On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 3:04 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Aris wrote:
>
> > Title: Ratification Rewrite
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors: Jason, G., Murphy
> [snip]
> > Amend Rule 1551, "Ratification", by changing it to read as follows:
> >
> >When a
Aris wrote:
Title: Ratification Rewrite
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: Jason, G., Murphy
[snip]
Amend Rule 1551, "Ratification", by changing it to read as follows:
When a statement is ratified, play proceeds as if the statement has
become true, and the state of the game
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 06:14:51PM -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> This reply is likely longer and more rambly than it needs to be. For
> that, I apologize in advance.
>
> > I'm tempted to bring out my "self-ratifying events" proto again. Were
> > there any particular
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:14 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> This reply is likely longer and more rambly than it needs to be. For
> that, I apologize in advance.
>
> > I'm tempted to bring out my "self-ratifying events" proto again. Were
> > there any particular objections you had?
> >
> > It wasn't
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 1:05 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Wasn't really planning to publish this so soon, as I'm not really done
> editing it. On the other hand, Murphy has published eirs, so I'm going
> for it.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Ratification Rewrite
> Adoption index:
This reply is likely longer and more rambly than it needs to be. For
that, I apologize in advance.
> I'm tempted to bring out my "self-ratifying events" proto again. Were
> there any particular objections you had?
>
> It wasn't complete, but it is possible to implement in stages.
>
> Its benefit
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 01:04:33PM -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Wasn't really planning to publish this so soon, as I'm not really done
> editing it. On the other hand, Murphy has published eirs, so I'm going
> for it.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Ratification Rewrite
> Adoption
Wasn't really planning to publish this so soon, as I'm not really done
editing it. On the other hand, Murphy has published eirs, so I'm going
for it.
-Aris
---
Title: Ratification Rewrite
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: Jason, G.
[Let's face it, the ratification rules are a mess.
On 8/4/2019 10:24 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 8/4/19 1:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> In R1551:
>>the gamestate is modified to what it would be if,
>> at the time the ratified document was published ...
>>
>> (later it says "if" the document has a different time
On 8/4/19 1:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
In R1551:
the gamestate is modified to what it would be if,
at the time the ratified document was published ...
(later it says "if" the document has a different time then the
publication
date, use that instead. otherwise, the
On 8/4/2019 10:17 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
So, if I'm correct, this may be a fairly serious bug, but only if people do
what I did and don't put the date in their self-ratifying reports.
I think that if a report fails to state when it is true, then when it is
self-ratified, it becomes true at
On 8/4/19 1:17 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
So, if I'm correct, this may be a fairly serious bug, but only if
people do what I did and don't put the date in their self-ratifying
reports.
I think that if a report fails to state when it is true, then when it
is self-ratified, it becomes true at the
So, if I'm correct, this may be a fairly serious bug, but only if people
do what I did and don't put the date in their self-ratifying reports.
I think that if a report fails to state when it is true, then when it is
self-ratified, it becomes true at the time that it is ratified, rather
than
13 matches
Mail list logo
