Re: DIS: Draft: [Proposal] Auctions

2017-10-27 Thread Nic Evans
Overall I like the bones of this. Notes sprinkled throughout. On 10/27/17 21:01, ATMunn wrote: > The draft of my long-awaited (not really) auctions proposal is finally > finished. > Here it is in all its glory (not really): > > Title: Auctions > Author: ATMunn > Co-Authors: (none) > AI: 2 > > In

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Award

2017-10-27 Thread Madeline
Look at whether there's a "Reply To" in the email header. If there is, clicking standard reply will send to that address (the mailing list usually puts a-d as a reply to on business and official messages). Otherwise, clicking reply will send only to the author of the replied-to message, and

DIS: Draft: [Proposal] Auctions

2017-10-27 Thread ATMunn
The draft of my long-awaited (not really) auctions proposal is finally finished. Here it is in all its glory (not really): Title: Auctions Author: ATMunn Co-Authors: (none) AI: 2 In this draft, numbers enclosed in square brackets (e.g. [1], [2], [3], etc.) indicate footnotes which are written

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Award

2017-10-27 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Interestingly for me, it works on a-b, but not a-o. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 27, 2017, at 9:59 PM, ATMunn wrote: > > Oops, Ntt...DF? > > For some reason, when replying to a-b or a-o threads, Thunderbird does

DIS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Award

2017-10-27 Thread ATMunn
Oops, Ntt...DF? For some reason, when replying to a-b or a-o threads, Thunderbird does not automatically send to a-d. I guess it's not that big of a deal. On 10/27/2017 9:57 PM, ATMunn wrote: Thanks! I think Gray is a pretty nice first ribbon. On 10/27/2017 9:02 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: For

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

2017-10-27 Thread Alexis Hunt
(In the case of a report like the Tailor's, scraping doesn't actually make sense, since it is only published monthly and easily kept up to date on a regular basis, so the website will frequently be more up to date Also, to new players, I highly encourage tracking your ribbons and claiming them

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

2017-10-27 Thread Alexis Hunt
That reminds me that I should put up the Tailor's report (incidentally, G., congratulations on getting a Transparent Ribbon you should have gotten but didn't due to a ratification as a result of an unrelated convergence). On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 at 20:57 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

2017-10-27 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Or someone who hosted a script that pushed reports to git on their computer. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Elsewhere-hosted bot? > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Reuben

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
Elsewhere-hosted bot? On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Reuben Staley wrote: > The site is powered by Github Pages, which only does static web pages, so it > would still be dependent on people (or at least one person) scraping the lists > manually. > > On 10/27/2017 4:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > >

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

2017-10-27 Thread Reuben Staley
The site is powered by Github Pages, which only does static web pages, so it would still be dependent on people (or at least one person) scraping the lists manually. On 10/27/2017 4:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: It occurs to me that the Officer sections on agoranomic.org, instead of depending

DIS: Officer report scraping

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
It occurs to me that the Officer sections on agoranomic.org, instead of depending on individuals posting their latest reports, could be auto-scraped from agora-official using the [Officer] tags? Rather than a single infrequently-updated report, this would lead to a directory of documents

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scroll of Agora

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 10/27/2017 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Could the subtitle be updated to something more informative? The other > badge descriptions all mention what happened and why it was awarded. > This description only says who it was awarded to. Sure. PSS as Herald awarded it and didn't officially

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scroll of Agora

2017-10-27 Thread ATMunn
I agree, as I had no idea what that was for until Aris posted. On 10/27/2017 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: = THE SCROLL OF AGORA

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scroll of Agora

2017-10-27 Thread Aris Merchant
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >= > THE SCROLL OF AGORA > === > Herald's Monthly Report >

Re: DIS: good FLR?

2017-10-27 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I believe the FLR that is currently online is accurate and it definitely includes all of the rules. On 10/27/2017 01:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I didn't follow all the corrections - is there a consensus as to what > recently-posted FLR draft is "most accurate" (needed for random picks > for

DIS: good FLR?

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
I didn't follow all the corrections - is there a consensus as to what recently-posted FLR draft is "most accurate" (needed for random picks for Fearmongor).

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Weekly Report

2017-10-27 Thread ATMunn
On 10/27/2017 1:47 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: Final question: When did Agora pay me 2 shinies? Oct 15th: PF Well, either way, I guess I also claim a reward of two shinies for authoring and pending a passed proposal. Did you miss this message?

Re: DIS: thesis thoughts

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Nothing prevents making multiple intents and only resolving one. > I'm an idiot. coming up...

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3580 assigned to G.

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 17:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Really, R1698 and R101 are the equivalent of "all your data will be lost, > > are you sure you want to proceed?" buttons. They make it hard to hide > > or accidentally make a game-ending proposal

Re: DIS: Let's talk Economic Realities

2017-10-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > > > On 10/25/17 16:30, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> Secondarily, I'd like to remove actions that require knowing the whole > >> gamestate (of those currencies) perfectly and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: humble agoran farmer loves halloween

2017-10-27 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 19:19 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > You are warned that this contains links, which will appear in the > distribution. According to my email client, no it doesn't. This may be a case of the plain text and HTML portions of the email differing. Normally, an HTML-portion link:

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3580 assigned to G.

2017-10-27 Thread Alex Smith
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 17:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Really, R1698 and R101 are the equivalent of "all your data will be lost, > are you sure you want to proceed?" buttons. They make it hard to hide > or accidentally make a game-ending proposal - but if an AI-3 majority > really wants to, they

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-27 Thread VJ Rada
Not pink-slippable: no personal gain. But it would certainly be illegal. And not really acceptable except for in extraordinary circumstances. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:05 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > That would be illegal and probably pink-slippable. And, it would be > not even a

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-27 Thread VJ Rada
That would be illegal and probably pink-slippable. And, it would be not even a report in the first place. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify. > > > On 10/27/2017

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-27 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify. On 10/27/2017 01:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Oct 23, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > >> -- >> >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

2017-10-27 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Thank you for the reminder, I missed that. On 10/26/2017 11:49 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> >> The other thing to note is that he was previously a player and continued >> to take

Re: DIS: Let's talk Economic Realities

2017-10-27 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > On 10/25/17 16:30, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> Secondarily, I'd like to remove actions that require knowing the whole >> gamestate (of those currencies) perfectly and fluctuates on a weekly >> basis: setting FV in particular.

Re: DIS: Let's talk Economic Realities

2017-10-27 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Secondarily, I'd like to remove actions that require knowing the whole > gamestate (of those currencies) perfectly and fluctuates on a weekly > basis: setting FV in particular. If "the value of everything" changes >

DIS: Re: BUS: A couple more actions

2017-10-27 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I flip my emotion to Joyous because I had a pretty good vacation and > feel properly refreshed. > > I pay Agora 5 shinies to create a Stamp. Welcome back! The stamp value is presently 6. -o signature.asc Description:

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

2017-10-27 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 2:02 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > # Recipient Gaelan PT[1] (registration order, earliest-to-latest) > - > 0 4 sh. 0 sh. > 1 PT[1]4 sh. 1 sh. > 10 PT[1]4 sh. 2 sh. > 13 PT[1]4 sh.

DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

2017-10-27 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 2:14 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> I cause Agora to make the following payments, which I believe can be >> uniquely decomposed into the individual payments required by “Passive