On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> === CFJ 2888 (Interest Index = 0)
>
>> Judge: Tanner L. Swett
>
> CoE, accepted: this was ineffective, Tanner was supine (I hadn't
> yet updated the DB to be aware of it).
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> CFJ, disqualifying Tanner L. Swett: In the message quoted in
> evidence, Tanner L. Swett gained at least one erg.
I don't think you've assigned this CFJ yet. Do you intend to?
—Tanner L. Swett
2010/10/11 :
> That statement still depends on its own truth value, just indirectly.
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of the following string (expect with the
number 3000 incremented), followed by a quotation mark, followed by
the sam
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:22 PM, omd wrote:
> Maybe all recursive statements should just be considered
> indeterminate, regardless of how they would come out if we attempted
> to break them apart?
Due to Rule 2215, it would be illegal for me to make an unqualified
public statement consisting of th
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, John Smith wrote:
> CfJ:The second NoV quoted below is not valid
>
> Arguments: According to Rule 2230, "A NoV is valid if and only if... no
> previous valid NoV specified substantially identical information (i.e. the
> same violation for the same specific act)."
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keba wrote:
> I resign all my offices and go on hold.
>
> (What happens with the speaker office now?)
I think that since the office of the Speaker is Imposed, you cannot resign it.
—Tanner L. Swett
I believe that I did not distribute proposals or publish a pool report
last week, and thus I am in contravention of the rules requiring me to
do so. I will try to get them distributed later today.
—Tanner L. Swett
Gratuitous gratuitous evidence: to my knowledge, making a judicial
declaration is not a regulated action.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2865
>
> === CFJ 2865 (Interest Index = 1) ===
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:46 PM, omd wrote:
> I hereby invoke my R101 right to request formal reconsideration of a
> judicial determination that I should be punished, and appeal the
> judgement of CFJ 1631, as ruling that I registered three days later
> than my original attempt prevents me from t
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I have no problem with missing a proposal. Announcing that it's
> inconsequential because you think the proposal is stupid isn't
> something I think we expect from our Promotor, though.
Noted. I will be more civil in the future.
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:17 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 18:10 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I intend, without objection from 2 members of Imperial and without
>> objection from 2 members of Team 4, to move Tiger to Team 4.
>
> I object.
> I note that it's in Sgeo's and Yally's bes
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:35 PM, omd wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Taral wrote:
>>> 9. omd is the Pariah, and Rule 2312 applies to all players, including
>>> judges.
>>
>> No I'm not.
>
> Oh? I was pretty sure I checked the records...
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:44 AM, comex wrote:
> Proposal: Erratification
>
> Ratify the following incorrect document: { 1 + 1 = 3 }
The definition: "When a public document is ratified, the gamestate is
minimally modified so that the ratified document was completely true
and accurate at the time i
Conclusion: List-of-Succession-like things are a huge headache. Let's
go back to VLOPs.
—Tanner L. Swett
Note to self: I now have 21 Rests.
—Pariah Tanner L. Swett, still dangerously close to the edge
On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, Warrigal wrote:
> Without two objections from members of my team, I intend to change its
> name to "Confederate".
>
> —Confederator Tanner L. Swett
If possible, I do so.
--
Cantr, a browser-based RPG: http://www.cantr.net/ Create a Lojba
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Warrigal wrote:
>> Also, I question whether violating a SHALL is a rule violation if
>> GUILTY is inappropriate.
>
> Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?
I momentarily forgot the text of "
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: P fix (AI=1.7, II=0, Distributable)
I'm interpreting this as meaning that you thereby make this proposal
Distributable.
—Promotor Tanner L. Swett
> To create a Team Balancer means to create a new second-class
> Player entitled "Team Balancer " followed by the smallest
> positive integer that would cause the player to have a unique
> name, which means there has never existed a player with that
> name. Such a
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> CoE: This is missing about 6 proposals. Quite possibly every single
> one proposed since I stopped record keeping.
It is indeed missing every single one proposed since you stopped
recordkeeping. I wasn't aware that there were any; somehow,
I say if the report was published at time T, and it does not say it's
a report from time S, then it's a report from time T.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> No, PD is was exactly at one point. The logic: "All of us non-rebels left
> will move lower on the list if the rebellion wins. So we (collectively)
> want the rebellion to fail, so we shouldn't rebel (that's cooperation).
> However, individua
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Hawkishness (Rule 1871) of active players
> -
>
> Hovering: Tanner L. Swett
> Taral
>
> All other active players are hemming-and-hawing.
CoE: this is no longer defined.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I was also thinking towards the end that it's a pretty good Prisoner's
> Dilemma situation set up. Towards the end (when chance was pretty
> near 50/50) there were a few people who could better their position by
> one by rebelling; then there w
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Does fungibility break this?
No, because capacitors are not a currency.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> My argument is that this is governed by R2140(c). A Proposal is an
> instrument of power, and if it attempts to create a token, it is
> "modifying a substantive aspect" of the rule defining the Tokens (my
> argument implies that it is the token
Note that "class" isn't actually defined by the rules. It could just
as easily be "type", or even "set". If the rules state that something
is a class of asset, that doesn't really tell us anything we didn't
already know.
Now, here's what the key thing to realize is, as I see it. An asset
only exis
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> > > The asset defined is not "white ribbon"; it is "ribbon". Every ribbon
>> > > then has a color. A white ribbon is a ribbon whose co
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> While this does result in White Ribbons not being needed for a
>> Renaissance win (as White is no longer mentioned in the rule), it does
>> not result in White Ribbons
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal "White Renaissance" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 2199 "Ribbons" by removing:
>
> (except for White Ribbons, which can be awarded at any time
> within a month after they are earned)
>
> [So, no one posses
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> When an officer becomes inactive, all of eir offices become Assumed.
> Anyone can assume the office, and even immediately resign it if it
> seems likely that things will get done by deputization more
> efficiently when the office is empty.
F
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Keba wrote:
> Hm, I like the weekly destroying of ergs and capacitors, because I like
> the way the current economy works, so I am against a manual destroying.
Well, one of our stated purposes is to allow players to accumulate
power. How do you propose that this b
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I think that could be accomplished by making capacitors a bit more
> accumulable. Are they tradeable, for example? I'd say up the price for
> creating them out of ergs, and instead make it so that they don't
> automatically go back to erg fo
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I am, though I'm not sure of what I have to offer the FSCN.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Keba wrote:
> I would like to join, as I like team play.
Well, then, you're in. I hereby inceive the FSCN, composed of me,
Sgeo, Tiger, and Keba.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Keba wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>> I suggest adding a clause like this: "If there is ambiguity about the
>> number of words in a proposal (for example, if there are hyphenated
>> words), it SHOULD be interpreted as containing exactly 1337 wo
Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power to the elite, and
allowing players to accumulate po
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal "Leet Leadership" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Create a new Rule with power=1 entitled "Leet Leadership":
>
> When an interested proposal consisting of exact 1337 words
> (excluding information like name, or adopti
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:52 PM, wrote:
> AGAINST unless it's "labour"
Then it looks like my vote will effectively denounce yours.
—Disagreer Tanner L. Swett
"Labour" still means "work", not "worker". May I suggest "Undergrad"
or "Intern"?
—Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
>> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
>> existence, I think] called The Robot...
>
> Warrigal's one where causality works backwards?
No, H. Sgeo's one where all events take
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2842
>
> == Criminal Case 2842 (Interest Index = 2) ===
>
> Murphy violated Power-1 Rule 2143 by failing to publish an ATC's
> report in the week starting A
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
>> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
>
> No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
At least fix the spelling of "gardener".
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Grand Vizier: 3
> Head Gardner: 3
> Crown Prince: 1
Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> The shuttle has completed two very short journeys in quick succession.
> For each journey, every player who was active and not the enemy at the
> start of it has earned one farad.
>
> I award myself two capacitors for being onboard at the e
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal "Rights are important" (AI=3.5, II=1, distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Increase the power of Rule 101 "The Rights of Agorans" to 3.5.
An AI of 3 is sufficient for this, as an instrument with a power of 3
is not restricted.
—Tanner L. Swett
"Perpepuum" isn't a word, to my knowledge; perhaps you're after the
phrase "perpetual motion machine". "Labour" means "job" or "physical
task", so "Lab Worker" might work better there.
—Tanner L. Swett
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I change my nickname to 'The Robot'.
>
> -coppro
I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170
(power 3) by changing eir nickname to "The Robot", a confusing
nickname.
—Accuser Tanner L. Swett
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, wrote:
> Proposal "Different voting limits on democratic decisions?" (AI=2, II=1,
> distributable via fee)
> {{{
> Amend rule 2284 "Fee-based actions" by replacing
>
> A player CAN increase eir voting limit on a specified decision to
> adopt a proposal in its v
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On an unrelated note, my primary computer's power supply shorted out and
> caught fire a few days ago, meaning that I have only minimal use of it over
> the next couple of weeks until a replacement can be shipped (i.e. until the
> batteries r
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I believe this fails; you did not specify which Fragments you were using.
Submitting the proposal succeeded, but making it a D-Proposal failed.
—Lawyer Tanner L. Swett
You may want to add some fragments to this proposal's inode. Also, the
first paragraph contains the typo "repot".
—Coauthorial Candidate Tanner L. Swett
This has been hanging out in my drafts folder since the beginning of
this year. I've decided to finish it up and post it for the sake of
entertainment.
{This is a public contract known as Rent-a-Self. Membership in this
contract is restricted to players. Device number is a
party-to-this-contract s
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I opine AFFIRM without prejudice. The original judgement suggests a
> precedent that even a disclaimered statement violates Truthiness if you
> don't reasonably believe it could be true.
I opine AFFIRM without prejudice for the same reason.
—
Waking up after a multi-month nap seems like a good idea to me. I
become active. I sit. I change my nickname to Tanner L. Swett.
—Tanner L. Swett, now one of the few Agorans who uses his real name
for Agora but a nickname for his "From" line
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:15 AM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro wrote:
>>
>>> I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed
>>> Warrigal's registration.
>>
>> I transfer a p
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 18:52, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed
>> Warrigal's registration.
>>
>> -coppro
>>
>
> I still do not see when
e is that the software is really terrible.
Yes, but once you have your own server, you can scrape it all you want.
--Warrigal
2009/7/8 Warrigal :
> LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
> LATIN SMALL LETTER O
> LATIN SMALL LETTER W
Please disregard this message. It is a typo.
--Warrigal
LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
LATIN SMALL LETTER O
LATIN SMALL LETTER W
?
That is the Conductor's report, published as required by Rule 2126 via
Rule 2166 via Rule 2143. Chiefly, it lists how many of each type of
Note (Rule 2126) each player owns.
--Warrigal
2009/7/1 Ed Murphy :
> As CotC, I intend (without 3 objections) to change this case's
> Interest Index to 0.
You can't; only the Justiciar and the Justiciar can do that. Which is
silly enough that it might be false.
--Warrigal, who thinks that citing Agora's rules in APA format is silly
09 08:03:36 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.40 (Red Hat Linux)
Accept-Ranges: bytes
X-Powered-By: PHP/4.2.2
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-control: no-cache
Expires: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:03:42 -0700
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
--Warrigal
"David slowed his pace sligh
en if this were an attempt to flip
a contract's Disclosure to Public, it would not have succeeded.
--Tanner "Warrigal" Swett
2009/6/24 Ed Murphy
>
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2611
>
> == CFJ 2611 =
ng, meaning it's split into syllables:
.deivyd.slo,ud. Given this, of course, .deivyd.slod. probably would
have been a better Lojbanization.
--Warrigal
"David slowed his pace slightly as his ears, protruding as they were,
kept snagging on the foliage."
marvellous" probably isn't a bad 'ordinary language'
> interpretation. (Don't like that it's not a noun? Please direct your
> complaint to Ozymandias c/o Mr Shelley.)
I believe his name is Mu-Nan, and you'd be better of sending it c/o
NFN Llewellyn anyway.
Oh, wait, *that* Ozymandias.
--Warrigal
2009/6/16 Elliott Hird
> 2009/6/16 Taral :
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Elliott
> > Hird wrote:
> >> NOTE: this is scripted. Myndzi replies to all actions like that. No
> >> consent was involved.
> >
> > I'd say consent was involved in the writing of a script.
> >
> > --
> > Taral
> > "Pl
one you joined.
Nobody except me agreed to the old ə, and I un-agreed to it. From it.
--Warrigal
ontract and a pledge
known as ä, which terminates 24 hours from the time of its
publication. Anyone can act on my behalf to CFJ on the following
statement: "Within the past 24 hours, Warrigal created a pledge known
as ä."}
--Warrigal
2009/6/14 Alex Smith :
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 02:21 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
>> I cease to agree to all non-binding agreements.
> As the notary, I think the only effect this has is to cancel any
> contract creation attempts you made in the past which failed because
> they weren&#
2009/6/14 Sean Hunt :
> Disagree, is binding.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be a sentence. Are you saying "I
disagree; it's binding"? "'Disagree' is binding"? Something else which
would actually make sense to me in this context?
--Warrigal
a different deck". Monthly draws are from
> deck frequencies indicated by players' switches.
I imagine that Legislative and Academic could be merged into a single
Legislative deck; they're both about proposals. Renaming Bureaucratic
to Executive would make a lot of s
I change my nickname to Tanner Swett.
--Tom, who would like to go back to being called Warrigal
If I may...
Official Secrets Act (AI = 3, II = 2)
{Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled "The Official Secrets Act" with the
following text:
{The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is the agreement with the
following text: "This is a public contract and a pledge known as the
Non-Disclosure Agreement." P
2009/6/8 Charles Walker :
> I submit the following three proposals:
> {
> Official Secrets Act
> AI = 1, II = 2
> Create a new Power 1 Rule, titled "The Official Secrets Act" with the
> following text:
This is going to run afoul of Rule 101 unless you amend it. Also,
let's not have "Secret Informa
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:35 PM, comex wrote:
> A person CAN deposit an asset by transferring it to the IBA; e then
> gains the Effective Rate in zorkmids.
>
> The Effective Rate for a deposit is its Rate, multiplied by a value
> depending on the number of previous deposits made in the same week
>
English would probably include a lot of things we don't want to
include, such as arbitrary computer programs written by arbitrary
people.
--Warrigal--no, that's not right. Thomas O'Malley.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> --Thomas O'Malley (see, I remembered this time)
>
> What is your official name anyway "Warrigal"?
I believe it's Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas O'Malley.
--Thomas O'Malley
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Luke Benner wrote:
> I am requesting to join Agora. The name I will be writing under will be
> Randy Olshaw.
Lessee, by Rule 217, "to join Agora" is the same as "to register", so
you're requesting registration, which, by Rule 869, makes you a
player. I think.
Wel
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, entitled {Instant Adoption}, AI 3, II
> 1, coauthored by Goethe:
> {{{
> Create a new power-3 rule:
> {{
> A player may cause instant adoption of a proposal that has not
> yet been voted on with A*P/(A+1)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Warrigal wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
>>> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
>>
>> See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the mo
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning. I
forgot two thirds of it.
I change my nickname to Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas
O'Malley, abbreviated Th
I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
--Warrigal
case]
In that case, I won't attempt to appeal.
--Warrigal
thing is a CFJ.
>
>
In what message was this called? I may want to appeal it if it sets
the precedent that it's possible to change whether a past message was
effective or not.
--Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> You seriously don't want to see the sort of thing a decent player could
> do if they had a positive power. (It wouldn't even need to be as high as
> 1.)
Okay, what could they do with a positive power?
--Warrigal
ouncement. (Is {es} the correct word there? Or would {is} or
>>> {eis} be better?)
>>
>> eir.
>
> Ah, thanks. I thought that was only used in the possessive.
If "awaiting his return and posting [something] own win announcement"
isn't the possessive, then what is it?
--Warrigal
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> We should so join this, right?
I imagine it would be similar if Agora and B simply joined each other,
or at least if B joined Agora. I believe that BlogNomic will not join.
--Warrigal
on in the decoded output seems to match the amount of
information in the encoded messages, indicating that there is no or
very little content which has not been revealed.
--Warrigal
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> I believe precedent is that flipping a certain Agoran switch (namely,
>> Citizenship) is not the same as an explicit, willful agreement to be
>> bound by the rules
ber of AGRA they can own if they're not in it.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> The point?
It's yet another of my schemes to give Agora a fungible, liquid,
relatively stable currency.
--Warrigal
modify a Soft Bylaw or publish any message on Agora
Corporation's behalf with 1 Corporate Consent.}}
--Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>> While we've found that SHALL -> CAN, we haven't found that SHALL NOT ->
>> CANNOT. In fact, accepting that SHALL NOT -> CANNOT would probably
>> break a lot of things.
>
> It seems to me (based on a dusty recollection of formal logic) th
ac.uk
> ihope ihope...@gmail.com
I consent to being a party to the PerlNomic Partnership.
--Warrigal
ot;X means Y" is not the same as "if X, then Y". The
former puts Y at the same power level as the rule that uses X; the
latter puts it at the same power level as itself.
--Warrigal
#x27;t cause it to
cease to exist.
OR DOES IT?
--Warrigal
, what a strange typo.
--Warrigal
Promote all power-1 rules to the power 1.1. Enact the November
2002 ruleset at power 1.
--Warrigal
for the immediately preceding
sixty days; however, a player's status as a Senator can be otherwise
changed", and just changing the third paragraph to say "a senator is
generally . . ."
--Warrigal
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> I NoV against Warrigal for violating the power-1.7 rule 2169 by
>> violating the equation of CFJ 2119.
>>
>> (Context: the equation of CFJ 2119 is:
>> {{
>&
t chocolate ice cream. Every player has the
right to eat strawberry ice cream rather than eat chocolate ice
cream."
I think this means that a player NEED NOT eat chocolate ice cream if
they eat strawberry ice cream instead.
--Warrigal
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
