DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean rules
This needs to be done after the intent fixing proposal passes, anyway, since rule changes are explicitly _not_ fixed and this won't be in the ruleset that is being ratified. Greetings, Ørjan. On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, James Cook wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 00:59, James Cook wrote: I intend to clean Rule 2422 by changing "theresult" to "the result", without objection. I intend to clean Rule 2532 by changing "Call fo Judgement" to "Call for Judgement", without objection. Oops, I let that expire. I intend to clean Rule 2422 by changing "theresult" to "the result", without objection. I intend to clean Rule 2532 by changing "Call fo Judgement" to "Call for Judgement", without objection.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Contest wrap-up
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, Kerim Aydin wrote: Having achieved Agoran Consent', I do so. Consent' is the type of Consent that fails now, but willan on-succeed forewhen Proposal 8164 retrotakes pre-effect. I am not entirely sure this way of disclaiming doesn't cause it to wioll haven broke, since you are not entirely clearly doing something that would have succeeded if intent wasn't broken. Better to outright lie in the action part itself, me thinks. Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8165-8173
Sorry. I did see your original comment but completely forgot to get around to writing a revised proposal. -twg Original Message On 4 Mar 2019, 02:18, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > This is broken. As I pointed out in a previous comment on this proposal, > rule [2591](tel:2591) no longer contains this text. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Sun, 3 Mar [2019](tel:2019), Aris Merchant wrote: > >> // >> ID: [8169](tel:8169) >> Title: Spaceship Armour Defaults >> Adoption index: 1.0 >> Author: twg >> Co-authors: D Margaux, Telnaior >> >> >> Amend Rule [2591](tel:2591), "Spaceships", by replacing the following: >> >> * Armour (an integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10 >> inclusive). >> >> with: >> >> * Armour (an integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10 >> inclusive, defaulting to 10). >> >> Flip to 10 the Armour of each Spaceship that, at the time of the >> submission of this proposal, was: >> >> * in Sector 04 and owned by Baron von Vaderham, or; >> * in Sector 05 and owned by twg [previously Lost & Found], or; >> * in Sector 08 and owned by Falsifian, or; >> * in Sector 09 and owned by Telnaior, or; >> * in Sector 16 and owned by Telnaior [previously Lost & Found].
