Yeah, even worse, I've found myself panicking because I _haven't_ counted the proposals I'm pending and can't remember how many I have left. (This was another reason for submitting things via Kenyon.)
I would vote FOR this in its current state, but I would prefer it if the class of the crime were lowered slightly (to 2 or 3), since the criterion for determining whether someone is guilty is subjective. -twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On August 10, 2018 6:17 AM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I submit and pend the following proposal. This should be seen more as > an implementation tweak than anything else; I've noticed myself > counting the proposals I'm pending, even though I know they all > deserve to be distributed. I've considered removing the idea of > pending altogether, but it's still useful as a flag mechanism to see > if something comes up at the last minute. > > -Aris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Title: Even Freer Proposals > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > Change Rule 2445, "How to Pend a Proposal", to read in full: > > Imminence is a switch, tracked by the Promotor, possessed by > proposals in the Proposal Pool, whose value is either "pending" or > "not pending" (default). > > Any player CAN flip a specified proposal's imminence to "pending" > by announcement. A player SHALL NOT submit and/or pend proposals that are > collectively unreasonable and excessive (hereafter excess proposals); > doing so constitutes the Class-4 Crime of Excess Legislation. The Promotor > CAN remove any excess proposal from the pool.
