On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:52 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via
agora-discussion wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > I'm *slightly* concerned on this because I think that deputizing for
> > someone who isn't yet late is slightly rude, as the officer should be
> > given discretion on when to do stuff without being pushe
Recently it's come up about which cases are missing from the CFJ
archives. Since missing numbers are hidden on the main CFJ index
page, I thought I'd share this:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/archive_status2020.htm
This is a static snapshot of the tool I use to look for gaps (the li
G. wrote:
> I'm *slightly* concerned on this because I think that deputizing for
> someone who isn't yet late is slightly rude, as the officer should be
> given discretion on when to do stuff without being pushed that hard
> (except for special circumstances).
I don't disagree, but in this case th
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:34 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via
agora-discussion wrote:
> It all depends on whether "If POSSIBLE" means "If currently POSSIBLE"
> or "If POSSIBLE when the requirement was created". I don't see that it's
> 100% unambiguous, but your reading definitely wins on "common sense" a
G. wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:44 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> > G. wrote:
> > > No deputisation needed if there's only 1 candidate, R2154:
> > >
> > > > If at any point an uncontested election has a single candidate,
> > > > then any player CAN by announ
G. wrote:
> No deputisation needed if there's only 1 candidate, R2154:
>
> > If at any point an uncontested election has a single candidate,
> > then any player CAN by announcement declare em the winner of the
> > election, thereby causing em to win the election.
You're correct, but
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 12:49 AM, omd via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 7:23 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official
> wrote:
>> 8287 twg 2.0 Blot Stabilisation
> FOR
>> 8288 omd 1.0 Glitteral
> FOR
>> 8289 Alexis
7 matches
Mail list logo
