DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-20 Thread ATMunn .
​On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else > in the next day or so, I'll pend it for real. I pend the proposal "A Reward for Obedience v4" for 1 shiny. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-19 Thread ATMunn .
Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else in the next day or so, I'll pend it for real. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > Changes from last version: > * Repealed victory elections > * Clarified when certain things can

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-17 Thread ATMunn .
[sorry for double post, Gmail doesn't have a good way to reply to multiple emails at once. I'm probably going to switch to a desktop client soon.] On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues: > - A player

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-17 Thread ATMunn .
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a > Medal of > Honour once it's awarded. So it's like trust tokens that people just have > to > keep track - is that intentional? (As Herald

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-17 Thread Alexis Hunt
Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues: - A player does not stop becoming eligible at the end of the month. I would say "eligible for a Medal of Honour that month", to avoid this. - If a player incorrectly announces eligibility, this could invalidate the entire vote later. Not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
Oh, last thing: you should throw in this Proposal a repeal of the Victory Elections (Rule 2482). This is a much better replacement and we don't need both. On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a > Medal of > Honour

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

2017-10-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a Medal of Honour once it's awarded. So it's like trust tokens that people just have to keep track - is that intentional? (As Herald I'd probably put this in my monthly report anyway). Also there's a timing problem.