DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the Stuffs: April 1st-7th edition

How would people feel about a rule that either: 1) Automatically takes newly created contents from a facility that a player owns or is contractually allowed to take from and is located on they same land that e is located at? 2) Players can designate some text as a command that they automatically

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

Aris was at (-1, -1) CB was at (+1, -1) I'm sorry I didn't publish reports. I probably should have. I knew people would get mad eventually because of my tardiness. But I figured more people would also get mad if I published anything in a report. Everyone would only get mad at everyone else

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

I was still at (-1, -1). -Aris On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:54 PM Gaelan Steele wrote: > Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to > update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a > long time. > > Gaelan > > > On Mar 19,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a long time. Gaelan > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I take everything from where I'm standing. > > On

DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs

Preserved public facilities are supposed to help new and impoverished players get some starting resources even if they don't have their own facilities. Also to give all players an additional easy source of income. Unpreserved public facilites are basically no man's land where this kind of stuff is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs

I'd be willing to just contract it to a redistribution contract or just transfer it to people or something. I agree it's pretty unfair. What was the goal of the public facilities? Maybe we need to redo them to better achieve that goal On Mar 4, 2018 6:03 PM, "Aris Merchant"

DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs

Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm worried about the long term