On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:25 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 09:01:09PM -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 7:49 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > > Okay, it's reasonable to take advantage of
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 09:01:09PM -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 7:49 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > Okay, it's reasonable to take advantage of precedent that way. Does the
> > precedent actually talk about "free will" in those words?
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 7:49 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Okay, it's reasonable to take advantage of precedent that way. Does the
> precedent actually talk about "free will" in those words?
>
> If it weren't obvious that the word "willingly" is trying to do
> something special in
> > > This version should resolve those problems? (Basically, I swapped out
> > > "freely" for "willingly".)
> >
> > Maybe it works. I wonder if "consciously" would work better.
> >
> > I'm not convinced "willingly" excludes dumb computer programs. E.g. if
> > you made a program that tried to
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 4:09 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 02:34:10PM -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:27 AM Falsifian via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Title: We the People
> > > > Adoption
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 02:34:10PM -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:27 AM Falsifian via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > > Title: We the People
> > > Adoption index: 3.0
> > > Author: Aris
> > > Co-authors: Trigon, nix, G., Gaelan
> > >
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:27 AM Falsifian via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> > Title: We the People
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors: Trigon, nix, G., Gaelan
> >
> >
> > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by replacing:
> >
> > Any entity that is or ever was an
nvm I just remembered that the intent to mislead is crucial to No Faking lol
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:34 AM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> A grat. argument:
>
> By the law of excluded third, I either intend to mislead with that
> statement, or I do not. We don't need to know which stance of those two I
A grat. argument:
By the law of excluded third, I either intend to mislead with that
statement, or I do not. We don't need to know which stance of those two I
hold because in both cases it collapses into a paradox.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:03 AM nix via agora-business <
9 matches
Mail list logo
