On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else
> in the next day or so, I'll pend it for real.
I pend the proposal "A Reward for Obedience v4" for 1 shiny.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM,
Alright. I think this looks pretty good. If nobody mentions anything else
in the next day or so, I'll pend it for real.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:40 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Changes from last version:
> * Repealed victory elections
> * Clarified when certain things can
[sorry for double post, Gmail doesn't have a good way to reply to multiple
emails at once. I'm probably going to switch to a desktop client soon.]
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues:
> - A player
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a
> Medal of
> Honour once it's awarded. So it's like trust tokens that people just have
> to
> keep track - is that intentional? (As Herald
Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues:
- A player does not stop becoming eligible at the end of the month. I would
say "eligible for a Medal of Honour that month", to avoid this.
- If a player incorrectly announces eligibility, this could invalidate the
entire vote later. Not
Oh, last thing: you should throw in this Proposal a repeal of the Victory
Elections
(Rule 2482). This is a much better replacement and we don't need both.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a
> Medal of
> Honour
Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a Medal
of
Honour once it's awarded. So it's like trust tokens that people just have to
keep track - is that intentional? (As Herald I'd probably put this in my
monthly
report anyway).
Also there's a timing problem.
7 matches
Mail list logo