On Sunday 16 September 2007 18:35:19 comex wrote:
You missed the clause without objection, which means that any player
can object to the attempted inactivity flip within four days before it
actually takes effect.
Indeed, you're right that I missed that clause. I hereby withdraw my
proposals,
On Monday 17 September 2007 09:47:33 Ian Kelly wrote:
On 9/16/07, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agora,
Josiah pikhq Worcester, hailing from a pre-Nomic land, would
like to
register as a first-class player, effective immediately.
Sincerely, Josiah
Welcome to Agora! Do you
Thank you for pointing out the many problems in my proposals. It's
great that you recorded them, but, unfortunately for you, I've
already withdrawn them (thanks to some of the other bugs in it).
pikhq
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:05:21 Ed Murphy wrote:
I cause the AFO to publish the following.
You can't do that, having both deregistered and left the AFO. . .
Wait, never mind. You've not left the AFO, merely Human Point Two.
Peekee and pikhq belonged to the Gray Party.
Wrong. By Rule
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:32:31 Ed Murphy wrote:
Primarily so I could do the following.
I call for judgement on the following statements, and request linked
assignments:
Out of *immense* curiosity, is there anything in the rules that says
that a non-player may call for judgement? I
On Thursday 04 October 2007 02:09:02 Ed Murphy wrote:
The AFO nominates Levi, Peekee, and pikhq for Ambassador, Herald,
and IADoP.
(For each combination of nominee and office, this is an Agoran
decision on whether to approve installing that nominee to that
office, with Agoran consent and
On Sunday 07 October 2007 16:26:07 comex wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I vote SUPPORT on proposals 5246 through 5253.
I CFJ on the following:
pikhq voted FOR a proposal on or about Sun, 7 Oct 2007
16:19:46 -0600.
I vote FOR those proposals, making the CFJ
On Sunday 21 October 2007 09:09:51 comex wrote:
I consent and intend to judge REMAND, with the arguments posted a
while
back.
Care to do so in a public forum?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 21 October 2007 10:28:35 Zefram wrote:
I still don't like retroactivity.
It seems to me that the retroactivity would be useful *if* someone
genuinely screws up. . .
CFJ 1711 was about correcting a mandatory publication; in that case
the initial incorrect posting inherently did not
On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:03:13 Taral wrote:
Having received the consent of the members,
comex's consent was not given in a public forum, thus it was not an
actual game action. Therefore, you have *not* received the consent of
all members. If you disagree, please, call a CFJ. ;)
On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:38:27 comex wrote:
I support OVERRULE, replacing with Eris's original judgement of
FALSE.
-root
I support this.
I still think that AFFIRM is the correct option, but honestly, it
doesn't matter that much. . . This has been a few weeks of argument
On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:44:22 comex wrote:
Then support the OVERRULE and cause the panel to judge so...
I'm not on the panel, I'm merely opining.
On Sunday 21 October 2007 16:56:38 comex wrote:
If you want to set a record, have the Pineapple Partnership call a
CFJ,
assign it to yourself, and judge it all in the same message.
I suggest calling a CFJ on This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran
history.. ;)
On Sunday 21 October 2007 17:06:38 Zefram wrote:
Josiah Worcester wrote:
I suggest calling a CFJ on This CFJ is the shortest one in Agoran
history.. ;)
It would only end up being appealed.
-zefram
So assign yourself, amending that this is also the shortest *appeal*
ever. ;)
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 16:31:46 Ian Kelly wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1764
Noting this, I find that FOR and SUPPORT are, in fact, synonyms, and
I judge TRUE accordingly.
-root
I would just like to note that, conveniently, there is no change in
On Friday 26 October 2007 23:59:52 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Frankly, such an officer should be removed from office and perhaps
penalized for breaking the rule mandating eir reports. Just because
y'all (and me) are nice enough not to do so for an unimportant
office doesn't mean that it's not the
On Friday 26 October 2007 23:23:52 Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend to make myself Herald, with Agoran Consent.
I support this *and* consent to this.
On Thursday 04 October 2007 09:33:13 Ian Kelly wrote:
On 10/4/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The AFO nominates Levi, Peekee, and pikhq for Ambassador, Herald,
and IADoP.
Grr. We *do* have a new herald.
I hereby retract my support for the current herald vote; sorry.
On Saturday 27 October 2007 00:05:25 Josiah Worcester wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007 23:23:52 Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend to make myself Herald, with Agoran Consent.
I support this *and* consent to this.
Gack. Not in a public forum. Since I'm retracting that anyways,
doesn't change
On Saturday 27 October 2007 00:38:47 Ed Murphy wrote:
I nominate Goethe, pikhq, and root for Notary.
I do not consent to my nomination.
I SUPPORT root and Goethe.
I vote AGAINST myself.
If I'm having trouble keeping my CFJs up-to-date, how am I supposed to
handle even a simple office,
On Saturday 27 October 2007 06:53:02 Zefram wrote:
NUM FL AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5269 O1 1pikhq none
I retract this proposal.
On Saturday 27 October 2007 02:03:51 Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
5261 AGAINST x 5
5262 PRESENT
5263 AGAINST
5264 AGAINST x 5
5265 AGAINST
5266 AGAINST
5267 AGAINST
5268 AGAINST
You're not an eligible voter on any of these.
-zefram
He registered 5 minutes previous, making him a
On Sunday 28 October 2007 10:57:25 Zefram wrote:
pikhq's proposal remains in the proposal pool. pikhq has the option
to withdraw it. If not withdrawn, it will be distributed in the
next batch (on Wednesday).
-zefram
I withdraw my proposal.
On Sunday 28 October 2007 16:09:39 comex wrote:
On behalf of the AFO:
The AFO hereby initiates 10,000 inquiry cases, barring Zefram, for
the
statement:
- This is Sparta
I make the following proposal:
Create a rule named Judicial abuse, with power 1.4, with the
following text:
A player
On Sunday 28 October 2007 10:57:25 Zefram wrote:
I wrote:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}
{}{
Proposal 5269 (Ordinary, AI=1, Interest=1) by pikhq
none
I make the following proposal:
Amend rule 1922 by adding the following text to the end:
(e)
If all ten thousand CFJs referred to as Sparta-Sparta in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exist, then I spend 2500 blue VCs
to make Zefram gain 1250 blue VCs.
On Sunday 04 November 2007 16:50:34 comex wrote:
I KNEW that allowing the CotC discretion over linked assignments was
a bad idea! g
I think not. It eliminated one of your attempts at spamming the
courts. :)
On Sunday 04 November 2007 17:02:35 comex wrote:
Perhaps, but Zefram could have easily have kept the VCs. Honestly
it seems contrary to the spirit of Agora that he didn't.
Perhaps Zefram keeps his word even outside of the public forum? :p
On Monday 05 November 2007 10:54:24 comex wrote:
On 11/5/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby assign pikhq as judge of CFJ 1784.
You're a very efficient CotC. Nevertheless...
I nominate AFO, Pineapple Partnership, Human Point Two, myself, and
Goethe for the office of CotC.
I
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 18:04:53 Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Given that B and Agora are rattling their rulesets, what do we want
to do should the situation devolve into open warfare?
One thing we could do is attempt to become protector of B. Upon a
cursory view of the B rules, any Agora
On Thursday 15 November 2007 19:37:23 comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to join the AFO, with SUPPORT of all AFO members.
Judge CFJ 1783 already!
I judge comex GUILTY in the CFJ 1783, with the initiator's arguments.
On Thursday 15 November 2007 18:19:05 comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 18:04:53 Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Given that B and Agora are rattling their rulesets, what do we
want
to do should the situation devolve into open warfare
On Thursday 15 November 2007 20:16:20 Levi Stephen wrote:
comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
At the time, I was thinking that it could be useful in a scam against B
Nomic. It would no longer be necessary to be in the AFO, but anyways. .
. I would create
On Thursday 15 November 2007 20:12:04 comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
At the time, I was thinking that it could be useful in a scam against B
Nomic. It would no longer be necessary to be in the AFO, but anyways. .
. I would create several factions with me
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:09:30 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 8:01 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction, with Agoran
support,
under the B Nomic name Agoran Embassy (and spying organisation). Why?
Just to put
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:17:02 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 10:13 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? An embassy is quite different from an ambassador. ;)
Seeking to establish an embassy implies that you are an ambassador.
-root
The rules do not say that.
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:48:00 Kerim Aydin wrote:
Could flooding work against Agora in its current state?
It might be worth it to write a quick and dirty defensive proposal
to get it distributed quickly. It's probably an overreaction but we
can always vote it down.
Well, yeah.
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:56:26 Levi Stephen wrote:
Was that this one:
With 2 SUPPORT, any player may be forcibly deregistered. This support may
only come from first-class players that existed November 12, 2007.
Levi
I retracted that and added Only players that joined after
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:44:22 Ed Murphy wrote:
Wed 14 Nov 03:56:30 Bake The Traitor created, contestmaster Murphy
(contesthood disputed, treats comex differently
from other potential contestants)
Wed 14 Nov 11:29:49 Zefram joins Bake
On Saturday 17 November 2007 16:58:50 comex wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 6:33 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I nominate pikhq and Wooble for Scorekeepor.
I nominate comex for Scorekeepor. I consent to be Scorekeepor.
I vote against comex as Scorekeepor.
On Saturday 17 November 2007 19:34:21 Taral wrote:
On 11/17/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call for appeal of Murphy's latest judgement in CFJ 1787, and suggest at
this point REASSIGN. CotC, please consider the preceding paragraph to be
my
Appellant's arguments.
I support
On Saturday 17 November 2007 19:54:12 comex wrote:
On Saturday 17 November 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I call for appeal of Murphy's latest judgement in CFJ 1787, and suggest
at this point REASSIGN. CotC, please consider the preceding paragraph
to be my Appellant's arguments.
I object!
On Saturday 17 November 2007 22:11:45 Ian Kelly wrote:
With the panel's agreement, I cause the panel to judge SUSTAIN in the
matter of CFJ 1777a:
This does not seem incoherent or unrelated to me. The judge accepts
the initiator's arguments as a reasonable and preferable
On Sunday 18 November 2007 10:59:14 Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I submit the following proposal, entitled Protective Alliance and
set its AI to 4.
{{
Whereas Agora faces grave danger from devious external forces, and is
in dire need of protection,
Agora submits to Nomicapolis as its benevolent
It seems to me that CFJ1799 is actually about an *unregulated* action (by rule
2125). By rule 101, every player has the right to perform unregulated
actions. Thus, this CFJ should *probably* be judged either IRRELEVANT or
TRUE.
This case, however, seems to come down to the permissibility of an
On Sunday 18 November 2007 12:17:26 Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: Voting debits and refraction
(AI = 2, please)
Create a rule titled Voting Debits with Power 2 and this text:
Voting Debits (VDs) are a class of fixed assets. VDs CANNOT
be affected except as defined by this
On Sunday 18 November 2007 18:24:35 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
The recordkeeporship of VCs being split amongst these different offices
just
makes VCs far too tricky to handle. Just leave it all with the Accountor.
Also, why does the Accountor keep track of all VDs, but not all VCs?
On Sunday 18 November 2007 19:37:18 comex wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
I CFJ on the following statements, requesting linked assignment, barring
pikhq.
Gratuitous arguments:
http://cfj.qoid.us/1722
http://cfj.qoid.us/1714
I note that support may reasonably be
On Monday 19 November 2007 16:55:26 Zefram wrote:
H. pikhq, I hereby inform you of criminal case 1804 in which you are
the defendant, and invite you to rebut the argument for your guilt.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1804
== CFJ 1804
On Monday 19 November 2007 17:58:25 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007 5:44 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I implore the judge to act in the best interests of the game. I note that
a
charge for a judgement may well be a write of FAGE.
Finally, should this CFJ be judged
On Monday 19 November 2007 18:36:42 comex wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
Finally, should this CFJ be judged with me as GUILTY, I intend to create
criminal CFJs against every judge whose opinion was overruled on appeal.
There are only four, including yours
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 12:05:30 Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
As a concurring opinion, I note that pikhq did not wait the requisite
96 hours before attempting to resolve the decision, so this would have
been FALSE even if e had correctly specified the
On Thursday 22 November 2007 16:48:04 Roger Hicks wrote:
I nominate Fookiemyartug for the office of Scorekeeper.
Fookiemyartug consents to this nomination.
I SUPPORT this nomination
BobTHJ
I nominate the AFO for the office of Scorekeepor.
On Thursday 22 November 2007 17:54:12 comex wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 7:37 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, just because I can:
I SUPPORT the AFO for Scorekeepor.
The AFO SUPPORTs the AFO for Scorekeepor.
I OBJECT to Fookiemyartug as Scorekeepor.
The AFO OBJECTS
On Thursday 22 November 2007 20:04:46 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
Fine. I spend 2B VCs to create 200B marks. I spend 1K VC to create 100K
marks.
These don't work, either. The Marks rule only allows you to convert
Marks to VCs voluntarily; to convert VCs to Marks, you have to arrange
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:52:34 Ed Murphy wrote:
comex wrote:
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
This was successful.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to pikhq.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Murphy.
The AFO transfers 98
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:57:57 comex wrote:
If everyone's VLOP is to be 4, why not just:
Proto: Repeal Ordinary Proposals
{{{
Repeal Rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Proposals).
Amend Rule 106 by removing the text:
A Proposal with an Adoption Index of less than 2 is Ordinary. All
other
On Friday 23 November 2007 20:05:27 Roger Hicks wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007 6:03 PM, Levi Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I initiate an Agoran Decision to resolve the holder of the Scorekeeper
office.
The valid options are WOOBLE, PIKHQ, COMEX and FOOKIEMYARTUG.
The eligible voters are
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:14:48 Ed Murphy wrote:
I nominate pikhq and Wooble for Ambassador.
Levi, any luck with the reports for IADoP and/or Herald?
I consent to be Ambassador.
I SUPPORT myself as Ambassador.
The AFO SUPPORTS myself as Ambassador.
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:11:14 Ed Murphy wrote:
Goethe wrote:
People outside the conspiracy: can we be done with currencies again
for a while? Zefram, care to do the honors of proposing?
We might want to just repeal VCs and Marks, while leaving the Asset
infrastructure in place
On Friday 23 November 2007 14:42:47 Kerim Aydin wrote:
It is clear that the era of partnerships and contracts has degenerated
into an era of petty abuse. So it has run its course. Sad, even by Agoran
standards. Anyone (eris, root?) want to make the move now to get rid of
them, and
On Friday 23 November 2007 13:14:58 comex wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007 3:00 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The AFO calls for judgement on the following:
- There are now elephants over there
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex
I consent to being Bankor of the following contract.
1) The name of this contract is The National Bank of Agora.
2) At any given time, exactly one member of this contract is the Bankor. The
Bankor may transfer this position to any consenting member.
3) A person MAY join this contract by
On Friday 23 November 2007 16:17:17 comex wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007 6:04 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to BobTHJ.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Eris.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Goethe.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to OscarMeyr.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to
On Thursday 22 November 2007 23:31:56 Roger Hicks wrote:
Decision: I intend with Agoran Consent to unconditionally surrender to B
Nomic.
Options: SUPPORT, OBJECT
SUPPORT: comex, OscarMeyr
OBJECT: Zefram, Levi
The option selected by Agora is: SUPPORT
I hereby unconditionally
On Friday 23 November 2007 11:31:00 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
[ Any problems with this, rules-wise? Sure hope not. ]
Afraid so. The contract would need Power = 2 to alter VC holdings
(Rules 1688 and 2126).
I tried having the Agoran Credit Union work around this by defining
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:41:55 Ed Murphy wrote:
The AFO retracts all CFJs that it called within the past 24 hours.
Fortunately, the marks are still in existence. :)
On Friday 23 November 2007 16:04:30 Ed Murphy wrote:
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to BobTHJ.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Eris.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Goethe.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to OscarMeyr.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to Peekee.
I transfer 409 Blue Marks to root.
I transfer 409
On Friday 23 November 2007 17:58:31 Josiah Worcester wrote:
'104.' The Speaker for the first game shall be Michael Norrish.
Agora's Child may do nothing.
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:09:34 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007 11:58 AM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to use Tue and/or Yoyo for any further discussion about this
contract.
Since sub-nomics tend to generate a lot of messages, I would
appreciate it if you
On Saturday 24 November 2007 12:53:48 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007 1:15 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assumed that nobody would mind me using the backup forum, which is not
actually *used*. . . But, at your behest, I think I'll find a new forum
for
this Nomic
On Saturday 24 November 2007 13:34:43 Nick Vanderweit wrote:
Hello, all. I am a friend of pikhq, and he recently introduced me to
the world of Agora nomic. I've been reading the mailing lists for a
week or so, and it all sounds very interesting. So, I'd like to
register as a first-class
On Saturday 24 November 2007 14:11:40 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
Mi voyagxas al Esperanto.
Que?
I voyage to Esperanto. This is an unregulated action; however, by rule 2105,
this is a valid Agoran location.
On Saturday 24 November 2007 15:41:31 comex wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007 4:35 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agora hereby requests to become a player in B Nomic.
Faction :D
Sure. It also counts as a faction. :D
On Saturday 24 November 2007 15:56:05 Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I assumed that nobody would mind me using the backup forum, which is not
actually *used*. . . But, at your behest, I think I'll find a new forum
for
this Nomic. . .
The old
On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
1804. The time limit for assignment runs out in nearly 24 hours, so 48
hours after my declaration of intent, I
On Sunday 25 November 2007 14:15:05 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise to publish this report (if there are any errors,
let me know):
I believe I hold the title Sorceror's Apprentice per Proposal 5262.
That is not a currently-defined
On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:14:53 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
1804. The time limit for assignment runs out
On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:26:28 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
Finally, if my above deputisation goes through, I intend to nominate
Murphy as CotC.
You don't need to do that dependently.
I don't want the nomination to occur until I deputise
On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:17:37 Josiah Worcester wrote:
This initiates the voting period on proposal 305.
305. Rule 304 shall be amended so that the sentence saying The First
Ambassador and the Second Ambassador may act on behalf of Agora's Child to
satisfy such obligations
On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:26:09 Ed Murphy wrote:
Proposal: Do we still need this?
(AI = 2, please)
Repeal Rule 1450 (Separation of Powers).
Since we still *have* an Assesor and a Promotor, I'd say the rule is still
relevant. This, of course, does not say whether or not its needed. ;)
On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:36:48 Ed Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Marks for one-time VLOP
Amend the rule Marks by appending this text to the list of ways to
spend Marks:
b) A player may spend 10 Marks in each of N+1 different colors
to increase another player's voting
On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:27:37 Ed Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: The Accountor
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2137 (The Assessor) to read:
The Assessor is an office; its holder is responsible for
collecting votes on proposals.
Create a rule titled The Accountor with
On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:07:15 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote (in the Agora's Child forum):
I retract No decay!, and submit the following proposal (also titled No
decay!):
Adoption index = 2
Interest index = 2
Co-author is avpx
In rule 2126:
* Remove monthly decay
*
On Sunday 25 November 2007 18:15:44 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
The AFO consents to be contest-master of all of these contests.
These are not contests if you read the recent voting results; you'd need to
make them dependently, although I think my silly
On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:10:26 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I create a contest which is a private dependent contract.
Not to be rude but read the voting results. Specifically, to make a
dependent contract you have to make the contract without 2
On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:16:55 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:10:26 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I create a contest which is a private dependent contract.
Not to be rude
On Sunday 25 November 2007 22:21:23 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 2:12 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Minister Without Portfolio, held by
Human Point Two, Murphy, root, Eris
Above won before Minister Without Portfolio, so no win-date recorded.
root (Nov
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 09:17:55 Zefram wrote:
I hereby recuse pikhq from CFJ 1783. I hereby assign OscarMeyr as judge
of CFJ 1783.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1783
== CFJ 1783 ==
Type:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 17:10:23 Zefram wrote:
Josiah Worcester wrote:
You cannot recuse. I sentenced him to APOLOGY. This case is already closed.
As I indicated at the time, APOLOGY alone is not a valid sentence.
APOLOGY must be accompanied by a set of prescribed words. The empty set
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 18:03:47 comex wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I would like to encourage everyone to vote against my first, somewhat
malformed proposal entitled No decay! (5323) So, I will grant 100 blue
marks to all who vote against it (regardless
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 18:15:36 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 5:49 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the defendant honestly believed that the judgement that e assigned
was appropriate, I think e should be EXCUSED. Under the recent rule
change, e could also be found
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 19:22:25 Levi Stephen wrote:
I resolve the decision on the holder of the Scorekeepor office:
The votes are as follows
WOOBLE:
PIKHQ: pikhq, Murphy, AFO, root, zefram
COMEX: Wooble
FOOKIEMYARTUG: BobTHJ, Fookiemyartug, OscarMeyr
The option selected by
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 19:59:26 Levi Stephen wrote:
Might be invalid, because you misspelled decrease
Hmmm... is 'decreating' the AFO's VVLOP regulated? Might be a criminal
CFJ :P
Lev
LMAO.
In my defense: I thought I was decreasing it. ;)
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 19:53:35 Ian Kelly wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 7:49 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Invalid, since you didn't specify a color.
Color of what? If I have to specify one color to spend VCs of one
color, and two colors to spend VCs of two different colors
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 20:14:41 Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 9:25 PM, comex wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 9:22 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
The CotC web page has gratuitous arguments by pikhq of a sentence to
APOLOGY. Am I correct that
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 20:23:56 Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 10:18 PM, Josiah Worcester wrote:
Have fun with it.
Random grab-bag of words:
死ぬ
die
ころす
kill
人肉
human meat
食べる
eat
何
what
する
to do
日本語
Japanese (language)
;)
;)
Eigo de hanashite
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 22:08:21 Michael Norrish wrote:
My Mac is doing a great job of rendering the Japanese; I was very
pleasantly surprised to find it, Emacs and Thunderbird all coping so
well.
Michael.
Now, H. First Speaker, can you *read* it?
On Thursday 29 November 2007 17:40:07 Ed Murphy wrote:
pikhq wrote:
5320 O1 1pikhq Non-reporting Office
Thanks to recent VVLOP increases, I vote FOR this twice more.
This doesn't work. These increases will only affect your voting limit
starting with proposals distributed
On Thursday 29 November 2007 22:06:16 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
I Withdraw Proposal 195.
I Revise Proposal 191 to read as follows:
{
At the bottom of Rule 3-8 (Calendar), add a sub-heading called Public
Holidays.
In Rule 3-8, under the sub-heading Public Holidays, add the following
text:
{
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
