If anyone would like to be added to the unofficial list of Watchers in
the weekly Registrar report, please let me know.
See the "Watchers" section at https://agoranomic.org/Registrar/weekly/fresh.txt
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:25, AIS523--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-02-11 at
It’d be interesting to hear the H. Arbitor’s opinion on this. IMO, officers
should use this mechanism iff it’s a substantially new interpretation, so that
we have a log of what we’ve decided about how new rules work, instead of having
to find the threads where we figured it out last time.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 07:34, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I submit this proposal: {
> Title: Calls with Memoranda
> AI: 2
> Co-authors: Aris, G, Alexis
>
> Create a new Power-2 rule titled “Administrative Opinions”: {
> An officer may publish an Administrative Opinion for a
This is missing two of my proposals, which I admittedly submitted rather
late—maybe you intended to distribute them next week? Here they are, in case
you missed them:
{
Title: Calls with Memoranda
AI: 2
Co-authors: Aris, G, Alexis
Create a new Power-2 rule titled “Administrative Opinions”: {
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 00:34, Jason Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> I just realized I can't actually bid in the zombie auction because I
> already have a zombie (oops).
Oops! Thanks, I missed that.
- Falsifian
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 03:19, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> If the number of players participating at a comparable level kept
> increasing, then at some point we might look at splitting off some of
> the discussion to a forum system (even if it was all cc'd to an
> Everything List).
i dont think anyone actually cares if you misnumber some stuff, youve been
doing this job for like three years now lol
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:13 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:54 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:54 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> i would like to know why in god's name have we gone from the 8000s to the
> 3000s with a letter on top, why not use the 9000s???
>
The letters are a result of Proposal 8291, "Interesting Chambers
v3.1". The numbering is a
Would someone please check me on this? I don't trust myself anymore.
-Aris
---
It has come to the attention of the Promotorial Proposal Office that certain
proposals were incorrectly numbered. Twice. I sincerely apologize for this grave
lapse.
All proposals numbered 33## or 35## and distributed
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 04:04, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Aris wrote:
>
> > You might want to check the AI on that?
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 6:13 PM Edward Murphy via agora-business
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Proposal: Fix Auctions
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2549 (Auction
i would like to know why in god's name have we gone from the 8000s to the
3000s with a letter on top, why not use the 9000s???
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:48 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> It has come to the attention of the Promotorial Proposal
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:11 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On 2/12/20 10:18 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> > ID Author(s)AITitle
> > ---
> > 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg
On 2/12/20 10:18 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote:
> ID Author(s)AITitle
> ---
> 8322* Falsifian, Alexis, twg 3.0 Unrepetition v1.1
> 8323* Jason3.0 Secure Ribbons
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 22:04, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Agora, by CFJ 3706, is a contract by nature. It's a contract because of the
> way it exists.
>
> And it's probably still invisible because the Ruleset and all of its
> parties (players) still haven't been posted as a *single*
14 matches
Mail list logo
