Yes, I should be available at that time.
Blob
On 01/07/2013, at 12:02 AM, Charles Walker wrote:
On 30 June 2013 14:48, Steven Gardner steven.gard...@monash.edu wrote:
For my part, 9pm local time (1100 UTC), after the kids are in bed, is when
I'm more likely to have time to chat.
But
I'd say the coalition had its seeds in my first message to Steve, passing on
the Agora XX invitation. Our first question was how are we going to win this?
I'd like to echo my thanks to all involved. Good times.
Malcolm
On 01/07/2013, at 3:14 AM, Fool wrote:
I've hosted and played in
Ørjan, hello!
Blob
On 29/06/2013, at 12:50 AM, Chuck Carroll games...@chuckcarroll.org wrote:
Hi!
-Original Message-
From: agora-discussion [mailto:agora-discussion-boun...@agoranomic.org] On
Behalf Of Ørjan Johansen
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 9:58 AM
To: Agora Discussion List
If I am to be hoisted, it will be *with* my petard, not by it.
For ’tis the sport to have the engineer
Hoist with his own petard:
-- Hamlet Act III, Scene IV
Blob (exploding pedant)
On 29/06/2013, at 10:18 AM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/06/2013 7:43 PM, Steven Gardner wrote:
I call for judgement on the following statement.
Blob does not have to forfeit under rule 345.
Reasoning:
Rule 345 says If a player proposes a rule change that is not adopted...
I made proposal 346 BEFORE this rule came into effect. Rule 108 forbids
retroactive application.
Blob
On
I call for judgment on the following statement:
At the 12:16am GMT on June 28 2013, Blob had not forfeited.
Reasoning: The rules make it clear that forfeiting is a voluntary player
action. Rule 345 says a player must forfeit. It does not say that they are
deemed to have forfeited.
Blob
On
Oh, Goethe has already CFJ'ed this. Oops.
Blob (on the lam)
On 28/06/2013, at 10:19 AM, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
I call for judgment on the following statement:
At the 12:16am GMT on June 28 2013, Blob had not forfeited.
Reasoning: The rules make it clear that forfeiting is a voluntary player
Aand we return to the old Platonic vs Pragmatic debate.
Blob (staying low)
On 28/06/2013, at 11:06 AM, Fool wrote:
On 27/06/2013 8:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Of course, this raises the age old question of whether, if e does an
illegal thing, whether it actually fails (since we haven't
Jun 2013, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
Aand we return to the old Platonic vs Pragmatic debate.
that has plagued Agora for a looong time...
Oh, and remind me next year to come up with a Drinking Game for
observers.
1. Drink if platonic versus pragmatic comes up.
2. Drink if there's
Ah nuts.
M
On 26/06/2013, at 6:59 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
On 26 Jun 2013, at 04:57, Malcolm Ryan malco...@cse.unsw.edu.au wrote:
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
Any player who proposes to amend, renumber or repeal rule 311 is deemed to
have forfeited the game.
I vote
I vote FOR.
M
On 25/06/2013, at 12:11 AM, Steven Gardner wrote:
I vote for this Proposal.
On 25 June 2013 00:10, Steven Gardner steven.gard...@monash.edu wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Enact a new Rule which reads:
Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker
By the way, while I'm here I've been meaning to come back to Agora sometime to
get my Doctor of Nomic. Do you still have degrees? What do I have to do to be
awarded one?
Malcolm
design and run the games lab at my
university, and my Agora experience was actually a great stepping stone to my
current position. I'd love to include an Agoran degree on my resumé.
Malcolm
On 26/06/2013, at 8:20 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:13 +1000, Malcolm Ryan wrote
I used the word forfeit because it is already used in rule 113.
Blob
On 26/06/2013, at 11:20 PM, Michael Norrish wrote:
I vote AGAINST 345 and 346 (what does forfeit mean, and does it prevent
reregistration?)
I vote FOR 344.
Michael
On 26/06/13 10:00 PM, Fool wrote:
Here I'll just
I'm late to the party, but better late than never.
I register for Agora XX.
Malcolm
(aka Blob)
I disagree. There is no such thing as a proposal only a proposed rule
change. I put it that this is a shorthand way of making 38 proposed rule
changes.
Malcolm
On 23/06/2013, at 12:17 AM, Fool wrote:
On 22/06/2013 9:45 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
I propose that all rules be transmuted to
I vote FOR both of these.
M
On 26/06/2013, at 10:56 AM, Fool wrote:
Here I'll just number and repeat the two new proposals. Voting closes
in 24 hours. Voting on 331-341 closes in about 11 hours.
-Dan
342 (Chuck):
I propose that rule 311 be amended by changing the text which reads “the
Let's make this interesting.
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game.
M
Naturally, I vote FOR this.
On 26/06/2013, at 1:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan wrote:
Let's make this interesting.
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its
voting period, that player must immediately forfeit the game.
M
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
Any player who proposes to amend, renumber or repeal rule 311 is deemed to
have forfeited the game.
I vote FOR this.
M
You youngsters got no guts. In my day we played fer KEEPS.
M
On 26/06/2013, at 1:37 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Malcolm Ryan malco...@cse.unsw.edu.au
wrote:
Let's make this interesting.
I propose that a rule be enacted reading:
If a player proposes
21 matches
Mail list logo
