Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-06-07 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/6/7 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Ed Murphy wrote: BobTHJ wrote: Please! Trim these messages before responding. Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work. I do. It's the GMail guys who use tabs. The GMail huys who use RTF. I've turned that off. -- -Tiger

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-06-06 Thread Roger Hicks
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 17:36, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: ~~~ Far to much quoting done here, omitted for brevity ~~~ This appeal seems to have been ignored by the CotC. NoV em for it, then. Please! Trim these messages before responding. BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-06-06 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: Please! Trim these messages before responding. Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-06-06 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: BobTHJ wrote: Please! Trim these messages before responding. Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work. I do. It's the GMail guys who use tabs.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-05-31 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: I appeal this judgment. Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3 Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-05-31 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: ais523 wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: I appeal this judgment. Since I spent a Note to remove

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-05-31 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proto-proto: If an entity is required to destroy a Rest in the possession of a player with no Rests, it CAN by announcement create a Note of a specified pitch and a Rest in the possession of that player. Or just allow negative rests. We've had in

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-05-30 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: I appeal this judgment. Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3 Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if the judgment is overruled, remanded, or reassigned, you repay me in

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-05-30 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: I appeal this judgment. Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3 Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro

2009-05-29 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Yally wrote: At the time I submitted that report, I was fully aware of this rule but I also legitamately thought that I was not breaching it. From my point of view, I don't have very many options. There is a plaintext