Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 4958 - 4969

2007-05-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: 4965 | The Standing Court | Murphy| 1 | 06May07 | O 4969 | fix judicial turns | Zefram| 1 | 08May07 | O Aside from failing quorum, both of these passed by a large margin. I presume you'll repropose The Standing Court; if so, you

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 4958 - 4969

2007-05-23 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: I'll do that later when I have some time. We're interpreting quorum as calculated when the Assessor resolves the Agoran decision, right? Nearly. It's when the Assessor performs the calculations to determine the results, which appears to be a distinct step that occurs finitely

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 4958 - 4969

2007-05-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: I'll do that later when I have some time. We're interpreting quorum as calculated when the Assessor resolves the Agoran decision, right? Nearly. It's when the Assessor performs the calculations to determine the results, which appears to be a distinct step

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 4958 - 4969

2007-05-23 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: They're not required to, but they are required by R208(d) to specify the outcome of the Agoran decision. Right. There were a couple that you showed as failed quorum, so those ones are already legally resolved; the others won't be resolved until you post the revised results.