Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-27 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > > I too would love to see your logic. My reasoning for using the honorific >> "Right" as a noun instead of as an adjective rests on an understanding of >> ancient, non-alphabetic languages. >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread omd
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I don't know how mailing lists work. Is a "separate" message sent from > the list to each individual recipient? If so, is there any chance the > stamps on each individual copy of the same message would vary? > (obviously this might fall under

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Benjamin Schultz wrote: I too would love to see your logic. My reasoning for using the honorific "Right" as a noun instead of as an adjective rests on an understanding of ancient, non-alphabetic languages. I think you mean "as an adjective instead of as an adverb". Greet

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Benjamin Schultz
I too would love to see your logic. My reasoning for using the honorific "Right" as a noun instead of as an adjective rests on an understanding of ancient, non-alphabetic languages. OscarMeyr On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Love to see your logic! When I last had

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread ATMunn
Wow, excellent job. I'm not going to even attempt to read it all, because my mind will probably explode. (I sometimes have a hard time fully understanding smaller CFJ judgements...) On 6/25/2018 9:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! The court delivers below a verdic

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 06:34 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I don't know how mailing lists work. Is a "separate" message sent > from the list to each individual recipient? If two recipients have different mailservers, the mailing list will have to forward the email to each mailserver individually. It'

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Aris Merchant
No, they should be The Flighty. -Aris On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 12:47 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I considered giving "The Elusive" to fugitives, but given that being a > fugitive is not necessarily positive, I wasn't sure that it would fit > wi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I considered giving "The Elusive" to fugitives, but given that being a fugitive is not necessarily positive, I wasn't sure that it would fit with the other titles. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > We should actually make Quazie "The Elusive". > > -Aris > > > On Tue, Jun 26

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Aris Merchant
We should actually make Quazie "The Elusive". -Aris On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 12:25 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll write it up before the birthday, but unfortunately, my logic does > not encompass every patent title or only patent titles, so

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I'll write it up before the birthday, but unfortunately, my logic does not encompass every patent title or only patent titles, so it may not fully resolve the organization of the scroll. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Love to see your logic! When I last had the job I k

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
Love to see your logic! When I last had the job I kept meaning to rearrange the Herald's Scroll to be by-person, e.g. OscarMeyr the Thrice-Victorious, Conspirator of Fantasies, Spinner of Scams, 12th Degree Bureaucrat, O.L. On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Under my

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Under my logic, you are only entitled to be called The Victorious OscarMeyr. I put together my logic on a whim to try to give more usage to patent titles, but if people wanted to know it, I could write it up and share it. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:40 Benjamin Schultz wrote: > Should I ever re-re

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Benjamin Schultz
Should I ever re-register, I am tempted to insist on being addressed as "the Right and Victorious OscarMeyr".

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
A separate message is sent to each subscriber, therefore variation could occur. However, given the small size of this mailing list, any such variation should be insignificant and from my understanding, regular. By regular, I mean that if my time stamp is 2 seconds after yours on one message, then o

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3642 judged FALSE

2018-06-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! The court delivers below a verdict on CFJ 3642, > called by The Victorious and Honourable Aris. Utterly brilliant overall. Thank you. Technical question, you write: > 478 states, "Any action performed by sending a