DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2021-03-20 Thread Collin Tir via agora-discussion
I'm not really sure why I even tried to do this in the first place <.< On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:06 PM Falsifian via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 09:03:17PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business > wrote: > > On 3/20/21 9:02 PM, Collin Tir via ag

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-19 Thread Gaelan Steele
I assume those links are copypasted from the links in the ruleset itself. If you wanted permalinks, you could link directly to the YAML files in the repo. I don't know of a good way to do versioning of GH pages; I'd need something to talk with GH's API and pull down the correct version of the ru

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-19 Thread Owen Jacobson
It’d be nice if those links included an effective date or some other revision identifier, to make them stable against future rule changes. Maybe I’ll hack something up. Since it appears that P.S.S. has broken at least one rule regardless of eir beliefs about eir job, and for lack of a better na

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
CoE accepted. I submit the below as a revised version: Registrar's Weekly Report (all times UTC) Date of last report: 18 Apr 20

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
No, but I also did not know that I had hit send as it was in a half-drafted state and I didn't intend to send it until tomorrow. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Pub

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Aris Merchant
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I believe that no punishment should be received by me because it was a > report and I did it via deputisation, which I am allowed to do. Further, I > accepted all CoEs and handled them, therefore I see no rules violations >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Aris Merchant
Mostly I just want to test out the Finger Pointing system. It wasn't a very serious violation even if it was one, but I'd like to see the Referee's report on this. -Aris On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Okay, then the report should count and I believe sin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Okay, then the report should count and I believe since I accepted the CoE, it doesn't matter anyway. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > Actually nothing in the current deputisation rules say you need to not > be the officeholder. AFAICT, the

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Aris Merchant
As per nichdel's arguments, I Point my Finger at Publius Scribonius Scholasticus (Rule 2478). I accuse em of violations of Rule 2143 and/or Rule 2471, as well as any other rule rule violations e may have committed in publishing eir purported report by deputization. I recommend a light sentence, pro

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I am not sure though that there is sufficient evidence that it was a report > given that > the means to do so are either as an officer or by deputisation and I claimed > to do it > on way and did not suggest the other. > I also di

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Nic Evans
Actually nothing in the current deputisation rules say you need to not be the officeholder. AFAICT, the office holder can deputise for eir own office, as long as all other conditions are met. On 05/18/17 15:16, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Gratuitous: This is

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I am not sure though that there is sufficient evidence that it was a report given that the means to do so are either as an officer or by deputisation and I claimed to do it on way and did not suggest the other. I also did not title the report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, May 18,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Gratuitous: This is another example of the I Say I Did, Therefore I Did > (ISIDTHID) > Fallacy that has Plagued Agora for a Long Time. This is worth explaining for new players. Saying "I hereby do X" does not automatically mean that you

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
But, I did not realise my action was IMPOSSIBLE because I did not realise I was performing it. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > If you don't believe it was fulfilling a duty, then you purported to > deputise when it was impossible, which i

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
Gratuitous: This is another example of the I Say I Did, Therefore I Did (ISIDTHID) Fallacy that has Plagued Agora for a Long Time. On Thu, 18 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > CFJ : This report was not actually an officer's report as I published it via > deputi

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: (no subject)

2017-05-18 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Given that I believe this was not a report, there is no way to CoE it. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > CoE: There is no player named "天砫ç‹Â" > > On 05/18/17 14:51, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > I hereby deputise