Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-12 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > I do think we need to tighten up what it means to pay, and to > spend, Shinies. How’s this for a sketch: > > * Where the rules define an amount of an asset to be paid to a > recipient, any attempt to pay an amount other than the full > amount due

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Well, I did about the same as Herald when I re-posted the victory election > thing. Traditionally, the proof of a scammer's good intent is an actual > proposal to fix the problem. I think an apology is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread ATMunn
ah, sorry. On 11/9/2017 10:09 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: That's what I was suggesting that o take the opportunity to do... On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: If more people would give me suggestions on what to change in my auctions proposal, then I could get it out a lot sooner. :P On 11/9/2017

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
That's what I was suggesting that o take the opportunity to do... On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: > If more people would give me suggestions on what to change in my auctions > proposal, then I could get it out a lot sooner. :P > > On 11/9/2017 9:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > Well,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread ATMunn
If more people would give me suggestions on what to change in my auctions proposal, then I could get it out a lot sooner. :P On 11/9/2017 9:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Well, I did about the same as Herald when I re-posted the victory election thing. Traditionally, the proof of a scammer's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
Well, I did about the same as Herald when I re-posted the victory election thing. Traditionally, the proof of a scammer's good intent is an actual proposal to fix the problem. I think an apology is appropriate, where the apology included a fix. I'm not sure if the fix is stopping all these

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread VJ Rada
Alright, G. I'm giving you the opportunity to decide this case. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > Routine finger point to o for collaborating yadda yadda give him green > card, ty, lol. > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Owen Jacobson

DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > As authorized by the contract "Easy Off Scam: Cleaning Your Mold Fast", I > cause the Head, V.J Rada, to pay Agora 1 shiny towards the purchase of the > Estate of Erewhon. […] I’m generally pretty reticent to abuse

DIS: Re: BUS: Can we telegraph this any more clearly?

2017-11-09 Thread Aris Merchant
I favor this case. -Aris On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:53 AM Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Nov 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > > As authorized by the contract "Easy Off Scam: Cleaning Your Mold Fast", > I cause the Head, V.J Rada, to pay Agora 1