I didn't get it from OFF, but did from the other two.
-Aris
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018, 10:45 PM Corona wrote:
> This was delivered to me from all three lists. Does Official work again?
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Ned Strange
> wrote:
>
> > Test
> >
> > --
> > From V.J. Rada
>
This was delivered to me from all three lists. Does Official work again?
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Test
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
Test
--
>From V.J. Rada
I think it might be time to start using the method of doing actions by
directly messaging each player
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I am getting BUS including your tests
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> I haven't received anything from
I am getting BUS including your tests
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I haven't received anything from BUS in my inbox for 48 hours.
> It's clear froM DIS that others have, I'm missing major threads.
> Is anyone else NOT receiving from BUS (but is from DIS?) Never
>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
- In terms of automation, a system would have to distinguish initial
reports from replies-to-the-report both in subject lines or in messages.
This is why I said the [officer] had to be the first thing on the
subject line (to prevent "Re:" messages from
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> blip
>
yah, so my subscription was disabled. Fixed, but I'm 99.999% sure
that it wasn't something that was set on my end.
I haven't received anything from BUS in my inbox for 48 hours.
It's clear froM DIS that others have, I'm missing major threads.
Is anyone else NOT receiving from BUS (but is from DIS?) Never
had this issue before.
Actually, I wonder if the problems mightn't run even deeper than that. I don't
think "I do the same thing as the last X people in this thread" necessarily
implies "I do the same thing as the last X people in this thread _did in this
thread_". Aris, V.J. Rada and I have all previously performed
On Sat, 2018-06-23 at 23:25 +0200, Corona wrote:
> I'm not using infinite regression. I'm basing my vote on the next
> (hypothetical) player to vote, who would vote "I do the same as the last
> six people in this thread", the six people being Aris, VJ Rada, twg,
> ATMunn, Trigon (who all voted FOR
I'm not using infinite regression. I'm basing my vote on the next
(hypothetical) player to vote, who would vote "I do the same as the last
six people in this thread", the six people being Aris, VJ Rada, twg,
ATMunn, Trigon (who all voted FOR all proposals) and me.
Thus the only way for their
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:06 AM Alex Smith
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 09:48 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > Historically we've aggressively avoided mandating format, but I for
> > > one have no problem mandating that for a Report to be a
On 6/23/2018 6:07 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Any party to this contract MAY, by announcement, move a chess
piece.
I think in place of MAY you want "CAN, subject to the restrictions
of this contract,"
Ah, I hadn't read rule 2152 carefully enough - I hadn't realised MAY
and CAN were subtly
On June 23, 2018 10:07 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Ah, that's a misconception I hadn't realised I had - that switches are
> necessarily tracked by the same person as their entities. Looking over this
> that's actually the root cause of many of the other problems with this. I'll
> read the
Awesome, thanks for the feedback!
On June 21, 2018 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Define who tracks these switches or are they untracked? (being the
> recordkeepor for chess pieces doesn't mean recordkeepor for the switches).
Ah, that's a misconception I hadn't realised I had - that switches are
Getting into fractional reserve territory here, right?
~Corona
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 1:16 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> I bid 20 coins on each auction.
>
>
> On 6/22/2018 5:10 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
>> I bid 17 coins on auction 1.
>>
>> On 6/22/2018 2:59 PM, Corona wrote:
>>
>>> I bid 16 coins on
16 matches
Mail list logo
