On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
{
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is
either none (default) or an integral multiple
The host I use for the lists is going down for good soon, and I don't
have a convenient place to move them. Anyone willing to host a few
mailing lists?
[cc: me, I'm not subscribed]
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
On 01/17/2012 05:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
{
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
The host I use for the lists is going down for good soon, and I don't
have a convenient place to move them. Anyone willing to host a few
mailing lists?
I'm willing to host one or two, but my server is by no means beefy, so
I'd sort
On 17 January 2012 23:39, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/17/2012 05:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
{
On 01/17/2012 06:27 PM, Arkady English wrote:
And the thing here is that total votes DO matter. There are Tv = Vf+Va
voters, so if 1 person votes against (i.e. Va = 1) the highest
possible adoption index that could be reached is (T-1). Thus by
setting the adoption index greater than (T-1) a
6 matches
Mail list logo
