There's been some comments lately on the degree of difficulty of some
offices, notably Treasuror, and it's definitely of note that twg proposed
to maintain the Glitter rewards in eir report.
But it strikes me as odd that the rewards are largely the province of
individual players, since it puts a
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 17:10, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Alexis wrote:
> > The only difference is the expectation that the officer, before
> publishing
> > the report, verify that no messages have been sent that would alter the
> > contents
Here's some outline I was thinking to move us towards a more pragmatic
model of law:
Any question that arises as part of a dispute can be categorized into one
of the following:
- Question of fact, divided into:
- Questions of natural fact, being facts which are true without reference
to the
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:35, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/13/20 5:58 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I agree that it would be good to have some way of giving officers extra
> > votes on relevant proposals - this was also
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 00:38, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This doesn’t really do all that much—default voting strength is 3 and max
> is 5, so it’s a little under a double vote. Maybe we need to increase the
> range of allowed voting strengths?
>
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 19:05, Aris Merchant via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
> >
> > The below CFJ is 3792. I assign it to G.
> >
> > status:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 18:12, Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > Notice of Honour:
> > -1 Karma to Jason Cobb for calling a CFJ on eir own scam and presenting
> no
> > arguments about the most critical aspects of eir case.
> > +1 Karma to omd for the
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 11:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> Like with [Proposal], please put/edit [CFJ] into subject lines
> when you call a CFJ, if you think about it :).
>
I can appreciate the use of this, but changing subject lines always leaves
me
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 01:25, James Cook wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 06:13, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 01:07, James Cook wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 06:05, James Cook wrote:
> >> > However, the use of the word "it" in the text "but already owned it"
> >> >
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 01:07, James Cook wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 06:05, James Cook wrote:
> > However, the use of the word "it" in the text "but already owned it"
> > in R2602 indicates to me that the text of the rule is written with the
> > point of view that there's only one of each
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 14:38, Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> I recuse omd from CFJ 3783 (I know you put forward some preliminary
> thoughts on the case omd, which is why I waited a bit, but it's been a
> long time on this case now).
>
> I assign CFJ
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 21:30, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
>
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 14:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/11/2020 10:53 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> >> since
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 13:25, Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I suppose. I was considering keeping them to try to bribe people, but
> since they're pretty useless, that would be pointless. I perform the
> following action 18 times: { If I have more than
Well, the current contracts rules are very broken. But that's ok! :P
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:21, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> TBH, there's no real reason to disallow 1-member contracts. It doesn't
> make sense under real world contract law, but
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:07, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Neither your votes, nor the promotor report, were to the public forum.
>
> Additionally, I ask that you reconsider your vote on 8281. I don’t have a
> force-through scam up my sleeve, and I
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 14:51, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:59 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m intrigued by the idea. I’m a little concerned that it’s TOO
> vague—are these rulings CFJ-like (a
On Tue., Jan. 7, 2020, 23:34 Aris Merchant via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 8280 Murphy, Jason Cobb 3.0 Resolve the troubles v1.1
>
AGAINST
> 8281 Gaelan 1.0 Nothing to see here, Rule 1030 v2
>
AGAINST
> 8282 Falsifian
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 18:12, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:00 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > This gets me thinking of a potential big and maybe-interesting-maybe-not
> > big chang
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 16:13, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:56 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > Would anyone complain/object if I ratified a "false" Herald's Report
> > that claims the Notices of Honor
On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> CFJ: "Alexis is a player."
>
Gratuitous: I agree with twg's arguments.
201 - 221 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
