2009/6/3 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
An attornor CAN attorning to perform a specific action by announcement
if the attornee is party to a contract that specifically allows (...)
Should this be CAN attorn?
--
-Tiger
2009/6/3 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I intend, without Objection, to add ora...@cs.indiana.edu as a send-only
address to agora-busin...@agoranomic.org.
What effect does this have,
2009/6/3 Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com:
It is POSSIBLE to attorn if the attornee is party to a Public
contract explicitly permitting acting on behalf of the attornee.
I think there is a bug in here allowing anyone to act on behalf of me
even if the contract only permits, say, a
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
I object to making Siege inactive.
Can we inactivate by proposal?
2009/6/3 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to make Siege inactive.
I object to making Siege inactive.
Can we inactivate
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
Sorry, but this fails as the order is unspecified.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
{
Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
contract to which the person
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:18 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
{
Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
A person CAN on behalf of
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
The Assessor's report contains a list of all pending intents to
perform dependent actions.
Doesn't really work; just post your sneaky intent immediately after
the Assessor's report is published and you
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/3 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I award myself a Cyan Ribbon (I deputized for the IADoP a long time ago
but never awarded myself a ribbon).
Also, I award myself a Green
2009/6/3 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/6/3 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I award myself a Cyan Ribbon (I deputized for the IADoP a long time ago
but never awarded myself a
Someone attempts to inactivate you.
(A) Start participating
(B) Let it happen
(C) Just object without justification for eternity, inflating quorum.
C
On 2009-06-03, Christian Julius thesi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without
As Wooble said, the PBA is bootstrapped and simpler than the IBA to boot - but
Step 1. Gain active economy.
On 2009-06-03, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
Pavitra
Sucks
The iPhone
But
I'm sorry
On 2009-06-03, Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
What about private contracts?
It was suggested recently, and I think I agree, that private
act-on-behalf authorization is generally a Bad Thing because it makes it
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
On 2009-06-03, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Paul VanKoughnett
allisp...@gmail.comwrote:
Clearly I'm a player. I registered in the seventh sentence of my first
e-mail.
And, Yally, I've
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
options
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff
c-walker wrote:
No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot rely on everyone being subscribed to a-d)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot
He had it for B.
On 2009-06-03, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c-walker wrote:
No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
--
C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I've lurked since 2005... kind of. I was interested in Agora in 2005,
but did not participate, nor did I ask to be a watcher. I was
subscribed to a-d, but
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I'm not antilurk. I'm merely a hands on learner.
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
attempted to and caused a CFJ, *then* registered. And no, you can't
have your frisbee back. -G.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
attempted to and caused a CFJ, *then* registered. And
comex wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
All this is far more complicated than it's worth.
{
Amend rule 1742 (Contracts) by appending the paragraph:
� � �A person CAN on behalf of another as authorized by a public
� � �contract to
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
attempted to and
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this place. Well, I
attempted to and caused a CFJ, *then* registered. And no,
Directed at Yally.
On 2009-06-03, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Sgeo sgeos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I'm not
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I didn't. Registered within an hour of finding this
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a printout copy of the ruleset the first time i started agora.
I ran out of paper.
Double sided.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:30, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the IBA, deposit all my crops in it, and request subsidy.
I CFJ on: Pavitra owns at least 1 crop.
Evidence: comex claims the
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a printout copy of the ruleset the first time i started agora.
I ran out of paper.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Arguments: Pavitra didn't say I transfer all my crops to the IBA,
instead e attempted to perform an action defined by the IBA contract
(deposit) which if successful would result in the transfer of assets
from Pavitra to the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 13:51, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
Arguments: Pavitra didn't say I transfer all my crops to the IBA,
instead e attempted to perform an action defined by the IBA contract
(deposit) which
Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
transfers (before the amendment I proposed, which specifies a default
order,
comex wrote:
Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
transfers (before the amendment I proposed, which specifies a
Ed Murphy wrote:
comex wrote:
Actions in Agora are generally ordered; unordered actions are accepted
only when they cause no ambiguity because the order is unimportant to
the rules. Assets are rule-defined entities and allowing the unordered
transfers (before the amendment I proposed,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
To reduce long-term ambiguity, I deposit all my crops in the IBA in the
order that maximizes the net amount of zm thereby gained.
If this is correct:
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Pavitra wrote:
I'm assuming the last word of paragraph 3 should have been Black.
Yes, copy+paste error.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P
I
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Quazie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/6/4 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
eligible
voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:19, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). �The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:58 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
YOU MAY CALL ME BIG FUCKING EDWARD
Does that mean comex is now BIG FUCKING EDWARD?
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:19, Benjamin
Caplancelestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:58 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
diff format). ?The eligible voters are the
comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
To reduce long-term ambiguity, I deposit all my crops in the IBA in the
order that maximizes the net amount of zm thereby gained.
If this is correct:
Player 0 1 2 3 4 5
Yally wrote:
I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP,
and the options are Murphy (incumbent), You May Call Me Big Fucking
Edward, and PRESENT.
I vote for Me.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not a
player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
deregistration or
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while
not a
Trivial typo != ambiguity
On 2009-06-04, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
eligible voters are the active players, the
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not
a
player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
deregistration or
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an election to decide the holder of the CotC office. The
eligible voters are the active players, the vote
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Trivial typo != ambiguity
Eir CFJ does not check for ambiguities. E is just pointing it out.
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart luke.lockh...@gmail.comwrote:
I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
-Yally
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart luke.lockh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
-Yally
I
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart luke.lockh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
Can non-players get crim CFJs? What if players committed crimes prior
to eir registration? If you were a second-class person, would its
parties be liable?
If it were, then Luke's message would have been ambiguous.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Of course, in terms of shortest lurk time, Michael will always win.
-G.
Not really. I received a grand total of 0 game messages before registering.
I assume you were subscribed for a positive finite time?
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart luke.lockh...@gmail.comwrote:
I have no idea what is going on here but wish to join you.
Welcome to Agora. Is there any nickname you would like to use?
Er, not knowing what one is wishing and not using
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Of course, in terms of shortest lurk time, Michael will always win.
-G.
Not really. I received a grand total of 0 game messages before registering.
I assume you were
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Irresistable. I transfer a prop from G. to Murphy (sorry, nothing personal).
If I have not already done so this week, I transfer a from coppro to
ehird because ditto. -G.
I attempt the above
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Irresistable. I transfer a prop from G. to Murphy (sorry, nothing
personal).
If I have not already done so this week, I transfer a from coppro to
ehird
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I transfer a prop from Murphy to coppro because this whole line of prop
transfering is inane.
Actually, it's the whole purpose of Props = harmless way to vent ire.
Then again your transfer also fulfilled said purpose. -G.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
Irresistable. I transfer a prop from G. to Murphy (sorry, nothing
personal).
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Luke Lockhart luke.lockh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have no idea
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
You're not a player.
I'm not?
Shit, when did I get deregistered?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're not a player.
I'm not?
Shit, when did I get deregistered?
You never registered, at least not recently.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Of course, in terms of shortest lurk time, Michael will always win.
-G.
Not really. I
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
You at least heard of Agora before you joined it.
I pledge to transfer a prop from myself to the first person who, while not a
player and not barred from registering (either due to recent
deregistration or
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.comwrote:
Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally.
Doesn't get my vote unless you poll whom amongst us also deserves this.
-G.
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.comwrote:
Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally.
Doesn't get my vote unless you poll whom amongst us also deserves this.
-G.
Agreed.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're not a player.
I'm not?
Shit, when did I get
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're not a player.
I'm not?
Shit, when did I get
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein
Craig Daniel wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're not a player.
I'm not?
Shit,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
(11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word Agora mean anything not
directly related to either Greece or agoraphobia to you?
Evidence.
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
Craig Daniel wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
I call a CFJ on the statement: Luke Lockhart is a player.
Having restored my playerhood, I do so again, probably efficaciously this
time.
I'd retract the second one; you don't need to be a player to
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
(11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word Agora mean anything not
directly related to either Greece or agoraphobia to you?
Evidence.
Kyle
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
(11:16:39 PM) craigbdaniel: Does the word Agora mean anything
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before you
created it. E created it.
E had probably played/watched a lot more nomic than I had.
I'd read Steve Gardner's Nomic World reports, and that was it. I think
this was through a mailing list
teucer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
I call a CFJ on the statement: Luke Lockhart is a player.
Having restored my playerhood, I do so again, probably efficaciously this
time.
It was effective the first time. You can retract the second case.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before you
created it. E created it.
E had probably played/watched a lot more nomic than I had.
I'd read Steve Gardner's Nomic World reports, and that was
teucer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
You never registered, at least not recently.
I believed I registered on January 3, and was immediately NOV'd for
IIRC you are also the Craig that was registered from 25 Apr 02
to 9 Mar 03.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Craig Daniel teu...@pobox.com wrote:
(11:16:39 PM)
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
I retract my proposal Very little to no lurk time.
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I do I signed up, immediately registered, and jumped right in.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before you
created it. E created it.
E had probably played/watched a lot more nomic
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
teucer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
You never registered, at least not recently.
I believed I registered on January 3, and was immediately NOV'd for
IIRC you are also the Craig that was
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Oh hey you're that Craig? I remember your CFJs fondly. -G.
Huh. I don't remember them at all. But yes, I'm the same Craig.
...how bad were they?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz zeckal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Michael Norrish wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
But Michael created the game. You at least heard of agora before
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
when someone won, and someone indeed did
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
Original ruleset defined games
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
when someone won, and someone indeed did in the first year or so.
On a related note, here's a question: how many here
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Oh hey you're that Craig? I remember your CFJs fondly. -G.
Huh. I don't remember them at all. But yes, I'm the same Craig.
...how bad were they?
Not bad at all. Actually
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
when someone won, and someone indeed did
100 matches
Mail list logo
