On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CFJ, disqualifying Tanner L. Swett: In the message quoted in
evidence, Tanner L. Swett gained at least one erg.
I don't think you've assigned this CFJ yet. Do you intend to?
—Tanner L. Swett
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
=== CFJ 2888 (Interest Index = 0)
Judge: Tanner L. Swett
CoE, accepted: this was ineffective, Tanner was supine (I hadn't
yet updated the DB to be
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered
indeterminate, regardless of how they would come out if we attempted
to break them apart?
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement
2010/10/11 com...@gmail.com:
That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly.
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of the following string (expect with the
number 3000 incremented), followed by a quotation mark,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote:
CfJ:The second NoV quoted below is not valid
Arguments: According to Rule 2230, A NoV is valid if and only if... no
previous valid NoV specified substantially identical information (i.e. the
same violation for the same
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
I resign all my offices and go on hold.
(What happens with the speaker office now?)
I think that since the office of the Speaker is Imposed, you cannot resign it.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:46 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby invoke my R101 right to request formal reconsideration of a
judicial determination that I should be punished, and appeal the
judgement of CFJ 1631, as ruling that I registered three days later
than my original attempt
I believe that I did not distribute proposals or publish a pool report
last week, and thus I am in contravention of the rules requiring me to
do so. I will try to get them distributed later today.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no problem with missing a proposal. Announcing that it's
inconsequential because you think the proposal is stupid isn't
something I think we expect from our Promotor, though.
Noted. I will be more civil in the
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:17 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 18:10 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, without objection from 2 members of Imperial and without
objection from 2 members of Team 4, to move Tiger to Team 4.
I object.
I note that it's in
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:44 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Erratification
Ratify the following incorrect document: { 1 + 1 = 3 }
The definition: When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is
minimally modified so that the ratified document was completely true
and accurate
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:35 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including
judges.
No I'm not.
Oh? I was
Conclusion: List-of-Succession-like things are a huge headache. Let's
go back to VLOPs.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote:
Also, I question whether violating a SHALL is a rule violation if
GUILTY is inappropriate.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?
I momentarily forgot the text of Mother, May
On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
Without two objections from members of my team, I intend to change its
name to Confederate.
—Confederator Tanner L. Swett
If possible, I do so.
--
Cantr, a browser-based RPG: http://www.cantr.net/ Create a Lojban
character
Note to self: I now have 21 Rests.
—Pariah Tanner L. Swett, still dangerously close to the edge
To create a Team Balancer means to create a new second-class
Player entitled Team Balancer followed by the smallest
positive integer that would cause the player to have a unique
name, which means there has never existed a player with that
name. Such a
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: P fix (AI=1.7, II=0, Distributable)
I'm interpreting this as meaning that you thereby make this proposal
Distributable.
—Promotor Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: This is missing about 6 proposals. Quite possibly every single
one proposed since I stopped record keeping.
It is indeed missing every single one proposed since you stopped
recordkeeping. I wasn't aware that there
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I was also thinking towards the end that it's a pretty good Prisoner's
Dilemma situation set up. Towards the end (when chance was pretty
near 50/50) there were a few people who could better their position by
one by
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Hawkishness (Rule 1871) of active players
-
Hovering: Tanner L. Swett
Taral
All other active players are hemming-and-hawing.
CoE: this is no longer defined.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No, PD is was exactly at one point. The logic: All of us non-rebels left
will move lower on the list if the rebellion wins. So we (collectively)
want the rebellion to fail, so we shouldn't rebel (that's cooperation).
I say if the report was published at time T, and it does not say it's
a report from time S, then it's a report from time T.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
The asset defined is not white ribbon; it is ribbon. Every ribbon
then has a color. A white ribbon is a ribbon whose color is white;
even
Note that class isn't actually defined by the rules. It could just
as easily be type, or even set. If the rules state that something
is a class of asset, that doesn't really tell us anything we didn't
already know.
Now, here's what the key thing to realize is, as I see it. An asset
only exists if
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
My argument is that this is governed by R2140(c). A Proposal is an
instrument of power, and if it attempts to create a token, it is
modifying a substantive aspect of the rule defining the Tokens (my
argument implies
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Does fungibility break this?
No, because capacitors are not a currency.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal White Renaissance (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
{{{
Amend Rule 2199 Ribbons by removing:
(except for White Ribbons, which can be awarded at any time
within a month after they are earned)
[So, no one
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
While this does result in White Ribbons not being needed for a
Renaissance win (as White is no longer mentioned in the rule), it does
not result
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that could be accomplished by making capacitors a bit more
accumulable. Are they tradeable, for example? I'd say up the price for
creating them out of ergs, and instead make it so that they don't
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Hm, I like the weekly destroying of ergs and capacitors, because I like
the way the current economy works, so I am against a manual destroying.
Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players to accumulate
power. How do you
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
When an officer becomes inactive, all of eir offices become Assumed.
Anyone can assume the office, and even immediately resign it if it
seems likely that things will get done by deputization more
efficiently when the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am, though I'm not sure of what I have to offer the FSCN.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
I would like to join, as I like team play.
Well, then, you're in. I hereby inceive the FSCN,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal Leet Leadership (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
{{{
Create a new Rule with power=1 entitled Leet Leadership:
When an interested proposal consisting of exact 1337 words
(excluding information like name, or
Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power to the elite, and
allowing players to accumulate
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Warrigal wrote:
I suggest adding a clause like this: If there is ambiguity about the
number of words in a proposal (for example, if there are hyphenated
words), it SHOULD be interpreted as containing exactly 1337 words, if
possible
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:52 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
AGAINST unless it's labour
Then it looks like my vote will effectively denounce yours.
—Disagreer Tanner L. Swett
Labour still means work, not worker. May I suggest Undergrad
or Intern?
—Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
The shuttle has completed two very short journeys in quick succession.
For each journey, every player who was active and not the enemy at the
start of it has earned one farad.
I award myself two capacitors for
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Grand Vizier: 3
Head Gardner: 3
Crown Prince: 1
Do you mean Head Gardener: 2?
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
Do you mean Head Gardener: 2?
No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
At least fix the spelling of gardener.
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2842
== Criminal Case 2842 (Interest Index = 2) ===
Murphy violated Power-1 Rule 2143 by failing to publish an ATC's
report in
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
existence, I think] called The Robot...
Warrigal's one where causality works backwards?
No, H. Sgeo's one
Perpepuum isn't a word, to my knowledge; perhaps you're after the
phrase perpetual motion machine. Labour means job or physical
task, so Lab Worker might work better there.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal Rights are important (AI=3.5, II=1, distributable via fee)
{{{
Increase the power of Rule 101 The Rights of Agorans to 3.5.
An AI of 3 is sufficient for this, as an instrument with a power of 3
is not restricted.
—Tanner L.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
-coppro
I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170
(power 3) by changing eir nickname to The Robot, a confusing
nickname.
—Accuser Tanner L. Swett
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
Proposal Different voting limits on democratic decisions? (AI=2, II=1,
distributable via fee)
{{{
Amend rule 2284 Fee-based actions by replacing
A player CAN increase eir voting limit on a specified decision to
adopt a proposal in
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this fails; you did not specify which Fragments you were using.
Submitting the proposal succeeded, but making it a D-Proposal failed.
—Lawyer Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Alex Smith
callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On an unrelated note, my primary computer's power supply shorted out and
caught fire a few days ago, meaning that I have only minimal use of it over
the next couple of weeks until a replacement can be shipped
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I opine AFFIRM without prejudice. The original judgement suggests a
precedent that even a disclaimered statement violates Truthiness if you
don't reasonably believe it could be true.
I opine AFFIRM without prejudice for
This has been hanging out in my drafts folder since the beginning of
this year. I've decided to finish it up and post it for the sake of
entertainment.
{This is a public contract known as Rent-a-Self. Membership in this
contract is restricted to players. Device number is a
party-to-this-contract
Waking up after a multi-month nap seems like a good idea to me. I
become active. I sit. I change my nickname to Tanner L. Swett.
—Tanner L. Swett, now one of the few Agorans who uses his real name
for Agora but a nickname for his From line
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:15 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed
Warrigal's registration.
I transfer a prop from coppro to Yally
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 18:52, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed
Warrigal's registration.
-coppro
I still do not see when this occurred
, the main issue is that the software is really terrible.
Yes, but once you have your own server, you can scrape it all you want.
--Warrigal
LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
LATIN SMALL LETTER O
LATIN SMALL LETTER W
2009/7/8 Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com:
LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
LATIN SMALL LETTER O
LATIN SMALL LETTER W
Please disregard this message. It is a typo.
--Warrigal
2009/7/1 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
As CotC, I intend (without 3 objections) to change this case's
Interest Index to 0.
You can't; only the Justiciar and the Justiciar can do that. Which is
silly enough that it might be false.
--Warrigal, who thinks that citing Agora's rules in APA
08:03:36 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.40 (Red Hat Linux)
Accept-Ranges: bytes
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.2.2
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-control: no-cache
Expires: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:03:42 -0700
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
--Warrigal
David slowed his pace slightly as his
if this were an attempt to flip
a contract's Disclosure to Public, it would not have succeeded.
--Tanner Warrigal Swett
2009/6/24 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2611
== CFJ 2611
, .deivyd.slod. probably would
have been a better Lojbanization.
--Warrigal
David slowed his pace slightly as his ears, protruding as they were,
kept snagging on the foliage.
isn't a bad 'ordinary language'
interpretation. (Don't like that it's not a noun? Please direct your
complaint to Ozymandias c/o Mr Shelley.)
I believe his name is Mu-Nan, and you'd be better of sending it c/o
NFN Llewellyn anyway.
Oh, wait, *that* Ozymandias.
--Warrigal
2009/6/16 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
2009/6/16 Taral tar...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott
Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No
consent was involved.
I'd say consent was
joined.
Nobody except me agreed to the old ə, and I un-agreed to it. From it.
--Warrigal
a different deck. Monthly draws are from
deck frequencies indicated by players' switches.
I imagine that Legislative and Academic could be merged into a single
Legislative deck; they're both about proposals. Renaming Bureaucratic
to Executive would make a lot of sense.
--Warrigal
2009/6/14 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Disagree, is binding.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be a sentence. Are you saying I
disagree; it's binding? 'Disagree' is binding? Something else which
would actually make sense to me in this context?
--Warrigal
and a pledge
known as ä, which terminates 24 hours from the time of its
publication. Anyone can act on my behalf to CFJ on the following
statement: Within the past 24 hours, Warrigal created a pledge known
as ä.}
--Warrigal
I change my nickname to Tanner Swett.
--Tom, who would like to go back to being called Warrigal
If I may...
Official Secrets Act (AI = 3, II = 2)
{Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled The Official Secrets Act with the
following text:
{The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is the agreement with the
following text: This is a public contract and a pledge known as the
Non-Disclosure Agreement.
2009/6/8 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
I submit the following three proposals:
{
Official Secrets Act
AI = 1, II = 2
Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled The Official Secrets Act with the
following text:
This is going to run afoul of Rule 101 unless you amend it. Also,
let's
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:35 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
A person CAN deposit an asset by transferring it to the IBA; e then
gains the Effective Rate in zorkmids.
The Effective Rate for a deposit is its Rate, multiplied by a value
depending on the number of previous deposits made in the
don't want to
include, such as arbitrary computer programs written by arbitrary
people.
--Warrigal--no, that's not right. Thomas O'Malley.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
--Thomas O'Malley (see, I remembered this time)
What is your official name anyway Warrigal?
I believe it's Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Luke Benner moronservi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am requesting to join Agora. The name I will be writing under will be
Randy Olshaw.
Lessee, by Rule 217, to join Agora is the same as to register, so
you're requesting registration, which, by Rule 869, makes you a
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal, entitled {Instant Adoption}, AI 3, II
1, coauthored by Goethe:
{{{
Create a new power-3 rule:
{{
A player may cause instant adoption of a proposal that has not
yet been voted on
I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
--Warrigal
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning. I
forgot two thirds of it.
I change my nickname to Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas
O'Malley, abbreviated
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Warrigal wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning
.
In what message was this called? I may want to appeal it if it sets
the precedent that it's possible to change whether a past message was
effective or not.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
1.)
Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
--Warrigal
} the correct word there? Or would {is} or
{eis} be better?)
eir.
Ah, thanks. I thought that was only used in the possessive.
If awaiting his return and posting [something] own win announcement
isn't the possessive, then what is it?
--Warrigal
in the decoded output seems to match the amount of
information in the encoded messages, indicating that there is no or
very little content which has not been revealed.
--Warrigal
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
We should so join this, right?
I imagine it would be similar if Agora and B simply joined each other,
or at least if B joined Agora. I believe that BlogNomic will not join.
--Warrigal
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe precedent is that flipping a certain Agoran switch (namely,
Citizenship) is not the same as an explicit, willful agreement to be
bound
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Schultz ke...@verizon.net wrote:
While we've found that SHALL - CAN, we haven't found that SHALL NOT -
CANNOT. In fact, accepting that SHALL NOT - CANNOT would probably
break a lot of things.
It seems to me (based on a dusty recollection of formal
Corporation's behalf with 1 Corporate Consent.}}
--Warrigal
they can own if they're not in it.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
The point?
It's yet another of my schemes to give Agora a fungible, liquid,
relatively stable currency.
--Warrigal
. The
former puts Y at the same power level as the rule that uses X; the
latter puts it at the same power level as itself.
--Warrigal
ihope...@gmail.com
I consent to being a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
--Warrigal
.
OR DOES IT?
--Warrigal
to the power 1.1. Enact the November
2002 ruleset at power 1.
--Warrigal
, what a strange typo.
--Warrigal
cream if
they eat strawberry ice cream instead.
--Warrigal
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Protect Our Rights (AI = 4)
Increase the power of Rule 101 (The Rights of Agorans) from power 3 to power
4.
-Yally
AI = 3 is sufficient, as power-3 instruments are unrestricted.
--Warrigal
of the game.
--Warrigal, who does not wish to be a player of It's A Trap Nomic
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Benjamin Schultz ke...@verizon.net wrote:
SAVAGE (Voting Limit: 0)
(All others not yet listed, as well as:)
Warrigal
Are you sure?
--Warrigal
intent of being deregistered.
I deregister by mistake.
I wonder how that one would be ruled?
GUILTY, I expect.
--Warrigal
.
As the existence of the contestmaster attribute does not depend on the
contract, dependent actions whose effects would include changing a
contest's contestmaster are not possible.
Gratuitous arguments: rule 2136 authorizes this to happen whether or
not 1728 does.
--Warrigal
that prohibitions on deregistration are ineffective by Rule 101.
--Warrigal
, changing
the membership of the set Rule 2211 doesn't affect any proposals,
other than to change whether or not they are rules. This only sounds
silly because we don't actually think of it that way.
--Warrigal
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
