On 8/23/20 12:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3877. I assign it to Jason.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3877
>
> === CFJ 3877 ===
>
> One ribbon was awarded in this
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 20:22 -0400, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/25/2020 8:12 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> > The lists were down for about four hours total.
>
> aw man, i had a brilliant, genius, unstoppable scam that i did during
> that time and only could have done during
On 8/25/2020 8:12 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
The lists were down for about four hours total. The VPS hosting the lists
was forcibly shut off due to non-payment (I missed the email with the
invoice). I happened to be actively checking my emails at the time, so I
noticed and paid within
at 11:49 AM, Nathan S via agora-business
wrote:
> Below, contained within the "{}", or curly braces, is the contract
> entitled The Supertask Experiment Redux.
You haven’t exactly stated that you agree to this contract, though I
suppose claiming it exists and has you as a party could be
The lists were down for about four hours total. The VPS hosting the lists
was forcibly shut off due to non-payment (I missed the email with the
invoice). I happened to be actively checking my emails at the time, so I
noticed and paid within half an hour, but then the VPS failed to start back
Well, Margaux is gone, so...
I remove all consent about this contract and I leave this contract.
On Tuesday, August 25, 2020, shelvacu via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I consent to this amended contract.
>
> On 8/19/20 10:35 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
> On Aug 25, 2020, at 12:00 AM, Nathan S via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 8/24/2020 2:14 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
>> I perform the action denoted by curly brackets once for each filled
>> office, where X is that office and Y is the player who holds that office:
>>
>> {
>>
On 8/25/20 2:50 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> You could still amend it to make it work - instead of saying that the
> contract does a thing, say that the contract enables a party to do said
> thing (if that makes any sense). Also, if you are actually done with it
> - as the Notary, the
On 8/25/2020 2:42 PM, Nathan S via agora-business wrote:
On 8/25/2020 11:21 AM, Nathan S wrote:
{
Name: The Supertask Experiment
Parties: Nathan
Only Nathan may be a party to this contract. Nathan may not destroy
this contract. All actions in this contract happen under a "I say, I
do,
On 8/25/2020 6:08 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2168 by replacing the text "Upon such an occurrence" with
> the text "Within two days of such an occurrence"
>
> }
I think 2 days is too short don't want to penalize someone for not being
around on a weekend - 4
On 8/25/20 8:59 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business wrote:
> Hg oh yes please daddy, humiliate me, that's the stuff.
>
> I uh... I vote FOR for those Proposals! I haven't read them but I have full
> faith that they are stellar ideas, yes indeed. Yes.
It's too late...
--
Jason Cobb
On 8/25/20 8:46 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> For each of Proposals 8488 and 8489, I hereby issue a humiliating public
> reminder to each of the following slackers:
>
> omd, Aris, Gaelan, G., Cuddlebeam, nix, PSS, grok, Tyler, Zyborg, R. Lee,
> Fred, Shelvacu, twg, D. Margaux,
I have a hard time believing that everyone would consistently over-shoot
with their expectations of winning - why not under-shoot? Both you and
Gaelan have brought up that people will be like that. I think it's naive to
assume that everyone is going to be that optimistic, inaccurate in
assessing
13 matches
Mail list logo
