Overall I like the bones of this. Notes sprinkled throughout.
On 10/27/17 21:01, ATMunn wrote:
> The draft of my long-awaited (not really) auctions proposal is finally
> finished.
> Here it is in all its glory (not really):
>
> Title: Auctions
> Author: ATMunn
> Co-Authors: (none)
> AI: 2
>
> In
Look at whether there's a "Reply To" in the email header. If there is,
clicking standard reply will send to that address (the mailing list
usually puts a-d as a reply to on business and official messages).
Otherwise, clicking reply will send only to the author of the replied-to
message, and
The draft of my long-awaited (not really) auctions proposal is finally finished.
Here it is in all its glory (not really):
Title: Auctions
Author: ATMunn
Co-Authors: (none)
AI: 2
In this draft, numbers enclosed in square brackets (e.g. [1], [2], [3], etc.)
indicate footnotes which are written
Interestingly for me, it works on a-b, but not a-o.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 9:59 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> Oops, Ntt...DF?
>
> For some reason, when replying to a-b or a-o threads, Thunderbird does
Oops, Ntt...DF?
For some reason, when replying to a-b or a-o threads, Thunderbird does not
automatically send to a-d.
I guess it's not that big of a deal.
On 10/27/2017 9:57 PM, ATMunn wrote:
Thanks! I think Gray is a pretty nice first ribbon.
On 10/27/2017 9:02 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
For
(In the case of a report like the Tailor's, scraping doesn't actually make
sense, since it is only published monthly and easily kept up to date on a
regular basis, so the website will frequently be more up to date
Also, to new players, I highly encourage tracking your ribbons and claiming
them
That reminds me that I should put up the Tailor's report (incidentally, G.,
congratulations on getting a Transparent Ribbon you should have gotten but
didn't due to a ratification as a result of an unrelated convergence).
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 at 20:57 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
Or someone who hosted a script that pushed reports to git on their computer.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Elsewhere-hosted bot?
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Reuben
Elsewhere-hosted bot?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Reuben Staley wrote:
> The site is powered by Github Pages, which only does static web pages, so it
> would still be dependent on people (or at least one person) scraping the lists
> manually.
>
> On 10/27/2017 4:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
>
The site is powered by Github Pages, which only does static web pages,
so it would still be dependent on people (or at least one person)
scraping the lists manually.
On 10/27/2017 4:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It occurs to me that the Officer sections on agoranomic.org, instead
of depending
It occurs to me that the Officer sections on agoranomic.org, instead
of depending on individuals posting their latest reports, could be
auto-scraped from agora-official using the [Officer] tags? Rather
than a single infrequently-updated report, this would lead to a
directory of documents
On 10/27/2017 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Could the subtitle be updated to something more informative? The other
> badge descriptions all mention what happened and why it was awarded.
> This description only says who it was awarded to.
Sure. PSS as Herald awarded it and didn't officially
I agree, as I had no idea what that was for until Aris posted.
On 10/27/2017 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
=
THE SCROLL OF AGORA
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>=
> THE SCROLL OF AGORA
> ===
> Herald's Monthly Report
>
I believe the FLR that is currently online is accurate and it definitely
includes all of the rules.
On 10/27/2017 01:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I didn't follow all the corrections - is there a consensus as to what
> recently-posted FLR draft is "most accurate" (needed for random picks
> for
I didn't follow all the corrections - is there a consensus as to what
recently-posted FLR draft is "most accurate" (needed for random picks
for Fearmongor).
On 10/27/2017 1:47 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Final question: When did Agora pay me 2 shinies?
Oct 15th:
PF
Well, either way, I guess I also claim a reward of two shinies for authoring
and pending a passed proposal.
Did you miss this message?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> Nothing prevents making multiple intents and only resolving one.
>
I'm an idiot. coming up...
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 17:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Really, R1698 and R101 are the equivalent of "all your data will be lost,
> > are you sure you want to proceed?" buttons. They make it hard to hide
> > or accidentally make a game-ending proposal
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> >
> > On 10/25/17 16:30, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >> Secondarily, I'd like to remove actions that require knowing the whole
> >> gamestate (of those currencies) perfectly and
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 19:19 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> You are warned that this contains links, which will appear in the
> distribution.
According to my email client, no it doesn't.
This may be a case of the plain text and HTML portions of the email
differing. Normally, an HTML-portion link:
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 17:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Really, R1698 and R101 are the equivalent of "all your data will be lost,
> are you sure you want to proceed?" buttons. They make it hard to hide
> or accidentally make a game-ending proposal - but if an AI-3 majority
> really wants to, they
Not pink-slippable: no personal gain. But it would certainly be
illegal. And not really acceptable except for in extraordinary
circumstances.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:05 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> That would be illegal and probably pink-slippable. And, it would be
> not even a
That would be illegal and probably pink-slippable. And, it would be
not even a report in the first place.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify.
>
>
> On 10/27/2017
You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify.
On 10/27/2017 01:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
>> --
>>
>>
Thank you for the reminder, I missed that.
On 10/26/2017 11:49 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> wrote:
>>
>> The other thing to note is that he was previously a player and continued
>> to take
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> On 10/25/17 16:30, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> Secondarily, I'd like to remove actions that require knowing the whole
>> gamestate (of those currencies) perfectly and fluctuates on a weekly
>> basis: setting FV in particular.
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Secondarily, I'd like to remove actions that require knowing the whole
> gamestate (of those currencies) perfectly and fluctuates on a weekly
> basis: setting FV in particular. If "the value of everything" changes
>
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> I flip my emotion to Joyous because I had a pretty good vacation and
> feel properly refreshed.
>
> I pay Agora 5 shinies to create a Stamp.
Welcome back!
The stamp value is presently 6.
-o
signature.asc
Description:
> On Oct 27, 2017, at 2:02 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> # Recipient Gaelan PT[1] (registration order, earliest-to-latest)
> -
> 0 4 sh. 0 sh.
> 1 PT[1]4 sh. 1 sh.
> 10 PT[1]4 sh. 2 sh.
> 13 PT[1]4 sh.
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 2:14 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> I cause Agora to make the following payments, which I believe can be
>> uniquely decomposed into the individual payments required by “Passive
31 matches
Mail list logo