On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 16:32 -0700, Lindar Greenwood wrote:
> > I'm not sure how we'd go about adding intent-of-rule post-scripts to
> > existing rules, especially since the point of some of them is to be
> > open to interpretation, but I think it would be
On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 16:32 -0700, Lindar Greenwood wrote:
> I'm not sure how we'd go about adding intent-of-rule post-scripts to
> existing rules, especially since the point of some of them is to be
> open to interpretation, but I think it would be delightful for new
> rules proposed to have an in
I have an actual, serious, real thing I'd like to submit, but I'm sure
I'd word it like a drooling idiot grasping a crayon in eir fist
doodling on construction paper and expecting the resulting abomination
to be adhered to the electric food-storage unit for all to admire.
The tune goes a little so
3 matches
Mail list logo
