I'd like to add: I'm registering with the nickname Arkady.
On 18 July 2011 22:01, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 23:14 +0100, Arkady English wrote:
Dear Agorans:
I intend to join the game at this time in accordance with rule 869.
Also, agoranomic.org
Is there a game-mechanical difference between support and weakly
support? Or does this simply indicate that omd may be willing to change eir
mind?
On 19 July 2011 18:01, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
On Mon,
Gah. I may have got mixed up between 2nd class person and person.
Thought it was too obvious.
On 22 July 2011 11:42, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:00, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
I announce that I deregister the President
, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
The term Secured is not defined anywhere in the rules, hence I argue it
hasn't really got any legal meaning
It's defined in Rule 1688 (as the verb secures).
Nevertheless, I transfer all my points to Arkady for thinking like an
Agoran
I support
On 25 July 2011 01:46, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 24 July 2011 23:17, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
GUILTY / EXILE.
Uh...
I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgement.
On 25 July 2011 13:18, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
I support
On 25 July 2011 01:46, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 24 July 2011 23:17, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
GUILTY / EXILE.
Uh...
I intend, with two support, to appeal
Does Agora have any jurisdiction over a laptop repair shop? How would
they respond if we (or rather, the speaker, on behalf of the
President, on behalf of Agora) mailed them a letter fining them, say,
10 points?
Can we try this?
On 8 August 2011 16:52, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
On 9 August 2011 15:50, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
the number of First-Class players of Agora:
Conditions: The casher, on cashing this promise, creates
On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
the number of First-Class players of Agora:
Conditions: The casher
On 9 August 2011 16:11, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2011 10:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
I create a number
On 11 August 2011 06:04, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2011 11:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:41, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2011 11:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I destroy my copy of this Promise.
I'm not sure this actually
On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
On 11 August 2011 20:51, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I support any attempts to flip the speed to normal, and object to any
attempts to flip the speed to slow.
I object to both attempts to flip the speed.
On 6 October 2011 07:34, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Wooble wrote:
I request and require cakes, ale, and registration.
I fine Wooble 5 points for not wearing a sword.
Would you care to direct us to the rule requiring Wooble to wear a sword?
In addition, ey may well be wearing a
Ahem...to the proper person this time:
I submit the following proposal to the promotor:
In order to demonstrate their committment to justice, all standing judges are
required to wear a sword at all times. Any player required to wear a sword
found
not to be wearing a sword may be given an on
On 17 October 2011 17:01, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:09, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
As UTC Midnight, this week, the proposal pool has the following:
What is this i don't even.
7126: Cambridge Bye-Law
In order
On 18 October 2011 16:35, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/17/2011 11:07 PM, woggle wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
[I will resolve at most one of the above intents.]
- woggle
On 20 October 2011 11:48, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I've noticed we're missing an invasion protection rule at the moment.
Given that due to events elsewhere, it seems that an invasion may well
be imminent, I submit the following proposal (Title=Invasion
protection, AI=2, Ordinary):
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
I nominate myself as Promotor.
--
Wooble
I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do that? I can't remember
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
I nominate myself as Promotor
On 20 October 2011 13:20, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
On 24 October 2011 03:27, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I support and do so, nominating omd.
I accept.
Wait - I ended up as Rulekeepor too... I missed that :-S
(I need to pay more attention to what goes on here,
On 27 October 2011 23:16, Josiah Worcester josi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
For the duration of this message, I am deputizing for Promotor.
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of
On 6 November 2011 22:24, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 17:22 -0500, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I create a Promise with the following text, and then cash it: {{I cash
this Promise. This
On 8 November 2011 07:10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Considered it's only to be used when there's something buggy which
would probably be fixed when caught, a good
On 29 November 2011 22:33, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
On 11/28/2011 07:20 PM, omd wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com
wrote:
I intend (with 2 support) to request reconsideration. Especially in
light of CFJ 3126, X
On 12 December 2011 07:46, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend, without objection, to transfer rule 2166 from the Lost and
Found department to myself.
(This works because rules fulfil the definition of assets; they exist
only because they're rules-defined (their backing document is
On 9 January 2012 23:59, Ben Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gratuitous counter argument, possibly erroneous:
I seem to recall that Agoran precedent allows non-players to submit CFJs
without affecting their player (or non-player) status.
OscarMeyr
I think this is not so much
On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
{
Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is
either none (default) or an integral multiple
On 17 January 2012 23:39, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/17/2012 05:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
On 15 January 2012 15:24, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:15 AM, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
On 19 September 2012 14:03, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to determine the new Air Traffic
Controller. For this
decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class players, the vote
collector is the IADoP, and the valid options are FKA441344 and
On 20 September 2012 02:50, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
I spend a ruble
To do what?
To increase my voting limit on the quoted proposal.
I CFJ the following:
{{{
The following sentence:
I spend a ruble
On 20 September 2012 15:54, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
The following sentence:
I spend a ruble and vote *V* under the conditions that:
- the above sentence is obviously related to a proposal, *P
On 24 September 2012 14:53, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: You are inactive, and therefore not an eligible voter on this decision.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 September 2012 14:28, Arkady English
arkadyenglish+ag
On 25 September 2012 17:27, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Two-way Plutocracy (AI=2)
Amend Rule 2375 (Plutocratic Chamber) by replacing:
Any entity may spend a Ruble to increase an entity's voting
limit on a Plutocratic Decision by 1.
with:
Any entity may
On 26 September 2012 08:04, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I intend, with notice, to cause the rule entitled Win by Junta to amend
itself by appending scshunt CAN cause this rule to make arbitrary changes,
including Rule Changes, to the gamestate by announcement, and CAN cause a
On 27 September 2012 02:23, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Clerk's Docket
Date of this report: Thu 26 Sep 12
Date of last report: Thu 23 Aug 12
(All times are UTC)
Unqualified (Rule 1868)
---
All of these players are supine, except as noted.
Hi everyone:
One player has dropped out, and as such I have two spaces free for a game
of Dipnomicy: https://sites.google.com/site/dipnomicy/game-information
There have been no moves made yet and I would be willing to grant a little
time for new players (or player - we can go with one empty
On 10 October 2012 19:30, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
what is pending to resolve the current state? Action from Murphy?
something else?
And just to get going, I'd like to run a contest (no question that
contests still work, right?)
Two ideas, whichever gets the most
On 11 October 2012 16:52, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:50 AM, Arkady English wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but what
40 matches
Mail list logo
