Sounds good for the sell side, but I'd still like to see I buy up to
X VP worth of votes in the obvious optimal fashion refactored as well.
Not quite sure how to make that one work. Care to take a stab at it?
I'm not sure about auto-optimization, but the current contract text
supports a
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
Casting a vote of SELL (X) on a proposal is equivalent to posting a
Sell Ticket with a cost of X and endorsing the filler of that Sell
Ticket.?
Sounds good for the sell side, but I'd still like to see I buy up
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking personally, the more effort it takes, the less often anyone
will bother. I suggest amending the Vote Market so that, instead of
a three-step specific process:
Alice I offer to sell my vote on 6000 for 1 VP
Bob
BobTHJ wrote:
Casting a vote of SELL (X) on a proposal is equivalent to posting a
Sell Ticket with a cost of X and endorsing the filler of that Sell
Ticket.?
Sounds good for the sell side, but I'd still like to see I buy up to
X VP worth of votes in the obvious optimal fashion refactored as
BobTHJ wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is absurd. You've set up an impossible condition if no one's buying.
I state that the fact of no one being willing to buy even the cheapest
of votes is a state not envisioned by the contract, and
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
both above the limit for an instant? We could do that
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
both above the
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh hey, comex!
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
Actually, there has been more Vote Market activity in the past month
then in the six months previously. There have certainly been
opportunities to gain VP, and there presently exist at least 10 open
tickets. Just not much of it has been for the buying
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
Actually, there has been more Vote Market activity in the past month
then in the six months previously. There have certainly been
opportunities to gain VP, and there presently exist
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
Actually, there has been more Vote Market activity in the past month
then in the six months previously. There have certainly been
opportunities to gain VP, and there presently exist at least 10 open
tickets. Just not much of it has been for the buying
Goethe wrote:
By the way, does OBLIGATED in all caps have any meaning other than
the standard definition of the word (not in all-caps)? I can't find it.
(This isn't a prelude to trying to weasel out of anything, I'm just
curious if I'm missing something somewhere).
I thought it was in MMI,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
If you ask me Vote Market is finally starting to act as it was envisioned.
Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep offering things
for sale when I'm below 50, but if no one accepts even at the cheapest
price after good faith effort, that
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
Goethe wrote:
By the way, does OBLIGATED in all caps have any meaning other than
the standard definition of the word (not in all-caps)? I can't find it.
(This isn't a prelude to trying to weasel out of anything, I'm just
curious if I'm missing
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
If you ask me Vote Market is finally starting to act as it was envisioned.
Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep offering things
for sale when I'm below 50, but if no
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
Goethe wrote:
By the way, does OBLIGATED in all caps have any meaning other than
the standard definition of the word (not in all-caps)? I can't find it.
(This isn't a prelude
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
If you ask me Vote Market is finally starting to act as it was envisioned.
Fair enough. I'm happy enough to be required to keep offering
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
both above the limit for an instant? We could do that monthly as long
as our combo sums to 50. -Goethe
How much do you two trust each other?
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
On Thursday 26 June 2008 8:30:54 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oh hey, comex! Want to do a back-and-forth for trade for free to get us
both above the limit for an instant? We could do that monthly as long
as our combo sums to 50. -Goethe
How much do you two
19 matches
Mail list logo
