On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 03:09, Reuben Staley via agora-business
wrote:
> Due to current world events, I have returned back home and will be
> staying for the forseeable future. I appear to still be registered;
> therefore, I flip my master switch to myself.
>
> --
> Trigon
Welcome back!
- Falsifia
Welcome!
This appears to be very similar to the Reportor (r. 2446), and this proposal
would be improved by making it clear how the office of Digestive System differs
from that office.
-o
> On May 21, 2017, at 12:17 AM, James Beirne wrote:
>
> I'd like to register as a player for about the fi
This could also be solved by having a more active Reportor.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I like this idea.
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
> On Sun, May 21,
I like this idea.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 12:17 AM, James Beirne
wrote:
> I'd like to register as a player for about the fifth time.
>
> I'd also like to submit a proposal entitled "Reader's Digest": {
>
> Enact a new rule entitled "Reader's Digest": {
>
>
>
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I guess i would add that information into the Reportor's job? Seems like
> too similar of a role to the reportor.
>
I agree. The idea is certainly interesting though. Might I suggest
retracting the proposal and revising it?
-Aris
I guess i would add that information into the Reportor's job? Seems like
too similar of a role to the reportor.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:34 PM James Beirne
wrote:
> Er, well it would hopefully be more of a summary than a reportage.
>
> The point being, someone like me who's been gone for god k
Er, well it would hopefully be more of a summary than a reportage.
The point being, someone like me who's been gone for god knows how long
could read the last couple of digests and have a fair idea of what's going
on.
On 21 May 2017 at 00:22, Quazie wrote:
> And this differs from rule 2446 how?
And this differs from rule 2446 how?
Rule 2446/3 (Power=1)
The Agoran Newspaper
The Reportor is an office.
The Reportor's weekly report includes:
a) A suitable name for a newspaper, at the Reportor's
discretion.
b) A description of events that have hap
On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 16:25 +, Quazie wrote:
> Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This is
> just an introduction to a CuddleBeam.
Right, it's not even reasonably unambiguously an intent to register.
For example, if Bucky turned up and said hi, I wouldn't assume that
Buc
On Sat, 20 May 2017, Quazie wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:04 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I was about to say: 'X is [not] a Player' is 100% certain the most
> common CFJ.
>
> On a quick count, I get 88 of those in the database. (Though a good
> percentage of those ab
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:04 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I was about to say: 'X is [not] a Player' is 100% certain the most common
> CFJ.
>
> On a quick count, I get 88 of those in the database. (Though a good
> percentage of those about contracts, deregistrations, and such, I don't
> know how
I was about to say: 'X is [not] a Player' is 100% certain the most common CFJ.
On a quick count, I get 88 of those in the database. (Though a good
percentage of those about contracts, deregistrations, and such, I don't
know how many are purely about registration messages - but quite a few).
F
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM Nic Evans wrote:
> On 05/20/2017 11:37 AM, caleb vines wrote:
>
> I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
> reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is "some
> argument," this post does not meet that bar. There
On 05/20/2017 11:37 AM, caleb vines wrote:
I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is
"some argument," this post does not meet that bar. There is a non-zero
amount of reasonably ambiguous language an
Grok - Many registration attempts are questioned - i'd say it's likely the
most common class of CFJ.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:37 AM caleb vines wrote:
> I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
> reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is "
I'm fairly certain that if the bar is that intent must be "[clear] and
reasonably [unambiguous]" and the best that can be said in favor is "some
argument," this post does not meet that bar. There is a non-zero amount of
reasonably ambiguous language and intent which makes me believe this would
not
On Sat, 20 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
> Hello I am Cuddlebeam!
> I hope this message goes through lol.
Ok, I *definitely* predict CFJ with this one...
And,
Hi Cuddlebeam!
There's some argument to be made that sending a message to BUS suggest e
intended to do an action, and the most reasonable action is registration...
On 05/20/2017 11:25 AM, Quazie wrote:
Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This is
just an introduction to a CuddleBeam.
Okay - So this one certainly isn't a registration, right? This is just an
introduction to a CuddleBeam.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:12 AM CuddleBeam
wrote:
> Hello I am Cuddlebeam!
>
> I hope this message goes through lol.
>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Noé Rubinstein wrote:
> The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I
> would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go.
>
> Also, the usual CFJ.
I announce a transfer of a unit of the usual non-existent praise-expressing
curren
On 25 June 2012 21:24, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Arguments: In context, I consider "here I go" a reasonably unambiguous
> equivalent of "I become a player".
Arguments: In my opinion, this is really stretching our leniency with
registration requests to breaking point, especially since its author
was cle
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Context for the newcomers:
>
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1260
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1261
I would normally have complained about explaining jokes being unfunny,
but even though I was aware of
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> These days, "AGAINT" is treated the same as any other Rule 754 (1) typo
> (see Judge Zefram's arguments in CFJ 1885). I thought we'd decided
> otherwise, but apparently I remembered wrong (or at least it's only
> ambiguous if the poster says "ha
Pavitra wrote:
On 06/25/2012 02:24 PM, Noé Rubinstein wrote:
The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I
would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go.
Also, the usual CFJ.
AGAINT
Context for the newcomers:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Arguments: In context, I consider "here I go" a reasonably unambiguous
> equivalent of "I become a player".
Gratuitous: I intended "here I go" to reference the act of posting a
message, not the act of registering.
--
Noé Rubinstein
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:19 PM, ais523 wrote:
> Arguments: The "usual CFJ", despite being established in game custom,
> doesn't have a standard phrasing, although there are some common ones.
> ("I am a player" or "Phlogistique is a player" are two plausible
> wordings.) I'd say that the meaning
On 06/25/2012 02:24 PM, Noé Rubinstein wrote:
> The game is slow enough nowadays for me not to mind giving it a go; I
> would hate for my first time to be unambiguous, though, so here I go.
>
> Also, the usual CFJ.
AGAINT
I wrote:
> omd wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> omd wrote:
>>>
Guess what I intend to do at this time?
>>>
>>> Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: Â omd is a player.
>>
>> CFJ: If I registered in the quoted message, I would currently be District.
>>
>> Argumen
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Gratuitous: Rule 2226 defines judicial rank as a player switch. Rule
> >> 2162 says "No other entity possesses an instance of that switch". If
> >> you deregistered, then you became
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Gratuitous: Rule 2226 defines judicial rank as a player switch. Rule
>> 2162 says "No other entity possesses an instance of that switch". If
>> you deregistered, then you became an "other entity" and thus ceased to
>> possess
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Gratuitous: Rule 2226 defines judicial rank as a player switch. Rule
> 2162 says "No other entity possesses an instance of that switch". If
> you deregistered, then you became an "other entity" and thus ceased to
> possess an instance of the ju
omd wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> omd wrote:
>>
>>> Guess what I intend to do at this time?
>>
>> Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: Â omd is a player.
>
> CFJ: If I registered in the quoted message, I would currently be District.
>
> Arguments: District is the de
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 18:55, Jonathan Rouillard <
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: omd is a player.
>
> But... If omd is a player... He can be assigned... If he's not... He
> can't... Why bar him? =P
>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: omd is a player.
But... If omd is a player... He can be assigned... If he's not... He
can't... Why bar him? =P
Oh. Wait. He might become a player before CFJs are assigned... Got it. (^_^)
~ Roujo
P.S: Sorry f
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:15 PM, omd wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM, omd wrote:
>>> Guess what I intend to do at this time?
>>
>> Incidentally, I was planning to have a script send this message at
>> 00:00:00, but failed due to a t
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 21:46, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:15 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM, omd wrote:
> >> Guess what I intend to do at this time?
> >
> > Incidentally, I was planning to have a script send this message at
> > 00:00:00, but failed due to
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:15 PM, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM, omd wrote:
>> Guess what I intend to do at this time?
>
> Incidentally, I was planning to have a script send this message at
> 00:00:00, but failed due to a typo.
The Pariah-Registrar's assertions to the contrary, you d
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, omd wrote:
> Guess what I intend to do at this time?
Ask us to guess what you intend to do at this time?
2009/5/28 Benjamin Caplan :
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Benjamin Caplan
>> wrote:
>>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
e^(-kt).
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I change my name to Confusion Arises from Suff
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Benjamin Caplan
> wrote:
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
>>> e^(-kt).
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
>> Nickname Pe
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
>> e^(-kt).
>
> ...
>
> I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
> Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nic
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> If you seriously want me to address you by that name (likewise, if
> Warrigal and ehird seriously wish to be addressed by Tom and Arnold,
> respectively), then I will, though I will likely have to abbreviate the
> longer names.
I'll continue to abbreviate m
My official name is You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward, and was ehird
before that.
On 2009-05-25, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I CFJ on: "The nickname 'Goethe' unambiguously identifies the player
>>> who generally sends messages to the li
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I CFJ on: "The nickname 'Goethe' unambiguously identifies the player
>> who generally sends messages to the list from the address
>> 'ke...@u.washington.edu'."
>
> Sure it does. So does "Kerim" or "G." or maybe "G" at the moment.
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I CFJ on: "The nickname 'Goethe' unambiguously identifies the player
> who generally sends messages to the list from the address
> 'ke...@u.washington.edu'."
Sure it does. So does "Kerim" or "G." or maybe "G" at the moment.
Using a nick (or in this c
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> Also, I nominate coppro as Herald.
>
> You need support for this.
I was under the impression an election had already been initiated.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 23 May 2009, Taral wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >>> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard
> Duck
2009/5/24 Geoffrey Spear :
> I think I'd need 2 support for an R2170 NoV, so I'll wait.
>
> Also, I nominate coppro as Herald.
You've really mastered your niche, haven't you.
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:09 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> I will be continuing to use Goethe.
>>>
>>> Further to this, I will be reverting to using Warrigal and ehird as
>>> well. Feel free to CFJ me on it.
>>
>> No,
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/5/24 Kerim Aydin :
>> No, but for your lack of respect, if you do so:
>>
>> 1. I will never vote for you in an election;
>> 2. As an officer, I will use the nickname for you of "disrespectful
>> idiot". It will be unique so it will clearly identif
2009/5/24 Kerim Aydin :
> No, but for your lack of respect, if you do so:
>
> 1. I will never vote for you in an election;
> 2. As an officer, I will use the nickname for you of "disrespectful
> idiot". It will be unique so it will clearly identify you in my
> reports.
>
> Up to you! :P -G.
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:09 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I will be continuing to use Goethe.
> >
> > Further to this, I will be reverting to using Warrigal and ehird as
> > well. Feel free to CFJ me on it.
>
> No, but for your lack of respect, if you do so:
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I will be continuing to use Goethe.
>
> Further to this, I will be reverting to using Warrigal and ehird as
> well. Feel free to CFJ me on it.
No, but for your lack of respect, if you do so:
1. I will never vote for you in an election;
2. As an officer, I
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2009, Taral wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
>>> e^(-kt).
>> Or Goethe, for short.
>
> No. That's someone else.
>
> Recordkeepors, if shortening this i
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I change my nickname to You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward.
Three Worlds Collide?
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
> e^(-kt).
Or Goethe, for short.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
>> e^(-kt).
>
> ...
>
> I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
> Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transpa
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I change my nickname to Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck
> e^(-kt).
...
I change my name to Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused
Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transparency
(CASEINPOINT).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
>
>> 2008/7/15 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I support.
>>>
>>> --Ivan Hope CXXV
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:11 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
I support.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
2008/7/15 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
Hi!
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 21:01 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Indeed. Without 3 objections, I intend to cause the Reformed Bank of
> > Agora to destroy the currencies described above from its possession,
> > in the quantities described
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I object as well, there is no harm in the Bank owning extra assets, it
>> only increases the value of the bank without terribly unbalancing the
>> AAA. Ho
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object as well, there is no harm in the Bank owning extra assets, it
> only increases the value of the bank without terribly unbalancing the
> AAA. However, if there is sufficient outcry from AAA members over this
> I will
BobTHJ wrote:
> If the notary were to attempt to terminate the equation of CFJ 1927 I
> would not object.
Without objection, I intend to terminate the equation of CFJ 1927.
--
Notary ais523, who can take a hint
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would suggest taking this opportunity to terminate the equation of CFJ
>> 1915.
>>
>
> With the majority consent of the Vote Market parties I int
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:45 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> My VP is now 50 or above.
>>>
>>> I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points.
>>
>> You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gav
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> My VP is now 50 or above.
>>
>> I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points.
>
> You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gave them to you
> because he thought you desperately wanted to be out of the V
2008/6/28 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My VP is now 50 or above.
>
> I give Pavrita 20 Vote Points.
You know, ais523 stole VP from me and gave them to you
because he thought you desperately wanted to be out of the Vote Market.
69 matches
Mail list logo
