Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Would this work?

>But this wouldn't work in the same way that the Registrar need not track >contract-defined switches. The reason the Registrar need not track such switches is that switches are defined as within the rules. Duties can be imposed by non-rule things. On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:31 PM, VJ Rada

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Would this work?

>If you were also, Treasuror, with distributions, you could be even more >efficient Yes, yeah, I already pointed out that o could get infinite favours this way On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > If you were also,