On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 6:41 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 16:24 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:19 PM Rose Strong via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > I grant Aris a promise with the following text: "I Cuddlybanana
>
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 16:24 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-business
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:19 PM Rose Strong via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I grant Aris a promise with the following text: "I Cuddlybanana
> > transfer 1
> > Voting Card to Aris with the cashing condition
> > Aris has
On 6/6/21 7:45 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
For each of the following proposals, I submit it and pay one (1) pendant
to pend it. (These are my remaining protos from this year's RTRW.)
I count six proposals in this message, and only four pendants in your
possession. The last
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 3:21 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > the Promotor
>
> aren't you…
Well, yes, but if I make extra work for
Aris wrote:
I have some final notes. First, we need to
resolve the cultural dissonance between
a model that is built to accept paradoxes
and one that is built to avoid them. Note
that neither of these models suggest that
we should go around legislating in a way
that causes paradoxes. The
On 6/6/21 1:41 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> The Scroll for July 2018 was published on the fifteenth, eleven days
> before the patent title was awarded[6]. There was no Scroll in August
> 2018 and the September scroll was published by D. Margaux by
> deputization[7] and makes no mention
TL;DR: I found an untracked patent title.
Since people are eager to make use of their pendants at the moment, I
figured that I may as well get in a proposal idea that surfaced at the
beginning of May as Awards Month festivities were ending: a proposal
that would allow the Silver Quill to be
On 6/6/21 5:46 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: Gauntlet announcement patch
>>
>> Adoption index: 2.0
>>
>> Author: Jason
>>
>> Coauthors:
On 6/6/21 5:36 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2021, at 9:17 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> Amend rule 1950 by appending the following to the first paragraph: " If
>> a referendum has an adoption index less than the adoption index of its
>>
On 6/6/2021 3:04 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Jun 5, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> CFJ, barring Gaelan: For the purposes of R2553, CFJ 3907 is about the
>> effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a change in the gamestate.
>
> The
> On Jun 5, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> the Promotor
aren't you…
> On Jun 5, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal.
>
> -Aris
> ---
> Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing
> Adoption index: 1.7
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors:
>
>
> [Note that Gaelan's win should have been processed by the time
> this
> On Jun 5, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> CFJ, barring Gaelan: For the purposes of R2553, CFJ 3907 is about the
> effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a change in the gamestate.
The fact that I violated the rules has a direct impact on the
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal:
>
> Title: Gauntlet announcement patch
>
> Adoption index: 2.0
>
> Author: Jason
>
> Coauthors:
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule 2644 (The Gauntlet) to read, in whole:
>
> {
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 1:28 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> Title: Emergency Regulation Clarification
The proposal seems fine, ofc, but this reminds me: do we even want
emergency regulations? They just seem like a huge pile of very
flammable scam fuel (as G. et all so helpfully
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 9:17 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> Amend rule 1950 by appending the following to the first paragraph: " If
> a referendum has an adoption index less than the adoption index of its
> associated proposal, the referendum's adoption index is immediately set
16 matches
Mail list logo
