On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
On Aug 1, 2015 12:24, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox, was present in the ruleset
published on
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
To this end, the current precedent of switches is: if a move would
put part of the game into an
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ok, here's what the first paradox was... What's your pseudo-judgement?
The Not Your Turn card would cancel the effect of any card played
in the last 24 hours (meant as a
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
To this end, the current precedent of switches is: if a
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote:
I support. Why not?
To vote, you'll have to wait for the proposal to be distributed by the Promotor.
Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox, was present in the ruleset
published on 25 August 2013, but absent in the ruleset published on 17
December 2013. I couldn't find any proposals which repealed the rule.
So where did it go?
(I don't miss it, and I would oppose any attempt to put it back.)
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ok, here's what the first paradox was... What's your pseudo-judgement?
The Not Your Turn card would cancel the effect of any card played
in the last 24 hours (meant as a defense card).
The Discard Picking card let you
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Aug 1, 2015 12:24, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote:
Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox, was present in the ruleset
published on 25 August 2013, but absent in the
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Aug 1, 2015 12:24, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox,
On Aug 1, 2015 12:24, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rule 2358, which defined Win by Paradox, was present in the ruleset
published on 25 August 2013, but absent in the ruleset published on 17
December 2013. I couldn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
