A friendly reminder: it is a new quarter. This means that fugitive and
karma decay occur.
[Just posting this to the list because people have forgotten before, and
I'm thinking of it now.]
--
Jason Cobb
On 7/2/20 8:38 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
> MONTHLY REPORTS
>
> Office ReportLast Published Late
>
> Coopor Barrels, Bargains 1969-12-31 !!!
On 7/2/20 2:28 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 7/2/2020 11:21 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> I was looking at Rule 2472, and I'm confused by the incompatibility of
>> the Assessor and the Associate Director of Personnel. At no place in the
>> ruleset can I find a
On 7/2/2020 2:27 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
On 7/2/2020 11:05 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
Thank you for the input. I will definitely take a closer look at those
previous cases and incorporate them into my judgement. It's my bad for
not at least briefly looking for
On 7/2/2020 11:21 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I was looking at Rule 2472, and I'm confused by the incompatibility of
> the Assessor and the Associate Director of Personnel. At no place in the
> ruleset can I find a conflict of interest between the two offices. Did
> one
Rule 2472/4 (Power=2)
Office Incompatibilities
Some pairs of office are incompatible:
1. Prime Minister and Speaker
2. Promotor and Assessor
3. Assessor and ADoP
4. Referee and Arbitor
Yeah, I will do that. See my reply to G.'s reply.
On 7/2/2020 2:03 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/2/20 12:40 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
I have put together my judgement for CFJ 3860 [assuming that is the
number it will be assigned by the CotC]. I am mainly publishing this
Thank you for the input. I will definitely take a closer look at those
previous cases and incorporate them into my judgement. It's my bad for
not at least briefly looking for previous precedents. If someone finds
that other successful hidden message from 2018, I will incorporate that too.
On
On 7/2/20 12:40 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> I have put together my judgement for CFJ 3860 [assuming that is the
> number it will be assigned by the CotC]. I am mainly publishing this as
> a draft and not an official judgement because I want to wait for
> confirmation that it is
On 7/2/2020 10:40 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> I have put together my judgement for CFJ 3860 [assuming that is the
> number it will be assigned by the CotC]. I am mainly publishing this as
> a draft and not an official judgement because I want to wait for
> confirmation that it is
I have put together my judgement for CFJ 3860 [assuming that is the
number it will be assigned by the CotC]. I am mainly publishing this as
a draft and not an official judgement because I want to wait for
confirmation that it is actually CFJ 3860. Unless someone finds a major
issue with my logic,
On 7/2/2020 8:18 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/2/20 10:14 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> One strange thing here is that Bard is mixed in with a long list of
>> other titles in R2581, but (from this point of view) is arguably more
>> similar to degrees than those other
On 7/2/20 10:14 AM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> One strange thing here is that Bard is mixed in with a long list of
> other titles in R2581, but (from this point of view) is arguably more
> similar to degrees than those other titles.
>
> Also, I recently noticed the description of
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 14:15, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> On 7/1/20 12:15 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> > tl;dr What do people think about a separate method for arts degrees that's
> > more akin to applause and somehow brings in Bard? (just in
On 7/1/20 12:15 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> tl;dr What do people think about a separate method for arts degrees that's
> more akin to applause and somehow brings in Bard? (just in general).
>
> longer:
>
> I didn't think about this when voting last month, but the new art
On 7/2/20 4:21 AM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> Arguments:
>
> at 12:43 AM, Becca Lee via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>> I clearly meant that i transfer the cards nch had, "those cards" into
>> products in 4 sets of 4. obviously i did not mean that 18 is 4x4.
> Your rephrased version is
On 7/1/20 11:59 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
>> 8462* Jason, Falsifian 3.0 Fee-based methods
> AGAINST, because the last paragraph is scammable as a power escalation
You appear to be right, but that's also a problem with current rule:
> If the Rules define a fee-based
On 7/1/20 11:43 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> at 7:26 AM, Becca Lee via agora-business
> [](mailto:agora-busin...@agoranomic.org)
> wrote:
>
>> {Acting on behalf of nch, I resolve one of eir intents to deregister R.
>> Lee. I register. I award myself a welcome package. I transfer a victory
this judgement is currently vacated due to the motion to reconsider, just
to note for the class.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:36 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3851
> (This document is
the fact that you were mathematically confused by "4 sets of 4" doesn't
really mean that it's confusing
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:52 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> Reading it initially, I was a bit confused by how the math worked out and
> I do think it could
Reading it initially, I was a bit confused by how the math worked out and I do
think it could have been sufficiently ambiguous to cause it to fail.
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 08:34, Becca Lee via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> It's obvious what you meant, at least given enough context.
> It's obvious what you meant, at least given enough context. It’s not at
>all obvious to me that what you said is close enough to what you meant.
But if what I said is "obvious", and all the context you have is the actual
words I used in the message, what i said automatically clearly conveys
> > I repeat the above actions in braces so that they happen 16 times total.
> > Nch has 18 victory cards and 18 justice cards.
> >
> > I act on nch’s behalf to pay those victory and justice cards into
> products
> > in 4 sets of 4 so that e has 40 victory points and 40 Blot-B-Gones.
"those
Arguments:
at 12:43 AM, Becca Lee via agora-discussion
wrote:
I clearly meant that i transfer the cards nch had, "those cards" into
products in 4 sets of 4. obviously i did not mean that 18 is 4x4.
Your rephrased version is still self-contradictory to my ears. You didn’t
say that you
this is so extremely obvious that you calling a CFJ on it is actually
harmful to gameplay.
Also regarding the what is clearly thing, see these CFJs (this is a copiedm
essage from discord, putting ito n list.
3667 found that non-quotes buried in quotes worked. 3676 found that putting
it actually
I clearly meant that i transfer the cards nch had, "those cards" into
products in 4 sets of 4. obviously i did not mean that 18 is 4x4.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:44 PM omd via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> at 7:26 AM, Becca Lee via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> > {Acting
26 matches
Mail list logo
