Fail
On 2009-06-07, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
{
Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
to the end of the bulleted list reading:
(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 10:15 -0700, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
{
Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
to the end of the bulleted list reading:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals who attempted to
emulate First Speaker Michael Norrish by registering as soon as
possible after hearing about Agora.
Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A Lurker.
I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
Who has the longest lurk time? I have
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I think the patent title deserves a better name. Something creative.
Instant Gratification?
Leapt Before Lookt?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
Lurker. I'll resubmit when I
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Fails; no such proposal was ever in the Pool.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Fails; no such proposal was ever in the Pool.
He meant Very little or no lurk time
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.com
wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I do I signed up, immediately registered, and jumped right in.
11 matches
Mail list logo