I would personally argue that a proposal does not need to take effect in
order to simply _describe_ permisibility of an action, and thus this
rule would delegate to all such proposals, even those not yet adopted or
those explicitly voted down.
Jason Cobb
On 6/10/19 8:28 PM, Kerim Aydin
i bid 8 coins
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:06 PM James Cook wrote:
> There is one ongoing zombie auction.
>
> Lots:
> 1. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> 2. Corona
> 3. Hālian
> 4. Tarhalindur
>
> Bids:
> 2019-06-07T17:01Z. Rance. 7 Coins.
> 2019-06-08T00:59Z. omd. 10 Coins.
> 2019-06-10T08:17Z.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 02:06, James Cook wrote:
> 2019-06-07T17:01Z. Rance. 7 Coins.
Oops, I forgot to reformat that. That notation means it was at 17:01
UTC on June 7.
It's hard to tell that the rest of your message is quoted. I suspect
Yahoo mail interacts badly with the mailing list somehow. Maybe it
doesn't format the text version of the email very well.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 03:36, Rance Bedwell wrote:
>
> I withdraw the below CFJ. omd has shown me the
On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 10:56 +1000, Rebecca wrote:
> yes! it is an informal request rather than anything defined by the
> rules, i dont know why we say it that way.
It used to be a rules-defined action. People kept the phrasing once the
rule in question got repealed, and the Arbitor kept honouring
yes! it is an informal request rather than anything defined by the rules, i
dont know why we say it that way.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:55 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I keep hearing this and I don't know what it means. Does
> it mean that you wish to be the Judge?
>
> Jason Cobb
>
>
I'm sorry, but I keep hearing this and I don't know what it means. Does
it mean that you wish to be the Judge?
Jason Cobb
On 6/10/19 8:53 PM, Rebecca wrote:
i favor this one
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
On general principle - yep! The Rules can delegate to other
i favor this one
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:28 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On general principle - yep! The Rules can delegate to other documents like
> that. A good example is Tournaments (R2464) where winning is delegated -
> at times we've allowed tournaments to hold/award Coins and change
On general principle - yep! The Rules can delegate to other documents like
that. A good example is Tournaments (R2464) where winning is delegated -
at times we've allowed tournaments to hold/award Coins and change other
game quantities other than winning.
For Proposals specifically I think
I might be missing some precedent here, but if the wording was "except
as described by a proposal or rule", then couldn't I submit a proposal
that says something to the effect of "Any player CAN, by announcement,
expunge any number of Blots from emself." and then have that wording
captured by
I think Agora we would be ok with the intuition on this one just in
terms of grammar, except we've given very specific different legal meanings
between a rule doing something and a person doing something as authorized by
a rule, due to our instruments and power system. So there's a CFJ history
I could see this coming out either way. It's the sort of hyper literalist
interpretation that Agorans seem to adopt sometimes.
It's really interesting to me, because within my discipline (law), those sorts
of hyperliteralist interpretations simply wouldn't work. Lawyers would just
intuitively
Interesting catch.
It's the difference between "except by a proposal or rule" versus
"except as described by a proposal or rule" which is the usual phrasing
that would work fine - so the question is can we infer the "as described"
part - which might be a hard sell given how picky we usually
This is creative! But performing the ritual is a regulated action, and
therefore it can be performed only using methods expressly specified in the
rules (per Rule 2125).
> On Jun 9, 2019, at 9:22 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> There's no such thing as a Call for *Justice*. :)
>
> Jason Cobb
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
