past judgements,".
>
> Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine
> intent.
Fair enough! Like I said, mostly there to provoke discussion. Would you
feel
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 10:40, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Amend Rule 217, "Interpreting the Rules", by inserting "authorial
> intent," after "past judgements,".
>
Quite opposed; this would require judges to read mailing lists to determine
The best way is to look at past examples.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 17:43, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> What exactly are the expectations for theses? It's not very well
> spelled out in the relevant rule (probably something we should fix).
> I'm
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 17:16, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/18/20 11:07 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ah, I see where we were thinking differently. Yes, I think your idea
> works
> > then, so long as it happens earlier in the
What exactly are the expectations for theses? It's not very well
spelled out in the relevant rule (probably something we should fix).
I'm working on a thesis, on and off, and I want to make sure I'm doing
it right.
-Aris
On 1/18/20 11:07 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ah, I see where we were thinking differently. Yes, I think your idea works
> then, so long as it happens earlier in the week before the officer
> publishes the report and the obligation is live. Once the report is
> published, the
On 1/19/2020 1:45 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> Sigh. My message stated the wrong method (with notice rather than
> without objection). I withdraw the CFJ I just called.
Drat - it would have been a good one!!
I was about to send the following gratuitous:
As part of my Arbitor
On 1/19/2020 1:36 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
> I sent my notice of intent to the players of Agora in two steps:
> first, through myself, and then, through agora-business in this
> message. So, I have sent it via both myself and a public forum. Since
> it was sent via a public
Alexis wrote:
> Repeal rule 2603 or provide a manner for determining the office's holder,
> as there's currently no way for that office to be held.
R1006, last para. It's meant to be a penalty for proposal authors who
define switches without specifying who, if anybody, should track them.
> Amend
27 matches
Mail list logo
