This is invalid; apologies must be of at least 200 words (https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/#Rule2427 <https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/#Rule2427>)
Gaelan > On Aug 20, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I apologies for all wrongs or other cartable offenses I may have committed in > the execution of my offices, for which I have been issued a card. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Aug 16, 2017, at 11:37 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 13, 2017, at 11:42 PM, Aris Merchant >>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:39 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:15 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: >>>>> CoE grok is a player >>>> >>>> If only we could set up a standing order for this or something. >>>> The Referee should perhaps at least start giving out cards; a mistake >>>> in a report is excusable, making it that many times in a row isn't. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ais523 >>> >>> I point my finger at P.S.S. for violations of Rule 2143, which states >>> that: "A person SHALL NOT publish information that is inaccurate or >>> misleading while performing an official duty, or within a document >>> purporting to be part of any person or office's weekly or monthly >>> report." I recommend a sentence of yellow card. These errors, while >>> independently insignificant, together have a "a significant, though >>> small, impact on gameplay" (Rule 2427), if nothing else because >>> they're an annoying distraction. >> >> In light of P.S.S.’ own admission >> >> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:56 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> I accept this and publish the below corrected version. I apologize for this >>> error, but I have finally figured out how it has occurred. It seems that >>> when I made previous corrections, I failed to add them to the standing >>> file. This should not happen again. However, I still believe that I may be >>> deserving of a card. >> >> and the comprehensive argument presented by Aris, I issue Publius Scribonius >> Scholasticus a Yellow Card by Summary Judgement for violating Rule 2143. >> However, as it’s clear that P.S.S. has already taken steps to rectify the >> issue, I impose no specific set of words to be included in eir apology, >> should e choose to apologize. >> >> -o >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
