On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For one thing, Quazie's EVLOD is 5, right? Assuming we treat this as
pseudo-C, the result differs depending on whether myevlod is an int
(5/2 = 2; FOR AGAINST FOR AGAINST PRESENT) or a float (5.0/2 = 2.5;
FOR AGAINST FOR AGAINST
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5637 O1 1Quazie Agora is my conditional value
I change my vote to ENDORSE Agora x4
I don't think this works; under no circumstances can a rule
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that ENDORSE Agora was already defined.. I remember seeing
it somewhere.. maybe it was in a proto and I got confused and thought
that it was in a rule..
Umm, you saw it in the proposal you're voting on conditionally.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that ENDORSE Agora was already defined.. I remember seeing
it somewhere.. maybe it was in a proto and I got confused and thought
that it was in a
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that ENDORSE Agora was already defined.. I remember seeing
it somewhere.. maybe it
On Monday 14 July 2008 08:40:02 am Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5637 O1 1Quazie Agora is my conditional value
I change my vote to ENDORSE Agora x4
I don't think this works; under no circumstances can a rule take
effect
Wooble wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5637 O1 1Quazie Agora is my conditional value
I change my vote to ENDORSE Agora x4
I don't think this works; under no circumstances can a rule take
effect before the votes on it are counted, so relying
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Sgeo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that ENDORSE Agora was already defined.. I
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:39 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SPLIT DECISION should be evaluated as follows:
---
for (int i = 0; i myevlod/2; i ++)
{
vote FOR;
vote AGAINST;
}
vote PRESENT;
---
In other words, you
comex wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a proposal is Democratic I vote FOR it.
If a proposal is written by me I vote FORx5 on it.
if a proposal does not fit into the above two categories I vote SPLIT
DECISION on it.
SPLIT DECISION should be
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:42 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a proposal is Democratic I vote FOR it.
If a proposal is written by me I vote FORx5 on it.
if
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (int i = 0; i myevlod/2; i ++)
{
vote FOR;
vote AGAINST;
}
vote PRESENT;
It seems clear enough too me.
For one thing, Quazie's EVLOD is 5, right?
On Jul 14, 2008, at 7:04 PM, Quazie wrote:
The proposal was an ordinary proposal. Thus, I can vote up to my
evlod on it. Thus i vote an equal number of FORs and AGAINSTs and if
there are any left over I vote PRESENT.
Then maybe we should define SUPPOSE as exactly that simple wording.
-
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:39 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (int i = 0; i myevlod/2; i ++)
{
vote FOR;
vote AGAINST;
}
vote PRESENT;
It seems
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:39 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (int i = 0; i myevlod/2; i
comex wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (int i = 0; i myevlod/2; i ++)
{
vote FOR;
vote AGAINST;
}
vote PRESENT;
It seems clear enough too me.
For one thing, Quazie's
16 matches
Mail list logo
