Re: DIS: To All: The Identification Crisis
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 18:29 -0400, Henri Bouchard wrote: Who actually thinks Mandatory Identification is a good idea? When I was proposing it, I didn't think it would be such a big problem for everybody, but now it seems we should just repeal it. What do you think? I supported it precisely because I thought it would end up in a mess like the one we have at the moment; in other words, I wanted to see what would happen. And as for what would happen, I'm not certain it's stopped happening yet. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3407 assigned to scshunt
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: My thinking atm is that Cards are extrajudicial and therefore no mechanism for reconsideration need exist. Opinions? -scshunt If you decide that Cards do not exist, will I get receive compensation for the apology I gave? :) -Henri
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3407 assigned to scshunt
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: [Arbitor's note: scshunt informally favored this case. Good enough for me while I get a system sorted]. My thinking atm is that Cards are extrajudicial and therefore no mechanism for reconsideration need exist. Opinions? You definitely have a case there. Just thinking out loud, my counterargument might be that, if we assume from recent rule changes that we're heading away from the society metaphor and towards the game metaphor, that a referee fits the common definition of a judge for the game. Also that keeping track of wrongdoing makes it clear that we're talking about judging players formally.
