On 10/19/14 16:38, Eritivus wrote:
D'oh.
If I am a Player, I _DO NOT_ initiate the following CFJ:
I recommend against issuing CFJs conditionally.
CFJ: Ratification of the Registrar's 11 Oct report failed.
Arguments:
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 16:45 +, woggle wrote:
This information is not self-ratifying. The list of players registered is as a
result of R2162(c).
Ah, I see. I mistakenly thought that all information required to be in
reports is self-ratifying.
Oh well, see you next month :).
On 10/19/14 16:56, Eritivus wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 16:45 +, woggle wrote:
This information is not self-ratifying. The list of players registered is as
a
result of R2162(c).
Ah, I see. I mistakenly thought that all information required to be in
reports is self-ratifying.
Oh
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Eritivus wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 16:45 +, woggle wrote:
This information is not self-ratifying. The list of players registered is
as a
result of R2162(c).
Ah, I see. I mistakenly thought that all information required to be in
reports is self-ratifying.
On 1 September 2012 11:11, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 Aug 2012, at 13:15, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:13 PM, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Walker 30 Jan 12 *
Also, for each of players named above, I intend,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:53 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:12 AM, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
RUBLES
PERSONRUBLES OWNED
##
CoE: Does not list BobTHJ.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:54 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com
FKA441344 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:53 AM, omdc.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:12 AM, FKA44131...@gmail.com wrote:
RUBLES
PERSONRUBLES OWNED
##
CoE: Does not list BobTHJ.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:54 AM,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 08:41, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
INACTIVE PLAYERS (2)
Nickname Since
--
scshunt 10 Jan 12
Sgeo 24 Oct 11 *
CoE: On 30 Jan, I
On 6 August 2011 16:49, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 06:59, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Registrar's Census
Date of last report: Tue 26 Jul 2011
Date of this report: Fri 05 Aug 2011
[snip]
SECOND-CLASS PLAYERS (2)
Player
On 8/7/11 9:12 AM, Charles Walker wrote:
On 6 August 2011 16:49, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 06:59, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Registrar's Census
Date of last report: Tue 26 Jul 2011
Date of this report: Fri 05 Aug 2011
[snip]
On 28 April 2011 22:08, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Tanner L. Swett ihope...@gmail.com 21 Sep 09
CoE: I cannot be reached at that email address.
Corrected in draft.
--
Charles
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Florw flo...@gmail.com 13 Apr 11
There is a CFJ on Florw's playership as well. This needs a Q after it.
It really
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 April 2011 22:31, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Registrar's Census
FIRST-CLASS PLAYERS (15)
CoE: omd/comex/c. is not listed
On 5 April 2011 18:32, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
NoV: Yally violated Rule 1504 (a Power 2 Rule) by becoming active
during eir timeout period.
Gratuitous argument: The suspension, even if it didn't make
em active, suspended the SHALL
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Wooble wrote:
CoE:
Date of this report: Sat 19 Mar 2011
Was published on 20 Mar.
Not in eir time zone.
R1023.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 13:24 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Date of this report: Mon 08 Jan 11
I publish an NoV alleging that Yally violated the power 1 Rule 2215 by
publicly stating that e published the message
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:11 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, that makes more sense. However, I disagree with you: the current
judge of CFJ 2908 is part of the gamestate; it can be ratified to be
you irrespective of whether Murphy actually succeeded in assigning it
to you when e purported
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I contest this. My opinion on CFJ 2908 strongly implies that I don't
believe I was a player at the time it was purportedly assigned to me.
This assignment was purportedly made after I deregistered and before
the
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
even publish. It's clearly mpossible for both of these things to be
true. Therefore, e MUST have known that at least one of these NoVs
contained incorrect information.
Nonsense, failing to know that does NOT violate
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 17:20, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
even publish. It's clearly mpossible for both of these things to be
true. Therefore, e MUST have known that at least one of these NoVs
contained incorrect
On 30 November 2010 23:16, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I publish an NoV, alleging that Wooble violated Rule 2215, a power-1
rule, by publishing a list of current players and their previous dates
of
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:50 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
while(1)
fork();
We generally don't accept synonyms for infinite numbers of actions here
at Agora.
--
ais523
scshunt wrote:
On 10-11-15 01:28 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Hmm. There's almost no point in initiating a criminal CFJ, because
clearly Wooble is innocent on account of not being reasonably aware.
Thus, I CFJ on the following sentence. The Registrar's most recent
report should have included
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Gratuitous: Failure to consider a non-obvious potential interpretation
of a rule before someone else points it out does not constitute failure
to know that rule, and thus does constitute a reasonable defense.
But it
On 18 November 2010 00:17, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Hmm, it's, you know, pseudocode. I mean, I usually do that in roughing
out before deciding final data structures.
But you're right. It should have been:
#define DISFAVORED 4
*(CFJlist + N)-Jstatus[Plookup(G.)] =
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 21:47, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 18 November 2010 00:17, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Hmm, it's, you know, pseudocode. I mean, I usually do that in roughing
out before deciding final data structures.
But you're right.
On 16 November 2010 00:13, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
ThisCFJ-G-disfavor = TRUE.
I am so glad we do not program in the kind of fake code people make up
to converse in.
It would be an... interesting whirlwind of semantics^W^W^Wexperience.
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 16 November 2010 00:13, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
ThisCFJ-G-disfavor = TRUE.
I am so glad we do not program in the kind of fake code people make up
to converse in.
It would be an... interesting whirlwind of
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I CFJ {If the Registrar's report should, by the rules, have included that
Tiger became Inactive on 2 May, 2010, then Wooble would be able to resort to
the defense of reasonable error in a criminal CFJ over that rules
On 10-11-15 08:55 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I CFJ {If the Registrar's report should, by the rules, have included that
Tiger became Inactive on 2 May, 2010, then Wooble would be able to resort to
the defense of
coppro wrote:
On 08/09/2010 12:03 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
G. ke...@u.washington.edu 29 Oct 09 S
I intend, without objection, to flip activity to inactive.
Yours? G.'s? Wooble's?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:07, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 08:52 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Registrar's Census
FIRST-CLASS PLAYERS (19)
Nickname E-mail
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
This NoV is invalid; by rule 2230(c) an NoV must specify one action or
inaction which is illegal, and that was not clearly present in this NoV
(there were two alleged actions).
The action was the publication of the report.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 16:35, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/21/2010 03:28 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Recent events
-
Mon 01 Mar 03:07 Andon registers
Wed 03 Mar 23:19 BobTHJ comes off hold
Fri 05 Mar 07:44 woggle registers
Fri 05 Mar 15:06 c. changes eir nickname to
Taral wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if
one has voted in the previous week.
Not any more; their latest
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if
one has voted in the
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I submit the following proposal (Title=Active Players Must Do Something
Useful, II 1, AI 1.7):
Cron job to be the first to burn off your rest ftw!
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to be higher than necessary.
I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
I object.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to be
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only active in a sense if
one has voted in the previous week.
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if
Why?
On 2009-05-16, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's
Oh god call me when it's over
On 2009-05-16, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Siege wrote:
Taral wrote:
Siege wrote:
coppro wrote:
I intend, without objection, to put Siege on hold.
I object.
It's been two weeks. Still hasn't done anything except cause the
quorum to
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules.
No, too dangerous the other way. Better way is to penalize
for repeated non-votes (e.g. current proposal to make non-voters
inactive). Better would be rests for active players who don't
vote
Ok, ok. I'll look to having a bayes 2 up in a couple of days.
On 2009-05-01, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
sgeo--sgeos...@gmail.com mailto:sgeos...@gmail.com--27 Jun 08--Y
siege--thesi...@gmail.com mailto:thesi...@gmail.com--26 Nov 08--Y
Normish Partnership
2009/4/26 comex com...@gmail.com:
Your name is Elliot Hird
No it's not, it's Elliott Hird.
2009/4/26 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Elliott Hird wrote:
CoE: My name was ehird. Now it's Arnold Bros (est. 1905).
ehird is still sufficient to identify you unambiguously. There is no
reason why the Registrar or any other officer or player should be forced
to refer to you (or to Warrigal)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/4/26 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Elliott Hird wrote:
CoE: My name was ehird. Now it's Arnold Bros (est. 1905).
ehird is still sufficient to identify you unambiguously. There is no
reason why the
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I was listed as Arnold Bros, and it said that ehrid changed eir
name to that. If you're going to list my new name, it would make sense
that it would be properly written; and ehrid is unambiguously an
error.
That's
Yally wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
mailto:penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I was listed as Arnold Bros, and it said that ehrid changed eir
name to that. If you're going to list my new name, it would make sense
that it
Elliott Hird wrote:
CoE: My name was ehird. Now it's Arnold Bros (est. 1905).
ehird is still sufficient to identify you unambiguously. There is no
reason why the Registrar or any other officer or player should be forced
to refer to you (or to Warrigal) by another name.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
CoE: My name was ehird. Now it's Arnold Bros (est. 1905).
Your name is Elliot Hird; ehird is a nickname for you, and Arnold Bros
(est. 1905) may also be-- see CFJ 1361. This might have made a grand
difference
2009/4/7 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
The logs are not permanent (we lost several years worth when escribe.com
died).
OTOH, hopefully that will never happen again.
(I'm an archivist packrat)
Yally wrote:
1. Much of the history section is inconsistent and incomplete.
2. Publishing the history section is not required by the rules or any
CFJs to my knowledge.
3. The Registrar's report was, in my opinion, unnecessarily long. The
history dominated the report. And Agora is only
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Fri, 13 Feb 03:12:15 Wooble deregisters
CoE: WHAT?
I intend, without objection, to ratify that report.
2009/2/16 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Fri, 13 Feb 03:12:15 Wooble deregisters
CoE: WHAT?
That is an _excellent_ scam.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/2/16 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Fri, 13 Feb 03:12:15 Wooble deregisters
CoE: WHAT?
That is an _excellent_ scam.
I don't
Taral wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Fri, 13 Feb 03:12:15 Wooble deregisters
CoE: WHAT?
Denied. I interpret cease to play as deregister. R101 permits you
to cease to
57 matches
Mail list logo
