Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2018-02-28 Thread Aris Merchant
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:56 PM Gaelan Steele wrote: > Title: “Transactions” > AI: not sure, help? > > Create a rule titled “Transactions” [power?] with the following text: { > A set of actions to be performed is a transaction if it is specified as > such by a rule with power

DIS: Proto: Transactions

2018-02-28 Thread Gaelan Steele
Title: “Transactions” AI: not sure, help? Create a rule titled “Transactions” [power?] with the following text: { A set of actions to be performed is a transaction if it is specified as such by a rule with power [?] or greater, or the document or message describing the actions. If any action in

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Ian Kelly
On Dec 30, 2007 6:03 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From playing B Nomic, I've seen one potentially useful idea: transactions. I'm not sure if everyone wants them, but let's see: Proto: Transactions (power=3?) Create a rule titled Transactions with the following text: A

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Monday 31 December 2007 10:40:35 Ian Kelly wrote: On Dec 30, 2007 6:03 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From playing B Nomic, I've seen one potentially useful idea: transactions. I'm not sure if everyone wants them, but let's see: Proto: Transactions (power=3?) Create a

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Ian Kelly
On Dec 31, 2007 10:54 AM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps have transactions self-ratify? :p It might be reasonable to have the actions self-ratify, but not the assertions; it would be too much to force recordkeepors to keep track of what assertions have been made and what their

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Monday 31 December 2007 11:01:33 Ian Kelly wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 10:54 AM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps have transactions self-ratify? :p It might be reasonable to have the actions self-ratify, but not the assertions; it would be too much to force recordkeepors to

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Ian Kelly
On Dec 31, 2007 11:04 AM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps: An announcement may be made asserting the success or failure of a Transaction. This announcement is self-ratifying.? We'd have to remember to make the announcement for each transaction. -root

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Monday 31 December 2007 11:08:56 Ian Kelly wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 11:04 AM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps: An announcement may be made asserting the success or failure of a Transaction. This announcement is self-ratifying.? We'd have to remember to make the

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-31 Thread Ed Murphy
pikhq wrote: On Monday 31 December 2007 11:08:56 Ian Kelly wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 11:04 AM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps: An announcement may be made asserting the success or failure of a Transaction. This announcement is self-ratifying.? We'd have to remember to make

DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-30 Thread Josiah Worcester
From playing B Nomic, I've seen one potentially useful idea: transactions. I'm not sure if everyone wants them, but let's see: Proto: Transactions (power=3?) Create a rule titled Transactions with the following text: A transaction is a method of announcing actions, contained entirely within

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-30 Thread Ed Murphy
pikhq wrote: From playing B Nomic, I've seen one potentially useful idea: transactions. I'm not sure if everyone wants them, but let's see: Proto: Transactions (power=3?) Create a rule titled Transactions with the following text: A transaction is a method of announcing actions, contained

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-30 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 30 December 2007 18:29:54 Ed Murphy wrote: pikhq wrote: From playing B Nomic, I've seen one potentially useful idea: transactions. I'm not sure if everyone wants them, but let's see: Proto: Transactions (power=3?) Create a rule titled Transactions with the following text:

Re: DIS: Proto: Transactions

2007-12-30 Thread ihope
On Dec 30, 2007 8:03 PM, Josiah Worcester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From playing B Nomic, I've seen one potentially useful idea: transactions. I'm not sure if everyone wants them, but let's see: Proto: Transactions (power=3?) Create a rule titled Transactions with the following text: A