On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
=
THE SCROLL OF AGORA
=
Last report: Tue, 19 Jun 2012
Recent Activity:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Roger Hicks wrote:
Anarchy scshunt
Pseudo-CoE: Shouldn't the President be on the list of Champion holders?
E is, lower down, under Via Ratification.
That's a category I'm
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Benjamin Schultz
ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
Both are acceptable usage. One may file/submit a motion to do
something (useful in courts); one may move to do something (useful in
assemblies). But one never motions to do something.
Unless you are a Jedi...
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Restrict it to casting votes?
It should be legal for non-rules defined actions as well. I could see
this mechanism being useful for contracts/contests/promises/whatever
form of binding agreements exist presently.
BobTHJ
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The Rules may specify a date or event after which a particular
type of Cypher becomes Declassified; with a default of as soon as
possible after the Cypher is first published. As soon as possible
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
then the encoding is
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:12, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2011 17:22, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ok start at the endpoint. What items of value are we selling? Anything
other than the trifecta of voting power, proposal distributing, and
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 14:10, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2011 20:44, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Yeah, except as discussed many many times, if you can get almost anything
else but that anything else isn't specified, you just sit around and
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 14:23, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2011 21:21, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Another idea is to let players use large quantities of currency to buy
their way out of official duties. New players would (as a result
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 14:28, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2011 20:50, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Seeds decay (hoarding only semi-successful). If decay
is exponential there can be a steady state but with bursts.
Finally, every so often
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 15:43, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Elliott Hird wrote:
i.e., incentives for officekeeping only work if you can hoard the
spoils and use them for your dastardly, dastardly* deeds in the
future.
I think you misunderstand, by the way.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 17:39, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
I transfer a proposal from myself to ehird.
Oooh, turning proposals into assets. Now *there's* an idea.
I had an unpublished draft proposal a while back that did similar with
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:40, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Roger Hicks wrote:
6961 O 1 3.0 G. 52-pickup v2
AGAINST (like the President bit, but I'm opposed to wisespread
repeals. If you're getting rid of something it should be because
This was in my drafts folder from the last time I was playing, back
when there were dozens of contracts floating around. The intent here
was to allow a contract to transclude sections of other contracts,
thus allowing the elimination of mot of the boilerplate that was in
even trivial contracts.
I'll likely wait to propose this until after the current scam(s) have
been resolved and the gamestate can be quantified (as I re-registered
mid-scam and don't care to sort it out). I am open to suggestions for
additional achievements, or better (more-punny) names, as well as
general comments and
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 13:03, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll likely wait to propose this until after the current scam(s) have
been resolved and the gamestate can be quantified (as I re-registered
mid-scam and don't
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 05:33, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 5 January 2011 07:01, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is no objection, yes, it can be raised.
I object to 1 megabyte messages; perhaps 512 kilobytes at the maximum?
I find this to be a reasonable
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 01:19, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Registrar's Census
Fri 04 Mar 00:00 BobTHJ becomes a Senator
I thought Senator persisted through deregistration?
Proto: When a player who was once a Senator registers he becomes a
Senator again.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 22:19, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
Way to bypass the size limit. =)
~ Roujo
Way to bypass a limit that does not need to be bypassed, as e could
have just asked Taral?
Could the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 13:28, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Players are encouraged (in the ordinary-language sense) to take
advantage of these definitions to carry out scams which would be
illegal or impossible on other days. However, scams SHOULD NOT
be carried out which
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 16:50, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 6648 - 6668:
I'm saddened that I didn't come back sooner. I could have voted
against the repeal of contracts. Did it pass by a large margin?
BobTHJ
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 00:44, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby register.
- woggle
Welcome back!
BobTHJ
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 15:50, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/02/2010 12:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Gratuitous: As previous judge I request REASSIGN -- I think I've been
responsible for a lot of the official (rather than gratuitous) precedents
on personhood and it would be good to
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 01:58, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 21:24 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
=== Equity Case 2732 (Interest Index = 0)
BobTHJ abused eir position as Secretary of
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 16:55, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I apologize in advance the insulator weekly report will be a little late
(I hope 24 hours). I just noticed BobTHJ missed a few rest actions that
happened just before eir pseudo-report so I want to check back to the
Oct
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:53, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Wooble wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Wooble 13 Fugitive Can't Register
I believe these were all destroyed by proposal.
If they weren't otherwise
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 15:09, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/11/9 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
I have decided to cease maintaining nomic.bob-space.com and step back
from Agora for a bit.
I have a strange feeling of déjà vu...
Ahh, ehirdI knew you wouldn't let
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 16:11, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
It's less than one week of backlog, FYI.
BobTHJ
Two. Your last reports were on October 26, except for your posting of
what cards people were owed (a reminder to recordkeepors, including
myself, that draws earned need to be
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 16:36, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Accountor Assets monthly 2009-09-06 Overdue
Anarchist Anarchy Attempts monthly 2009-09-04 Overdue
Accountor
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 21:49, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
Reflects actions up to and including Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:50
Agoran Agricultural Association
CoE: This whole report is inaccurate as it purports actions that were never
performed.
Care to explain?
BobTHJ
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:29, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Care to explain?
BobTHJ
I explained with my last CoE but I just realized I only CoEd my
holdings, not everyone. You recorded events as if the mere act
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 15:13, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, platonic.
-coppro
I mill
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:04, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I harvest 2719, 2720, 2721, 2722, 2723, 2724, 2725, 2726 and 2727 for 18 WRV.
In ascending order, I harvest as many of these as I can for 2 WRV each
(note that I already harvested 2726 and 2727).
(4433) Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:04 -
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:46, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:04, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I harvest 2719, 2720, 2721, 2722, 2723, 2724, 2725, 2726 and 2727 for 18
WRV
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:58, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
CoE: AAA actions are not, and to my knowledge have never been, platonic.
I'm not understanding the nature of your CoE, can you clarify?
BobTHJ
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 14:02, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 13:58, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
coppro 2 12 0 20 12 17 12 21 24 22 0 14
CoE: AAA actions
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 15:35, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:45 - The office of Ambassador becomes assumable
I don't believe this is in the right report.
Yes. A flaw in my design. Since an office becoming assumable is a
triggered response to another action (one which
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 13:44, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Walker 10
Wooble 7 Change Justice Justice Government
I intend, with the support of the people
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 16:30, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have a copy of the card history on your website not trimmed to
the last month?
You can use the following variables in the querystring:
time - specify an integer number of days, the history section will
include the specified
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 16:47, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 16:30, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have a copy of the card history on your website not trimmed to
the last month?
You can use the following variables in the querystring:
time - specify
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:31, Alex Smith callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
--- On Sun, 25/10/09, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose. One point is that it would be nice to
limit mousetraps to
impose unfair obligations, not I can act on behalf of
you to steal
all your assets and
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:28, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
2721: GUILTY / APOLOGY
2722: GUILTY / DISCHARGE
2723: GUILTY / DISCHARGE
Technically GUILTY, but for the various reasons cited, an APOLOGY
should be sufficient - provided that it isn't phoned in this time.
For
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 23:47, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
As allowed
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 18:37, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
in which I realize that Stool Pigeon and Shrink Potion were both
assigned the abbreviation SP, causing my automation to charge Shrink
Potion's rate for Stool Pigeons..
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:38, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:24 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's pretty clear that CFJ 2720 has found an instance of
Admiral of the Navy
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 16:37, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 6522 - 6531:
[This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
following proposals. For each decision, the options available to
Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:09, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:35 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Proto: The Citrine Repeals
I agree; the game has gotten too complex and especially focused on
minor issues with the rules, etc. But I would support even
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:35, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Proto: The Citrine Repeals
[We've had too many deregistrations lately (some my fault, I guess)
Were a proposal like this to go through, I would likely deregister.
I've spent countless hours working to model Agora as it stands
Add a new card to the deck of change:
Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the LFD. Those
assets are transferred to you.
BobTHJ
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 19:32, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
If I have at least as many Distrib-u-Matics as undistributable proposals
in the pool, then for each such proposal, I play Distrib-u-Matic to make
it distributable.
Having worked things back
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:50, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Add a new card to the deck of change:
Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the LFD. Those
assets are transferred to you
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:59, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I repeat the following action 24 times:
- I create one rest in BobTHJ's possession (as allowed by Rule 1504,
due to CFJ 2674).
Well, that was fun.
BobTHJ
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
For each of the following proposals, I intend
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:26, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
Distrib-u-Matic
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:31, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I object to all pending attempts to make
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 13:45, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
===
Industrial Bank Agora Report
Date of this report: 19 October 2009
President of the IBA: comex
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 17:04, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
And then, to ensure I meet the 200 word minimum, I wish to include the
following (which I would have written by hand on a chalkboard, but
copy/paste was easier
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:26, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been thinking for a while about setting up a contest which is a
nomic or
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 17:26, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 6:15 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been pointed out to me that I'm violating the rules by not
reporting on the
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:00, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
(If card recordkeeping isn't caught up soon, then I suggest a deputy
Promotor distribute everything and plead for DISCHARGE if e thereby
breaks Rule 1607. Better that than a stagnant pool.)
I'm back in the office today and
I lost track of the gamestate.was ais523's attempt to
destroy/transfer Murphy's Distrib-u-Matics successful? (and could
someone point me to the CFJ this hinged upon?) I'm busily working to
bring my recordkeeping up to date so I can issue reports.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 15:28, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
If I have at least as many Distrib-u-Matics as undistributable proposals
in the pool, then for each such proposal, I play Distrib-u-Matic to make
it distributable.
H. Former-Promotor Wooble, any chance you could let me know
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 13:20, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:40 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 11:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
I lost track of the gamestate.was ais523's attempt to
destroy/transfer Murphy's Distrib-u
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 13:37, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed, e certainly has 0 Distrib-u-Matics at the moment. I'm not
waiting on this to finish my updating, I just was hoping to get a
clear answer so we knew
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 13:13, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c. wrote:
iii. Every person has the right to refuse to become party to a
binding agreement, and the privilege to refuse to be bound
by amendment to an agreement. In the case of becoming a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 16:54, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that I'm not advocating removing penalties for mis-performing or
non-performing officers. They need to be retained for cases of gross
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:27, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
When any other entity is audited the auditing entity (or the Accountor
if the auditing entity is a non-person) CAN and SHALL as soon as
possible
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:26, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
It matters when the person we elect as recordkeepor uses someone
else's broken
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:34, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Address: what if the auditing entity is a non-person?
A non-person shouldn't be able to hold one of the Dealor offices or
take an action
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:12, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Irrelevant. The audit rule specifically attempts to address what would
occur if there is no auditing entity (and by this we can only infer
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:35, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Acting on behalf of Grand Poobah (if required): {
coppro is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Government:
Lobbyist
}
Reason: Janitor weekly salary
Fails, I wasn't the Janitor for last
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:55, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
For the week beginning Oct 12. Unless I recorded the date wrong you
assumed the office of Janitor shortly before the new-week rollover:
Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:33 - coppro assumes the office of Janitor
BobTHJ
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:59, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 13:45, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2230, a Power-2
Rule, by failing to announce publicly the validity of the NoV identified
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 17:25, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I initiate a Motion To Effect, specifying the following Rate List:
Distrib-u-Matic: 55
I vote AGAINST. I think this would stomp all
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 15:25, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
After reading it again, I see how it could be interpreted differently
(and the way you suggest is probably the intent of the rule), however
when I
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempted and failed to audit ais523 for the
Government deck; e never attempted Change or
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:16, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 19:39, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Read the audit rule again. Each audit of the LFD started a new ASAP
time limit for me to destroy cards (I have it in my queue for the next
automated
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 22:10, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
When any other entity is audited, the auditing entity (or, if
there is none, the Accountor) CAN and SHALL by announcement
destroy X of eir cards
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:21, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Selling: 100zm
For Cost: Play Absolv-o-Matic specifying BobTHJ
Repeats: 3
I fill the above quoted offer, doing the following:
I spend
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:52, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
I don't believe so. BobTHJ
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:40, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend to deputise for the dealer of each basic deck to audit the
appropriate entities.
I totally forgot about thiscoming up shortly.
BobTHJ
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 13:51, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Suggestion: On nomic.bob-space.com, each player report includes that
player's Hand Limit, total number of Cards owned from each Deck (and
total number of cards owned overall), and number of Cards they are
over
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:22, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I deregister the LNP.
Fails. The LNP is still a person for 7 days following c.'s departure.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 15:22, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 16:20 -0500, pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Acting on behalf of AAA (if required): {
The AAA isn't a person. First coppro trying to act on behalf of
non-persons, now you; what is the world coming to?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 16:27, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I CFJ (II=1) { A Government was Formed on September 1.}
On September 1, Wooble assigned the Major Arcana cards to various
players. It was not at the time defined as Forming a Government,
however, the action was effectively
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 13:06, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Acting on behalf of Grand Poobah (if required): {
coppro is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Government:
Government Ball, Kill Bill
}
Reason: monthly salary
I deposit to the IBA a Government Ball, and ask BobTHJ
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 06:46, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following AI-2 proposal, No Rest Multiplication:
{{
In Rule 2262, replace:
* Stool Pigeon - Indicate a player who has not been
indicated for this card within the last 72
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 21:10, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate an election for Accountor.
I initiate an election for Janitor.
Can you (without playing No Confidence)? You're not the IADoP anymore.
BobTHJ
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 13:12, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
This was supposed to be sent as part of my recent automated action
e-mail but there must be a bug:
I award the patent title Champion to coppro
I award
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:41, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
N.B. auditing the IBA doesn't create rests, it just destroys cards.
Didn't notice that changed with coppro's revision.
BobTHJ
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm.
This fails, you have no X crops to deposit.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 23:01, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
== CFJ 2695 ==
c. awarded emself 70 x-points via the Contract B contest.
Caller's
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 18:15, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I join Scumbuddies and change my membership to full.
-coppro
Did comex and ais523 grant their consent? of not this was unsuccessful.
BobTHJ
Notes:
1. I have revised the acting on behalf wording in hopes of bringing
it in compliance with the current ruleset. Please let me know if you
think the new updated wording is ineffective.
2. I mistakenly attempted to revoke points and issue a digit ranch to
Taral. This obviously failed.
3.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:27, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Acting on behalf of Grand Poobah (if required): {
Darth Cliche is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Government:
Arm-Twist, Roll Call
}
This fails.
Why?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:40, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule,
by having made a public statement on a matter relevant
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 00:50, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
This judge's opinion is that such a Hard Deregistration is exercised
by the player ceasing to be involved in the Agoran forums and
essentially ignoring the game. When such occurs, R101 vii
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:53, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 00:50, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough with my arguments. Short of physically
hiring a police force (or bruiser
1 - 100 of 1290 matches
Mail list logo
