On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 20:10 -0400, ihope wrote:
The proposal system's 12 (actually higher than 12, of course) gets
bigger whenever 26 gets bigger. A with-support rule's 12 does not.
I challenge that actually higher; barring vetos, I believe that a team
of 11 Scamsters working together could
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 18:05 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/9/21 Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do I have to do anything now to take care of crimes I committed back then?
To the best of my knowledge, you are a free man.
Blot crimes
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
require a detailed knowledge of how it works.) As non-Agorans are not
even necessarily subscribed to a public forum, it seems quite possible
that a non-Agoran could join an Agoran contract yet be unaware of the
equity system, and
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 20:16 -0500, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I humbly request for a list of those obligations of mine that are public.
With respect to contracts, your obligations are to ensure that the AFO
obeys the Rules of Agora to the maximum possible extent, ensure that the
Left Hand obeys the
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 23:50 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 6:34 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still have a strong feeling that Agora needs some sort of safety valve
to escape from situations where
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I harvest 2159, 2160, 2163, and 2164, the ID numbers assigned to CFJs
in the past week, using four X crops as three 6s and one 5, to gain 8
WRVs.
Fails, timing (as you pointed out)
I transfer Zanzibar and 1 WRV to the
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
require a detailed knowledge of how it works.) As non-Agorans are not
even necessarily subscribed to a public forum, it seems quite possible
that a non-Agoran could join an Agoran
-- Forwarded message --
From: The Monster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Subject: [s-b] Operantly Conditioned Beast, are you there?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello. Sorry for sending this so publically and all, but I've been
trying to find your email
address
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the purposes of this message, Mr. Elbow is defined as an entity I
can act on behalf of by announcement.
Then Mr. Elbow must be yourself, since I am not aware of any other
entities you can act on behalf of by announcement.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
I call for judgement on the statement The Monster is a person.
Evidence:
Rule 2150:
{{{
A person is an entity that has the general capacity to be the
subject of rights and obligations under the rules.
}}}
Ooh, a classic faulty syllogism:
1. A
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
I call for judgement on the statement The Monster is a person.
Evidence:
Rule 2150:
{{{
A person is an entity that has the general capacity to be the
subject of rights and obligations
{{{
A person is an entity that has the general capacity to be
the subject of rights and obligations under the rules. }}}
I read the sentence as A
person is hereby defined to be an entity that has the general
capacity to be the subject of rights and obligations under the
rules.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under your style of parsing, a sentence like
Points are a currency. (R2179)
would be interpreted as 'Points' is defined to mean a currency.
No, this sentence is more analogous:
A point is an entity that is a
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooh, a classic faulty syllogism:
1. A person is an entity that is the subject of rights and
obligations under the rules.
2. The monster is an entity that is the subject of rights
(nb. not really) and obligations
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, comex wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under your style of parsing, a sentence like
Points are a currency. (R2179)
would be interpreted as 'Points' is defined to mean a currency.
No, this sentence is more analogous:
A
15 matches
Mail list logo
