I have no ill against you barring me, just that I wasn't familiar with the
procedure.
天火狐
On 27 April 2017 at 22:04, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> That’s pretty much it. You’re best-placed to actually provide insight into
> the truthiness of the statement, which is why I barred you: I’m actually
> try
That’s pretty much it. You’re best-placed to actually provide insight into the
truthiness of the statement, which is why I barred you: I’m actually trying to
figure out how Agora as a whole interprets the 蘭亭社 charter. Having you step in
and answer directly somewhat defeats the purpose.
-o
> On
This sounds like an issue where I sit on the sideline and eat popcorn and
maybe attempt to correct if everyone is horribly off-mark. Wonderful.
On 27 April 2017 at 02:46, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 02:43 -0400, Josh T wrote:
> > I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 02:43 -0400, Josh T wrote:
> I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek clarification
> on the issue.
When you call a CFJ, you can choose one player who will not be able to
judge that CFJ; that's called "barring a player". Normally you do that
if the CFJ is about th
I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek clarification on the
issue.
天火狐
On 27 April 2017 at 00:27, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I CFJ, barring 天火狐, on the statement
>
> 蘭亭社's highest allowable budget for a single player is 50.
>
> I present no arguments, largely out of spite.
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
