Pavitra wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I CFJ on the following sentence. When a judge with judicial rank 0 has
eir judgement overruled on appeal, then it is decreased by 1 and e
CANNOT increase it for 30 days afterward.
Incidentally, this CFJ is trivially FALSE because R2226 says if the
prior
ehird wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2009, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Elliott Hird wrote:
What is the Bill of Attainder proposal's purpose?
To get angry at me for my attempted Grand Poobah scam.
-coppro
Classy.
When you try to scam an office, you should expect reprisals, esp.
coppro wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I can't seem to reach the agoranomic.org archives, but it appears the
lists are still working. Anyone else having this issue?
BobTHJ
Negative.
I just tested the a-o archive and it gave me the first message from this
month without complaint.
Goethe wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Appeal 2656a
Panelist: coppro
Decision:
Panelist: c-walker
Decision:
Panelist: G.
G. wrote:
== CFJ 2651 ==
If I don't receive 15 objections, it will be POSSIBLE for me to
indirectly cause a Rule Change using Contract A.
JUDGE'S
G. wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
AOL!
n.b. this is ineffective (CFJ 1536)
--
-c.
I argue that the existence of CFJ 1536 has made it known enough.
For example, AGAINT is an understandable-enough typo but
G. wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
Whereas it is easiest to obtain a reasonable and consistent judgement
when various facets of the issue are examined independently,
I call for judgement on each of the following statements:
* Causing a rule to act counts as altering it.
* Using a
BobTHJ wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 15:17, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Admitted, but OTOH it isn't a frequent error (most weeks see the same
quorum as the previous week, and most proposals achieve quorum by a
comfortable margin). That said, I'll see about revamping the system
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Quorum8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Voters7 7 7 7 7 6 7
CoE: At the time of the initiation of this decision, there were 21
active players (see the Census published near-concurrently); two
coppro wrote:
Poweriffic Cleanup (AI=3, II=0)
{{{
Amend Rule 1728 by replacing
A person CAN perform a dependent action authorized by a contract
as if that contract were a rule, provided that the above
requirements are otherwise met, and that the effects of that
comex wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
This distribution of proposal 6406 initiates the Agoran
...
Proposal 6403 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by c-walker
Proposal Tweaking Part 2.1
Which proposal is the real 6406?
That one was declared
The Assessor DB now tracks the times of events affecting quorum
(I back-populated it through July 27 or so, enough to confirm that
it got the right results for 6414-20).
I also fixed a bug where it wasn't excluding deregistered players
(the effects of which were less obvious because many such
comex wrote:
Why can't we just have an interface that
- is open-source (so we know what's going on, and can replicate it to
another server if the original one goes down),
I've adjusted my server to make nightly tarballs of the PHP scripts,
which anyone is free to mirror off-site. The only
I wrote:
Ironically, I managed to stomp two scripts (fortunately minor ones,
cotc/notes.php and cotc/case_count.php) in the process of debugging
the syntax...
case_count.php is reconstructed (and includes appeals, which it
didn't previously).
notes.php is reconstructed and renamed to
comex wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6421 D 1 4.0 Pavitra Great Cthulhu
AGAINT
Cute.
comex wrote:
6421 D 1 4.0 Pavitra Great Cthulhu
AGAINT
Note to new players: AGAINT has acquired a more-or-less permanent
taint of ambiguity due to
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1260
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1261
G. wrote:
When do you plan to resolve 6406-6409 (apologies if I missed them).
They were resolved about half an hour ago.
c-walker wrote:
Can someone tell me how the Absolv-o-matic thing ended? Do I still have a
rest?
Recently fixed by Proposal 6409. Yes, I think so.
comex wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
I CFJ on the statement: If I don't receive 15 objections, it will be
POSSIBLE for me to indirectly cause a Rule Change using Contract A.
I favor this case. -G.
Can you
coppro wrote:
A very broken system. As the criminal rules are written, you don't even
need to actually believe you were in the right, it just needs to be
reasonable for you to have done so. I completely support criminal reform
(N.B. my reform proposal would not have repaired this error) as
BobTHJ wrote:
Actually, I retract this. I don't see where the Assessor has a weekly
report (or am I missing something?). If so then Murphy got some extra
deals out of this (which isn't a big deal, but makes a difference
going forward).
No, eir report is entirely monthly. Eir non-report
coppro wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 14:10, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Support, to publish an NoV alleging that ais523 violated
the 1-power Rule 2143 by failing to report the Recognition switch during
the month of July.
I intend, with 2 Support, to
BobTHJ wrote:
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - NOV #3 - coppro accuses coppro of rule/crime
R2168 with a severity of 1 because: Anarchist election notice
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - coppro closes NOV #3, 1 rests created in
coppro's possession
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:36 - coppro plays Absolv-o-Matic to
Sgeo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Non-recordkeepors, however, won't.
Actually, it will be a positive pain for recordkeepors (searching
coppro wrote:
Warrigal wrote:
My voting limit on an ordinary decision initiated at this time would
exceed the combined voting limits of all other players on that
decision.
I intend, with support, to publish an NoV accusing Warrigal of violating
the 2-power Rule 2215 by publishing the quoted
comex wrote:
Note that Rule 1728 takes precedence over Rule 2140 (Power Controls
Mutability), so any issue of the power of the contract is moot.
No, it isn't moot. Rule 1728 pretends that the contract is a rule,
but it doesn't pretend that it has Power 0.
ehird wrote:
2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 yd17.ag...@gmail.com:
comex wrote:
2009/8/4 yuri_dragon_17 yd17.ag...@gmail.com:
yuri_dragon_17 wrote:
ฉันลงทะเบียน
Some players suggested that to make things easier I should register
unambiguously. So,
I register.
BobTHJ wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:38, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pavitracelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to reopen my not-really-a-proposal to split a-b into two
mailing lists.
One would be a high-signal list where contentful actions
coppro wrote:
I hereby initiate a Straw Poll to decide whether or not the
Distributor should add another forum (tentatively with the name
agora-business) to the agoranomic.org lists, and the Registrar should
s/business/actions/
subsequently make it Public. The valid options are FOR, AGAINST,
Pavitra wrote:
As a supplement/alternative, what would people think of criminalizing
large numbers of public messages -- say, 8 or 16 per person per week? It
wouldn't platonically cancel any messages, and it should encourage
people to lump their actions together. On the other hand, it might
Wooble wrote:
2009/8/3 yuri_dragon_17 yd17.ag...@gmail.com:
©Ñ¹Å§·ÐàºÕ¹
According to Google translate, Thai for I register.
Gratuitous arguments for the CFJ: I was unable to verify this claim.
Edmond Dantes wrote:
I register.
Hi, do you have a preferred nickname?
I have no idea what's going on.
Here's a copy of the greeting I sent JonnyRotten earlier today:
Welcome to the Agoran community! http://agoranomic.org/ offers a
good set of initial pointers, here are a few
G. wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Please let us know what additional questions you have.
Was there a reference to your recent FAQ and ais523's thesis in these
links? (I missed them if there were). -G.
Nope, here they are:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private
coppro wrote:
6415 O 1 1.0 Wooble So much for that
FOR x 12
Your voting limit is back to 8 (unless I missed a card play).
coppro wrote:
I spend an Absolve-o-matic (sp) to destroy a Rest in my own possession.
TTttPF
As a few of us have recently found out, Absolv-o-Matic is ineffective
because its rule has too low Power to satisfy securing of Rest changes.
G. wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
1. Caste is also secured-2 so no dice.
Well, playing the cards ineffectually to get them out of my hand works too.
R2256 is pretty clear here:
If the
coppro wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
coppro 6 5 8 5 1 4 3 9 5 17 3 1
I mill 0 - 7 = 4.
I mill 9 - 3 = 6.
I mill 7 * 4 = 6.
I harvest 2643 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2637 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2639 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 2638 for 2 WRVs.
I harvest 955 for 8
Wooble wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
Fails, Absolve-o-matics are broken atm.
--
ais523
I think quorum is such that you could fix it personally by voting FOR
6409 right now (and if you feel like it,
ais523 wrote:
genuine paradoxes (e.g. the 'paradox win', which strangely appears to
have no attached CFJ (were the relevant rules different back then),
about assigning Goethe to CFJ 1596; just because there are two
Yes, per http://agora.qoid.us/rule/2110 (side note: messy, evidently
Pavitra wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with these arguments. It seems perfectly
straightforward to me.
Can someone direct me to the explanation of why this is wrong?
Whatever was pointed out to coppro was apparently not done on either
a-b or a-d; possibly it occurred in ##nomic.
comex wrote:
At the extreme, I remember
watching the creation, under a scamming organization called the
cabal, of a fake sub-cabal as a way to trick other players into
participating in a scam believing they were participating in a
different one.
Which scam was that?
Taral wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6403 D 1 3.0 coppro Your Presence is Requested
FOR
6404 D 0 2.0 Murphy Fix expedited recusal
FOR
6405 D 3 3.0 coppro
C-walker wrote:
I vote as follows a number of times equal to my voting limit on each decision:
[snip]
6406 D2 2.0 c-walkerProposal Tweaking Part 2.1
FOR
Ineffective, you already did so before.
Taral wrote:
6412 O 1 1.0 allispaul A Standard Standard
AGAINSTx3
I have your caste recorded as 2.
This is going in the right direction:
http://nomic.bob-space.com/agoralog.aspx?contract=All%20Decks
Recommendations to make this reasonably usable:
* Add as of date near the top
* Allow adding player=Murphy for the obvious effect
* Include inline descriptions of what each card does
G. wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Proto-proto: Replace pending draws with Chips, which can then be
traded per the usual currency rules.
Noo.
Why not?
ehird wrote:
2009/7/29 ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk:
It isn't my website, and I hate it too. The issue is that there's no
easy legal way to get all the data off it, due to Wikidot's terms of
service (recently amended to say that you can't try to get rid of that
annoying banner at the
Quazie wrote:
I vote present on proposals 6403-6406 if possible.
It isn't, you were inactive when they were distributed. You'll be
able to vote again starting with 6414.
Quazie wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2638
Am i certainly active at this point? if i'm not, can i be a judge?
I think you are, but you should re-announce it without pseudocode to
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 20:47 +0100, C-walker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
No one submitted a guess within the required timeframe.
I intend, without 3 objections, to flip
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Patent Title Security Cleanup (AI=1.5, II=0)
{{{
Amend Rule 649 (Patent Titles) by replacing Awarding or revoking a
Patent Title by Proposal is a secured change. with Awarding or
revoking a Patent Title can only be done by a proposal with power
coppro wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
That's how it works now. Awarding or revoking a Patent Title by means
other than a proposal is (by omission) not secured, and thus governed
only by the earlier sentence.
My interpretation is that the intent is not to secure patent titles but
rather to make
G. wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
G. wrote:
None were particularly compelling. Like Notes, the overhead of choosing
one's location etc. was just More Trouble Than It Was Worth. It's not
that your proto is bad, it's just that it's similar and for some reason,
the past ones
All proposals recorded as resolved within the past two weeks:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/assessor/notes.php
All judicial cases recorded as judged on time within the past
two weeks:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/notes.php
Despite the repeal of Notes, these may continue to be generally
G. wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
No, really. The grid in this case would just be for visual
representation, and wouldn't really need to be a grid at all (forget
any previous poor execution of a grid in other not-to-be-named nomics
- B)
Agora has had three grids since 2001
coppro wrote:
Patent Title Security Cleanup (AI=1.5, II=0)
{{{
Amend Rule 649 (Patent Titles) by replacing Awarding or revoking a
Patent Title by Proposal is a secured change. with Awarding or
revoking a Patent Title can only be done by a proposal with power 1.5 or
greater.
[This change,
coppro wrote:
I guess 3 proposals and 11 CFJs
NttPF
c-walker wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/7/20 C-walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
C-walker
Statements made in this message may or may not be false
I think this is nullifying all your messages; don't we have precedent on
coppro wrote:
Note, however, that there is actually another possibility here: that the
rule actuall restricts all communications and thus failed due to AIAN
(see ##nomic logs for in-depth discussion; it's a DF so I shouldn't have
to repeat what was said there).
I don't think this defense
coppro wrote:
Explanation: Distributed Proposal 6402 enacts a new Rule Acting on
Behalf that says Acting on behalf of (syn. send messages on behalf of)
a person (the grantor) with a specified message is equivalent to sending
a public message authored by the grantor. Equivalence, as used in
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 16:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:23 PM, ais523callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Ineffective, CoEs have to be done publically, which is secured at power
3, and no sufficiently powerful rule lets you do that.
I Say This Is The
c-walker wrote:
I guess 9 proposals and 12 CFJs for this week.
Ineffective, too late in the week.
c-walker wrote:
Murphy wrote:
c-walker wrote:
I guess 9 proposals and 12 CFJs for this week.
Ineffective, too late in the week.
I guess 9 proposals and 12 CFJs for the next week in which I can guess.
That doesn't work either.
Wooble wrote:
I guess 6 proposals, 9 CFJs
Invalid, guesses must now be in by the end of Friday (UTC).
BobTHJ wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 19:04, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I supply a hefty bribe from my nonexistent pot of currency to make
sure that the new system is as little like the previous one as
possible?
G. wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I come off hold. I Form a Government as follows:
I go on hold. I come off hold. I Form a Government as follows:
Ooh, that's a nice little bug. And a sum of unintended consequences
rather than just a straightforward bad card proposal
coppro wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:08, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend (with 2 support) to appeal. A request to set a rule AI to
Sgeo wrote:
Maybe a contract allowing me to gain some benefit from your win? I was
initially thinking maybe I could sometimes act on your behalf to use
the power of whatever position card you gain, but you already have a
position card..
Maybe I could transfer you my existing position card
Sgeo wrote:
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=21692852114ref=ts
Might we want to open relations with them?
Looks like they've been inactive for a couple months, and for some
long stretches before that as well.
c-walker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== Equity Case 2606 ==
I accidentally published the list of what contracts are what and
Wooble wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The Speaker CAN form a government this quarter if e desires.
H. Assessor Murphy, is there any chance you could fix
http://zenith.homelinux.net/assessor/similarity.php to make it easier
to reward people
c-walker wrote:
I CFJ {{ The Conductor CAN publish a self-ratifying report. }}
Evidence:
R2126 states:
The Conductor is an office. As soon as possible after this text
becomes a part of this rule, the Conductor SHALL publish a
self-ratifying report containing the
Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Sgeo wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Murphy ROGCBK MUVIY 11
How much would Murphy be willing to give me in order for me to name em
as my
coppro wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
A player CAN publish a Notice of Violation (with N support,
I've never liked this bit. Unless the Distributor blocks me, I CAN
publish whatever
Wooble wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm treating this as ineffective (game custom to the contrary
notwithstanding), and I publish an NoV alleging that C-walker
G. wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 15:15 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:12 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I deputize for the IADOP to initiate an Agoran Decision to determine the
new officeholder of the Grand
ais523 wrote:
Cretans doesn't hold here, the rule doesn't claim precedence over
itself. (Maybe it should be generalised to all self-contradictions?) The
current holder here is interesting; my reading is holder at the time
of vote collecting. It doesn't seem ridiculously counter-common-sense
coppro wrote:
On Sunday, July 5, 2009, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I opine REMAND in CFJ 2510a, in order to allow the judge to consider the
further arguments that have been advanced since e published eir original
judgement.
As do I, deferring to Pavitra's arguments.
ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606
== Equity Case 2606 ==
This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to
keep the total
teucer wrote:
music-currency [which can only mean Notes, in this context] to .kreig.
[which is the Lojban form of my real name, and the name by which I am
known in the Lojban community], who is .tefkros. [my preferred
Lojbanization of teucer, based on the original Greek form of said
name,
ais523 wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 12:53 -0400, comex wrote:
I rotate the bench.
I believe you just violated the public contract (2008-11-22-ehird) by
rotating the bench without intending to mislead others as to the
pointless conceptual games indulged in by mistake; but I'm not a party
Taral wrote:
Would anyone care to propose a reasonable settlement? It seems like
nobody really minded -- the game just started over. Mistakes happen.
Null judgement. If any party does mind, they can appeal.
coppro wrote:
On Thursday, July 2, 2009, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 08:32, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Bahahahaha! I initiate an equity case regarding that
compsciguy wrote:
Checked the short and full rulesets, and I can't find it anywhere. What
is the LPRS?
A fair amount of gameplay is governed by contracts rather than
rules. In this case, see
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/lesser-points-relay-service
Warrigal wrote:
I act on behalf of ə to register ə.
I figured out how to get this into the database, but why does
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/status.php (newly modified to
specify charset=utf-8 rather than charset=iso-8859-1) render it
incorrectly by default? Here's the main part of the
c-walker wrote:
I guess 8 CFJs for the next week for which I haven't already guessed.
NttPF.
Murphy, does the proposal guessing system work by the number submitted
or the number distributed?
4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
at most 5 proposals per author
ehird wrote:
2009/6/29 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I object. Activity is needed because, in the case of non-embassy
But what about
Fnord!
G. wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
On a partially-related note, all elections should include a VACANT
option. Or perhaps only if someone 'nominates' it? Vacant-option with 3
support?
EMPTY THRONE
Why? What if this happened to e. g. the Promotor?
On one hand it's
allispaul wrote:
First, you want to flip the contract's *Disclosure*, not *Publicity*, to
Public.
I CFJ {The Grid's Disclosure has been flipped.}
NttPF
G. wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I initiate an election for Conductor, nominating myself (and grumbling).
I haven't read the Cards proto yet; will it allow the equivalent of
Conductor to be split among
Yally wrote:
Any player CAN, by announcement, initiate an election for a
specified elected office that is vacant, or for which no
election has been initiated in the preceding 90 days, or at any
time if e is the IADoP for which no election is already in
progress.
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:29 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
G. wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
6372 D 1 2.0 G. Transition Team
AGAINST
I'm a little puzzled by opposition to this (not just on your part, other
voters too...) is there a bug I'm
G. wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Judge allispaul's Arguments:
Importantly, a valid Notice of Violation has the
effects it describes. CFJ 2481 and the associated cases are of note
here: though the NoV's in question were certainly incorrect, they were
valid and had the effect
Yally wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:19 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
On 6369, c-walker endorsed the contestmaster who awarded the most
points in May. By my count, the totals by contest were
xy contest
29 36 3
G. wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
Appeal 2574a
Panelist: G.
Decision: OVERRULE/FALSE
Panelist: Quazie
Decision
c-walker wrote:
There exists a 2D Grid which consists of 10,000 Squares from (0, 0) to
(100, 100). There is a Square switch called Colour with possible
Off-by-one error. Also, previous large grids have suffered from
players failing to move near each other; a small grid would leave
them little
G. wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
6372 D 1 2.0 G. Transition Team
AGAINST
I'm a little puzzled by opposition to this (not just on your part, other
voters too...) is there a bug I'm missing? Because to me this one seemed
like a straightforward this
G. wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
MINISTERS WITHOUT PORTFOLIO
comex27-Feb-09 - Speaker
OscarMeyr24-Mar-09
ais5236-Apr-09
coppro3-May-09
I wrote:
Wooble kicks out comex (longest MWoP)
For reference, Wooble deputised to award emself MWoP in a-b on
Wed, 20 May 2009 21:50:04 -0400; root deregistered May 26.
Tiger kicks out root (deregistered)
Murphy kicks out OscarMeyr (inactive)
comex kicks out ais523 (longest MWoP),
coppro wrote:
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which Pavitra has not
yet voted, I act on eir behalf to cast the vote that an endorsement of
me would evaluate to if the election were to finish right now.
For each Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal on which c-walker has not
901 - 1000 of 3133 matches
Mail list logo
