We evaluate votes at the time they are cast (iirc, unless we added
future conditionals back in). This vote, under the circumstances, was
a conditional with sufficient context within the game state. If
somebody made a vote like this without any previous context, it may be
ambiguous. Under these
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> wasn't this overhauled? in a cfj by alexis banning future conditionals
> in votes? i don't know where I am anymore.
Proposal 7922 last October fixed the Rule to make it absolutely clear
that it's evaluated at the end of the voting period. IIRC it was
Not about a missing email, no. Sorry if that was misunderstood.
On 6/24/2018 2:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Is this case about a missing email, or about using "I do the same thing"
to try and vote?
If it's about the email problems, could you provide as Evidence the
message from your Sent Mail
Agreed. I don't really like the THAN thing though. How about something
brand new. Technomancer? Forumkeeper? Something with a ring to it.
-Aris
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018, 10:20 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I would happily endorse such a thing. In addition to a special title,
> a HAN is appropriate
Neither have I.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I have not received it.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:28 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> > Nope, it was much later than
Is this case about a missing email, or about using "I do the same thing"
to try and vote?
If it's about the email problems, could you provide as Evidence the
message from your Sent Mail or something, with headers?
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement:
>
>
Did you receive it directly from me or via discussion?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Yes! What did you change?
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On June 24, 2018 8:58 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
Gratituous arguments: You need to "publish a notice" to vote. R478/Fora
says:
'A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent to all
players and containing a clear designation of intent to be public. [...] A
person "publishes" or "announces" something by sending a public
twg
On 6/24/2018 12:55 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
This could be one of the infamous problems with gmail. Have you
received this message?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I haven't received it, and I also haven't
I haven't, no. Very bizarre. I have been receiving email from other Gmail users
like ATMunn and Corona, so I'm not sure what the problem might be.
If it helps narrow anything down, the last email I received from you was on
June 22, 2018 10:16 PM UTC, saying you liked Corona's suggestion of a
Did you receive this?
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I haven't, no. Very bizarre. I have been receiving email from other Gmail
> users like ATMunn and Corona, so I'm not sure what the problem might be.
>
> If it helps narrow anything down, the last email I received
I haven't received it, and I also haven't received any of PSS's messages to DIS
that you're all replying to.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On June 24, 2018 4:20 PM, Corona wrote:
>
>
> Neither have I.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Publius Scribonius
I also got it from OFF although I haven't been getting other messages from it.
This shit gnarly man. We can officially designate anything as a public
forum. Maybe we should start exploring options.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
>
>>
I am writing to let everyone know that my judgement on CFJ 3642 will
be delayed, as I wait for some evidence from omd. I would also like to
take this time to thank G. and omd for their cooperation in providing
evidence for my judgement.
wasn't this overhauled? in a cfj by alexis banning future conditionals
in votes? i don't know where I am anymore.
Situationally, though, it evaluates as FOR. ais's hypothetical
situation in which infinite people vote that way means only that if
infinite people voted with this conditional, the
I would happily endorse such a thing. In addition to a special title,
a HAN is appropriate I think.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I would like to express my sincere thanks to omd for eir continued
> support of the mailing lists. I hope that everyone recognizes
This could be one of the infamous problems with gmail. Have you
received this message?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I haven't received it, and I also haven't received any of PSS's messages to
> DIS that you're all replying
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
This was delivered to me from all three lists. Does Official work again?
I didn't get the OFF one.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 09:22 +1000, Rebecca wrote:
> Corona voted in this way
> "> I vote on these proposals in such a manner that, in a hypothetical
> > alternate gamestate identical to the current one except for me never
> > sending the message immediately before this one, and this message not
>
Nope, votes are the exception to that. Votes are evaluated at the time
of resolution.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Rebecca wrote:
> We evaluate votes at the time they are cast (iirc, unless we added
> future conditionals back in). This vote, under the
I would like to express my sincere thanks to omd for eir continued
support of the mailing lists. I hope that everyone recognizes what
hard work it is to manage web servers. I would be interested in
awarding them the patent title, "Technical Hero of Agora" or a lesser
patent title, if a heroic
Must have been directly from em, because I didn't recieve the in between
message.
On 6/24/2018 5:08 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
Did you receive it directly from me or via discussion?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Rebecca wrote:
I do so.
You were too late as proposal 8050 passed, and pledges are no longer
retractable.
Fortunately that doesn't matter, as all your pledges were older than 60
days.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
Without
I received it from BUS and DIS, but not OFF.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 8:41 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Received from business.
>
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at
Interestingly, looking at the list of mailing lists on the mailman
instance, OFF does not appear:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I disagree. I think that the clear context resolves any ambiguity that may
exist.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Actually, I wonder if the problems mightn't run even deeper than that. I
> don't think "I do the same thing as the
received, if that helps.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> bloop
>
>
>
>
I don't think that that is necessary.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> I think it might be time to start using the method of doing actions by
> directly messaging each player
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Ned Strange
> wrote:
>
Received from discussion.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Test
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
Received from business.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Test
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
I sent a message to BUS yesterday in the thread following the latest
Promotor report. Did anyone get it? I don't seem to have gotten a copy
myself, but that could just be my client.
What was it called?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:04 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> I sent a message to BUS yesterday in the thread following the latest
> Promotor report. Did anyone get it? I don't seem to have gotten a copy
> myself, but that could just be my client.
It was just a reply. Probably 'BUS: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Promotor]
Distribution of Proposals 8054-8057'
On 6/24/2018 10:05 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
What was it called?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:04 AM, ATMunn wrote:
I sent a message to
This?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
-- Forwarded message --
From: ATMunn
Date: Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: BUS: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8054-8057
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
I do the same as the last three people in this thread.
On
Nope, it was much later than that.
On 6/24/2018 10:11 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
This?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
-- Forwarded message --
From: ATMunn
Date: Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: BUS: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals
I have not received it.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:28 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> Nope, it was much later than that.
>
>
> On 6/24/2018 10:11 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>>
>> This?
>>
>>
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>>
>>
>>
>> --
36 matches
Mail list logo
